Innovative Application of Human-Computer Interaction Technology in Higher Education Music Education
21 mar 2025
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Pubblicato online: 21 mar 2025
Ricevuto: 12 ott 2024
Accettato: 08 feb 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0654
Parole chiave
© 2025 Yeqiu Chen, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Design a demand point-weighted score
| Design requirement point | Student rating | Expert rating | Final score | Weighted score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | Details | ||||
| R1 | A variety of effective presentation methods | 3.90 | 4.33 | 4.115 | 0.0923 |
| R2 | Clear stratification of information | 3.95 | 4.45 | 4.200 | 0.0942 |
| R3 | Design style consistency | 4.25 | 3.35 | 3.800 | 0.0852 |
| R4 | Content fit | 3.85 | 4.71 | 4.280 | 0.0960 |
| R5 | Interactive fluency | 4.10 | 4.02 | 4.060 | 0.0910 |
| R6 | Feedback effectiveness | 4.15 | 4.20 | 4.175 | 0.0936 |
| R7 | Student interactive data analysis | 4.00 | 4.42 | 4.210 | 0.0944 |
| R8 | Perceived controllability | 4.35 | 3.65 | 4.000 | 0.0897 |
| R9 | Easy to operate and learn | 4.25 | 4.28 | 4.265 | 0.0956 |
| R10 | Situational fitness | 4.10 | 3.00 | 3.550 | 0.0796 |
| R11 | Scene aesthetics | 4.35 | 3.55 | 3.950 | 0.0886 |
Cronbach reliability analysis
| Cronbach reliability analysis - Simplified format | ||
|---|---|---|
| Number of terms | Sample size | Cronbach |
| 11 | 49 | 0.837 |
KMO and Bartlett’s test
| KMO and Bartlett tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| KMO value | 0.734 | |
| Bartlett sphericity test | Approximate chi-square | 151.985 |
| Degree of freedom | 52 | |
| p-value | 0.000 | |
Design demand point scoring
| Design requirement point | Score situation | |
|---|---|---|
| ID | Details | |
| R1 | A variety of effective presentation methods | 3.90 |
| R2 | Clear stratification of information | 3.95 |
| R3 | Design style consistency | 4.25 |
| R4 | Content fit | 3.85 |
| R5 | Interactive fluency | 4.10 |
| R6 | Feedback effectiveness | 4.15 |
| R7 | Student interactive data analysis | 4.00 |
| R8 | Perceived controllability | 4.35 |
| R9 | Easy to operate and learn | 4.25 |
| R10 | Situational fitness | 4.10 |
| R11 | Scene aesthetics | 4.35 |