Spatial Geometric Transformations and Shortest Path Planning in Plantscape Design
and
Mar 17, 2025
About this article
Published Online: Mar 17, 2025
Received: Oct 18, 2024
Accepted: Jan 29, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0323
Keywords
© 2025 Hanhan Zhou et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

The design effect of the spatial geometry of plant landscape is evaluated
| Evaluation index | Method | Frame number | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 200 | 300 | 400 | ||
| Standard deviation | MFEA | 0.9308 | 0.9463 | 0.9658 | 0.9851 |
| 3Dict-POM | 0.7306 | 0.6809 | 0.6647 | 0.5339 | |
| CPGOSVM | 0.6631 | 0.6396 | 0.6268 | 0.6262 | |
| Entropy/bit | MFEA | 0.6186 | 0.7399 | 0.8424 | 0.9659 |
| 3Dict-POM | 0.4367 | 0.4805 | 0.4936 | 0.4839 | |
| CPGOSVM | 0.4356 | 0.4647 | 0.4855 | 0.4977 | |
| Peak signal-to-noise ratio/dB | MFEA | 1.6812 | 1.6919 | 1.6814 | 1.7067 |
| 3Dict-POM | 1.4786 | 1.3335 | 1.2169 | 1.1912 | |
| CPGOSVM | 1.4533 | 1.3263 | 1.2009 | 1.1674 | |
Comparison results with criterion
| Dot cloud data | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data point | 229673 | 203974 | 248696 | 247885 | 325589 | 314977 |
| Matching method | Harris | TAMM | Harris | TAMM | Harris | TAMM |
| Iteration number | 25 | 50 | 25 | 50 | 25 | 50 |
| Run time (s) | 163.59 | 207.41 | 177.32 | 203.55 | 47.32 | 79.48 |
| Distance of the sum of squares | 0.0001 | 0.0032 | 0.0002 | 0.0093 | 0.0006 | 0.0093 |
