Spatial Geometric Transformations and Shortest Path Planning in Plantscape Design
y
17 mar 2025
Acerca de este artículo
Publicado en línea: 17 mar 2025
Recibido: 18 oct 2024
Aceptado: 29 ene 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0323
Palabras clave
© 2025 Hanhan Zhou et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

The design effect of the spatial geometry of plant landscape is evaluated
| Evaluation index | Method | Frame number | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 200 | 300 | 400 | ||
| Standard deviation | MFEA | 0.9308 | 0.9463 | 0.9658 | 0.9851 |
| 3Dict-POM | 0.7306 | 0.6809 | 0.6647 | 0.5339 | |
| CPGOSVM | 0.6631 | 0.6396 | 0.6268 | 0.6262 | |
| Entropy/bit | MFEA | 0.6186 | 0.7399 | 0.8424 | 0.9659 |
| 3Dict-POM | 0.4367 | 0.4805 | 0.4936 | 0.4839 | |
| CPGOSVM | 0.4356 | 0.4647 | 0.4855 | 0.4977 | |
| Peak signal-to-noise ratio/dB | MFEA | 1.6812 | 1.6919 | 1.6814 | 1.7067 |
| 3Dict-POM | 1.4786 | 1.3335 | 1.2169 | 1.1912 | |
| CPGOSVM | 1.4533 | 1.3263 | 1.2009 | 1.1674 | |
Comparison results with criterion
| Dot cloud data | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data point | 229673 | 203974 | 248696 | 247885 | 325589 | 314977 |
| Matching method | Harris | TAMM | Harris | TAMM | Harris | TAMM |
| Iteration number | 25 | 50 | 25 | 50 | 25 | 50 |
| Run time (s) | 163.59 | 207.41 | 177.32 | 203.55 | 47.32 | 79.48 |
| Distance of the sum of squares | 0.0001 | 0.0032 | 0.0002 | 0.0093 | 0.0006 | 0.0093 |
