A Quantitative Assessment of Teachers’ Intercultural Competence in Higher Vocational Education in the Context of Internationalization at Home with a Downward Logistic Regression Model
Jun 05, 2025
About this article
Published Online: Jun 05, 2025
Received: Jan 07, 2025
Accepted: Apr 16, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0969
Keywords
© 2025 Chang Liu, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Teachers’ ability clustering results based on the initial cluster center
| Cluster result | Teacher type | Number | Proportion (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Communication teacher | 39 | 19.50 |
| 2 | Incompetent teacher | 43 | 21.50 |
| 3 | Common teacher | 82 | 41.00 |
| 4 | Excellent teacher | 36 | 18.00 |
The result of the teacher’s intercultural competence clustering analysis
| The teacher’s cross-cultural evaluation index(Score) | Cluster result | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| knowledge related to the culture of the country | 88.93 | 90.52 | 70.16 | 75.39 |
| knowledge related to foreign culture | 75.42 | 84.32 | 73.44 | 94.36 |
| Attitude | 60.13 | 62.75 | 70.14 | 96.35 |
| Cross-cultural communication skills | 90.52 | 68.89 | 59.43 | 87.52 |
| Cross-cultural cognitive skills | 44.87 | 61.23 | 64.36 | 75.95 |
| Consciousness | 68.43 | 60.79 | 67.98 | 90.19 |
The distribution of intercultural competence in this paper
| Measuring index | Fractional segment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <50 | 50—80 | 80—90 | 90—95 | >95 | |
| Mean | 14.17 | 9.25 | 8.134 | 8.09 | 8.087 |
| Variance | 3.85 | 1.80 | 0.37 | 0.28 | 0.27 |
| Minimum value | 8 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| First point | 12 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Median | 13 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Third point | 15.86 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Maximum value | 22 | 15 | 12 | 9 | 8 |