Spatial Geometric Transformations and Shortest Path Planning in Plantscape Design
et
17 mars 2025
À propos de cet article
Publié en ligne: 17 mars 2025
Reçu: 18 oct. 2024
Accepté: 29 janv. 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0323
Mots clés
© 2025 Hanhan Zhou et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

The design effect of the spatial geometry of plant landscape is evaluated
| Evaluation index | Method | Frame number | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 200 | 300 | 400 | ||
| Standard deviation | MFEA | 0.9308 | 0.9463 | 0.9658 | 0.9851 |
| 3Dict-POM | 0.7306 | 0.6809 | 0.6647 | 0.5339 | |
| CPGOSVM | 0.6631 | 0.6396 | 0.6268 | 0.6262 | |
| Entropy/bit | MFEA | 0.6186 | 0.7399 | 0.8424 | 0.9659 |
| 3Dict-POM | 0.4367 | 0.4805 | 0.4936 | 0.4839 | |
| CPGOSVM | 0.4356 | 0.4647 | 0.4855 | 0.4977 | |
| Peak signal-to-noise ratio/dB | MFEA | 1.6812 | 1.6919 | 1.6814 | 1.7067 |
| 3Dict-POM | 1.4786 | 1.3335 | 1.2169 | 1.1912 | |
| CPGOSVM | 1.4533 | 1.3263 | 1.2009 | 1.1674 | |
Comparison results with criterion
| Dot cloud data | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data point | 229673 | 203974 | 248696 | 247885 | 325589 | 314977 |
| Matching method | Harris | TAMM | Harris | TAMM | Harris | TAMM |
| Iteration number | 25 | 50 | 25 | 50 | 25 | 50 |
| Run time (s) | 163.59 | 207.41 | 177.32 | 203.55 | 47.32 | 79.48 |
| Distance of the sum of squares | 0.0001 | 0.0032 | 0.0002 | 0.0093 | 0.0006 | 0.0093 |
