Research on the Path of Traditional Music Education Inheritance Innovation and Aesthetic Experience Enhancement Supported by Information Technology
17 mars 2025
À propos de cet article
Publié en ligne: 17 mars 2025
Reçu: 17 oct. 2024
Accepté: 11 févr. 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0272
Mots clés
© 2025 Ning Li, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Simple spectrum recognition results compare
| Title | See off | School song | Jingle bells | Sky city | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time consuming (ms) | 555 | 989 | 2891 | 9931 | ||||
| Resolution | 746×621 | 976×582 | 1485×1891 | 2356×2971 | ||||
| Consonant | 14 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 11 | 11 |
| Bar line | 18 | 18 | 8 | 7 | 19 | 18 | 52 | 53 |
| Digital note | 68 | 68 | 28 | 27 | 103 | 102 | 187 | 177 |
| Treble point | 10 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 83 | 84 |
| Bass point | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 24 | 22 | 2 | 3 |
| Uderline | 30 | 29 | 23 | 22 | 97 | 88 | 69 | 70 |
| Short line | 12 | 12 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 39 | 40 |
| Attached point | 6 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 10 | 17 | 18 |
| Total | 162 | 161 | 79 | 72 | 278 | 259 | 460 | 456 |
| Accuracy rate | 99.51% | 98.88% | 96.21% | 97.74% | ||||
Test results in sections
| Music | 80-90 | 70-80 | 60-70 | Below 60 | DR | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | CT | MT | Al | CT | MT | Al | CT | MT | Al | CT | MT | ||
| S1 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 33 | 31 | 0 | 97.89% |
| S2 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 36 | 0 | 96.89% |
| S3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 37 | 36 | 0 | 95.33% |
| S4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 27 | 26 | 2 | 95.33% |
| S5 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 22 | 4 | 95.44% |
| S6 | 6 | 6 | 51 | 10 | 10 | 11 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 96.89% |
| S7 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 96.01% |
| S8 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 33 | 31 | 0 | 97.89% |
| In total | 6 | 6 | 168 | 10 | 10 | 30 | 9 | 7 | 25 | 220 | 214 | 12 | 96.46% |
Test sample note level evaluation results
| Music | nCorr | nRef | nTot | Recall | Precision | F-measure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| “Empty water” | 119 | 124 | 160 | 0.96073 | 0.75682 | 0.84516 |
| “Jasmine flower” | 89 | 96 | 96 | 0.93235 | 0.93117 | 0.93007 |
| “Wild goose” | 91 | 98 | 96 | 0.93355 | 0.94986 | 0.93993 |
| “The ten faces ambush” | 106 | 110 | 115 | 0.96471 | 0.92516 | 0.94286 |
| “Spring river flower moon” | 134 | 136 | 148 | 0.98417 | 0.90854 | 0.9432 |
| “The white snow” | 73 | 76 | 76 | 0.96329 | 0.96211 | 0.96101 |
| “Guangling” | 169 | 180 | 175 | 0.94018 | 0.96433 | 0.9504 |
| “Triad” | 146 | 156 | 147 | 0.93789 | 0.99026 | 0.96164 |
| In total | 927 | 976 | 1013 | 0.95211 | 0.92535 | 0.93428 |
The whole process scores test results
| Music | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | Sample 4 | Sample 5 | Sample 6 | Sample 7 | Sample 8 | Total deviation | Mean deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deviation | Deviation | Deviation | Deviation | Deviation | Deviation | Deviation | Deviation | |||
| S1 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 28 | 27 |
| S2 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 9 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 49 | 6.7 |
| S3 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 39 | 5.7 |
| S4 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 30 | 4.8 |
| S5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 18 | 3.6 |
| S6 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 37 | 5.5 |
| S7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 59 | 7.7 |
| S8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 42 | 6 |
| In total | 56 | 46 | 50 | 42 | 47 | 33 | 45 | 51 | 302 | 5.71 |
