A Quantitative Assessment of Teachers’ Intercultural Competence in Higher Vocational Education in the Context of Internationalization at Home with a Downward Logistic Regression Model
05 giu 2025
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Pubblicato online: 05 giu 2025
Ricevuto: 07 gen 2025
Accettato: 16 apr 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0969
Parole chiave
© 2025 Chang Liu, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Teachers’ ability clustering results based on the initial cluster center
| Cluster result | Teacher type | Number | Proportion (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Communication teacher | 39 | 19.50 |
| 2 | Incompetent teacher | 43 | 21.50 |
| 3 | Common teacher | 82 | 41.00 |
| 4 | Excellent teacher | 36 | 18.00 |
The result of the teacher’s intercultural competence clustering analysis
| The teacher’s cross-cultural evaluation index(Score) | Cluster result | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| knowledge related to the culture of the country | 88.93 | 90.52 | 70.16 | 75.39 |
| knowledge related to foreign culture | 75.42 | 84.32 | 73.44 | 94.36 |
| Attitude | 60.13 | 62.75 | 70.14 | 96.35 |
| Cross-cultural communication skills | 90.52 | 68.89 | 59.43 | 87.52 |
| Cross-cultural cognitive skills | 44.87 | 61.23 | 64.36 | 75.95 |
| Consciousness | 68.43 | 60.79 | 67.98 | 90.19 |
The distribution of intercultural competence in this paper
| Measuring index | Fractional segment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <50 | 50—80 | 80—90 | 90—95 | >95 | |
| Mean | 14.17 | 9.25 | 8.134 | 8.09 | 8.087 |
| Variance | 3.85 | 1.80 | 0.37 | 0.28 | 0.27 |
| Minimum value | 8 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| First point | 12 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Median | 13 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Third point | 15.86 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Maximum value | 22 | 15 | 12 | 9 | 8 |