Research on the Analysis of Learning Influencing Factors Based on Multiple Regression in Online Ideological and Political Education in Colleges and Universities
22 set 2025
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Pubblicato online: 22 set 2025
Ricevuto: 28 gen 2025
Accettato: 30 apr 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0960
Parole chiave
© 2025 Xiaoguang Liu, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Coefficient of linear regression analysis
| Nonnormalized coefficient | Standard coefficient | Common linear statistics | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Standard error | beta | t | significance | tolerance | VIF | |
| (Constants) | 0.405 | 0.113 | 3.591 | 0.000 | |||
| Attitude and self-efficacy | 0.133 | 0.029 | 0.155 | 4.642 | 0.000 | 0.533 | 1.885 |
| Subject quality | 0.098 | 0.031 | 0.115 | 3.220 | 0.002 | 0.483 | 2.078 |
| Personal knowledge management | -0.022 | 0.022 | -0.025 | -0.862 | 0.389 | 0.612 | 1.596 |
| Learning strategy | 0.115 | 0.036 | 0.146 | 3.982 | 0.000 | 0.475 | 2.112 |
| Operating behavior | 0.197 | 0.036 | 0.211 | 6.612 | 0.000 | 0.621 | 1.626 |
| Communication behavior | 0.054 | 0.019 | 0.074 | 2.645 | 0.007 | 0.746 | 1.344 |
| Learning environment | 0.321 | 0.024 | 0.349 | 11.782 | 0.000 | 0.725 | 1.385 |
Demographic variables of interviewees
| Variable | Options | Frequency | Percentage(%) | Mean Value | Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Level | General Undergraduate | 550 | 100% | 1.91 | 0.352 |
| Gender | Man | 285 | 51.8% | 1.56 | 0.495 |
| Female | 265 | 48.2% | |||
| Peoples | Han | 500 | 90.9% | 1.12 | 0.366 |
| Ethnic Minorities | 50 | 9.1% | |||
| Age | Age 18 And Below | 180 | 32.7% | 2.05 | 0.38 |
| 19~22 | 230 | 41.8% | |||
| Age 23 And Over | 140 | 25.5% | |||
| Grade | Freshman Year | 110 | 20% | 2.68 | 1.025 |
| Sophomore | 108 | 19.6% | |||
| Junior | 135 | 24.5% | |||
| Senior Year | 197 | 35.8% | |||
| The Subject Of His Own Profession | Education/Management/Economics/Law | 260 | 47.3% | 2.22 | 0.725 |
| Science/Engineering/Agriculture/Medicine | 130 | 23.6% | |||
| Literature/History/Philosophy/Politics | 135 | 24.5% | |||
| Art Class | 25 | 4.5% |
Model parameter test results and research hypothesis validation
| Hypothesize | Pathname | Estimate | S.E. | C.R. | P | Validation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | Operating behavior←Attitude and self-efficacy | 0.276 | 0.059 | 4.7000 | *** | support |
| H2 | Communication behavior←Attitude and self-efficacy | -0.254 | 0.075 | -3.472 | *** | unheld |
| H3 | Learning effect←Attitude and self-efficacy | 0.078 | 0.046 | 1.695 | 0.093 | unheld |
| H4 | Operating behavior←Subject quality | 0.019 | 0.064 | 0.295 | 0.770 | unheld |
| H5 | Communication behavior←Subject quality | 0.083 | 0.083 | 1.000 | 0.315 | unheld |
| H6 | Learning effect← Subject quality | 0.143 | 0.047 | 2.895 | ** | support |
| H7 | Operating behavior←Learning strategy | 0.234 | 0.058 | 4.261 | *** | support |
| H8 | Communication behavior←Learning strategy | 0.424 | 0.075 | 5.766 | *** | support |
| H9 | Learning effect←Learning strategy | 0.122 | 0.044 | 2.761 | ** | support |
| H10 | Operating behavior←Learning environment | 0.265 | 0.049 | 5.485 | *** | support |
| H11 | Communication behavior←Learning environment | 0.147 | 0.056 | 2.631 | ** | support |
| H12 | Learning effect←Learning environment | 0.363 | 0.045 | 8.556 | *** | support |
| H13 | Learning effect←Operating behavior | 0.266 | 0.053 | 5.244 | *** | support |
| H14 | Learning effect←Communication behavior | 0.055 | 0.038 | 2.012 | * | support |
Descriptive statistical results of the survey questionnaire
| Evaluation index | Mean analysis | Proportional distribution(%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Standard deviation | Disrelish | Unsatisfactory | General | Satisfaction | Very satisfied | |
| Q1 gender | 1.66 | 0.45 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Q2 grade | 1.67 | 0.75 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Q3 The online teaching platform is convenient to use | 3.83 | 0.74 | 1.43 | 9.72 | 17.39 | 35.95 | 35.51 |
| Q4 The online teaching platform is fully functional | 3.34 | 0.62 | 2.07 | 10.06 | 15.72 | 36.5 | 35.65 |
| Q5 The online learning network is fluent | 3.47 | 1.36 | 5.11 | 19.87 | 24.41 | 31.73 | 18.88 |
| Q6 Teachers are skilled in using intelligent teaching tools | 4.33 | 0.95 | 0.9 | 6.8 | 14.61 | 40.83 | 36.86 |
| Q7 The teacher makes full use of intelligent teaching tools | 3.84 | 1.24 | 1.3 | 10.29 | 22.27 | 38.42 | 27.72 |
| Q8 Teachers can attend classes on time | 4.2 | 1.16 | 1.97 | 1.06 | 7.04 | 23.37 | 66.56 |
| Q9 The teacher is fully prepared | 4.18 | 1.33 | 0.64 | 1.89 | 12.52 | 32.98 | 51.97 |
| Q10 Teachers and students have good classroom interaction | 3.38 | 1.09 | 2.61 | 15.99 | 28.62 | 30.47 | 22.31 |
| Q11 The teacher carefully follows the homework review | 4.15 | 1.01 | 0.39 | 2.49 | 11.34 | 35.02 | 50.76 |
| Q12 Teachers’ teaching patterns have changed a lot | 3.64 | 0.96 | 0.77 | 15.68 | 28.51 | 34.32 | 20.72 |
| Q13 The teacher designed different teaching patterns | 3.83 | 1.08 | 1.19 | 15.18 | 23.21 | 38.59 | 21.83 |
| Q14 Teachers have more teaching cases | 3.58 | 0.65 | 1.2 | 14.52 | 28.43 | 34.38 | 21.47 |
| Q15 Teachers will provide electronic learning resources | 4.19 | 0.88 | 0.04 | 5.6 | 18.26 | 44.2 | 31.9 |
| Q16 In class I actively participate in classroom interaction | 3.72 | 1.95 | 2.13 | 22 | 27.53 | 25.89 | 22.45 |
| Q17 After class, I finish my homework on a quality basis | 4.02 | 1.14 | 0.42 | 10.53 | 22.52 | 34.44 | 32.09 |
| Q18 After class, I study electronic resources seriously | 3.65 | 1.92 | 3.06 | 15.51 | 23.43 | 29.36 | 28.64 |
| Q19 Your evaluation of online teaching effect | 4.45 | 1.19 | 1.58 | 10.62 | 21.14 | 39.04 | 27.62 |