Acceso abierto

On the Method of Inverse Mapping for Solutions of Coupled Systems of Nonlinear Differential Equations Arising in Nanofluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer

Mangalagama Dewasurendra

Mangalagama Dewasurendra

Department of Mathematics, University of Central FloridaOrlando, USA
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Dewasurendra, Mangalagama
 y 
Kuppalapalle Vajravelu

Kuppalapalle Vajravelu

Department of Mathematics, University of Central FloridaOrlando, USA
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Vajravelu, Kuppalapalle
  
03 oct 2018
On the Method of Inverse Mapping for Solutions of Coupled Systems of Nonlinear Differential Equations Arising in Nanofluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer's Cover Image
Acerca de este artículo
Artículo anterior
Artículo siguiente
Cite
Descargar portada
Publicado en línea: 03 oct 2018
Páginas: 1 - 14
Recibido: 12 nov 2017
Aceptado: 05 feb 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21042/AMNS.2018.1.00001
Palabras clave
© 2018 Mangalagama Dewasurendra and Kuppalapalle Vajravelu, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Fig. 1

Flow configuration.
Flow configuration.

Fig. 2

Plot of E(c0,δ), the squared residual error over η ∈ [0,499] as a function of c0 and δ using parameter values Le = 2, Nb = 2,Pr = 1, Nt = 1, n = 0.5, A = 0.1314. The error function has minimum E(c0,δ,A) = 9.71 × 10–5 where c0 = –0.6195 and δ = 0.8462963.
Plot of E(c0,δ), the squared residual error over η ∈ [0,499] as a function of c0 and δ using parameter values Le = 2, Nb = 2,Pr = 1, Nt = 1, n = 0.5, A = 0.1314. The error function has minimum E(c0,δ,A) = 9.71 × 10–5 where c0 = –0.6195 and δ = 0.8462963.

Fig. 3

Plot of E(c0,δ), the squared residual error over η ∈ [0,499] as a function of c0 and δ using parameter values Le = 3, Nb = 1,Pr = 5, Nt = 0, n = 1, A = 7.8902. The error function has minimum E(c0,δ,A) = 9.41 × 10–5 where c0 = –9.30195 and δ = 1.03944.
Plot of E(c0,δ), the squared residual error over η ∈ [0,499] as a function of c0 and δ using parameter values Le = 3, Nb = 1,Pr = 5, Nt = 0, n = 1, A = 7.8902. The error function has minimum E(c0,δ,A) = 9.41 × 10–5 where c0 = –9.30195 and δ = 1.03944.

Fig. 4

Plot of E(c0,δ), the squared residual error over η ∈ [0,499] as a function of c0 and δ using parameter values Le = 2, Nb = 2,Pr = 7, Nt = 0.5, n = 0.8, A = 0.24764. The error function has minimum E(c0,δ,A) = 8.28 × 10–5 where c0 = –0.690605 and δ = 0.8462963.
Plot of E(c0,δ), the squared residual error over η ∈ [0,499] as a function of c0 and δ using parameter values Le = 2, Nb = 2,Pr = 7, Nt = 0.5, n = 0.8, A = 0.24764. The error function has minimum E(c0,δ,A) = 8.28 × 10–5 where c0 = –0.690605 and δ = 0.8462963.

Fig. 5

Plot of f̂(η), where Curve 1 has Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 1, Nt = 1, n = 0.5, Curve 2 has Le = 3, Nb = 1, Pr = 5, Nt = 0, n = 1, and Curve 3 has Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 7, Nt = 0.5, n = 0.8 using their respective error-minimizing convergence control parameter.
Plot of f̂(η), where Curve 1 has Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 1, Nt = 1, n = 0.5, Curve 2 has Le = 3, Nb = 1, Pr = 5, Nt = 0, n = 1, and Curve 3 has Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 7, Nt = 0.5, n = 0.8 using their respective error-minimizing convergence control parameter.

Fig. 6

Plot of f̂′(η), where Curve 1 has Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 1, Nt = 1, n = 0.5, Curve 2 has Le = 3, Nb = 1, Pr = 5, Nt = 0, n = 1, and Curve 3 has Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 7, Nt = 0.5, n = 0.8 using their respective error-minimizing convergence control parameter.
Plot of f̂′(η), where Curve 1 has Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 1, Nt = 1, n = 0.5, Curve 2 has Le = 3, Nb = 1, Pr = 5, Nt = 0, n = 1, and Curve 3 has Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 7, Nt = 0.5, n = 0.8 using their respective error-minimizing convergence control parameter.

Fig. 7

Plot of θ̂(η), where Curve 1 has Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 1, Nt = 1, n = 0.5, Curve 2 has Le = 3, Nb = 1, Pr = 5, Nt = 0, n = 1, and Curve 3 has Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 7, Nt = 0.5, n = 0.8 using their respective error-minimizing convergence control parameter.
Plot of θ̂(η), where Curve 1 has Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 1, Nt = 1, n = 0.5, Curve 2 has Le = 3, Nb = 1, Pr = 5, Nt = 0, n = 1, and Curve 3 has Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 7, Nt = 0.5, n = 0.8 using their respective error-minimizing convergence control parameter.

Fig. 8

Plot of ϕ̂(η), where Curve 1 has Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 1, Nt = 1, n = 0.5, Curve 2 has Le = 3, Nb = 1, Pr = 5, Nt = 0, n = 1, and Curve 3 has Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 7, Nt = 0.5, n = 0.8 using their respective error-minimizing convergence control parameter.
Plot of ϕ̂(η), where Curve 1 has Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 1, Nt = 1, n = 0.5, Curve 2 has Le = 3, Nb = 1, Pr = 5, Nt = 0, n = 1, and Curve 3 has Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 7, Nt = 0.5, n = 0.8 using their respective error-minimizing convergence control parameter.

Fig. 9

Comparison of f(η), θ(η) and ϕ(η) obtained by the MDDiM 3-term approximation and shooting method solutions with Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 1, Nt = 1, n = 0.5, where Curve 1 is shooting method results of f(η), Curve 2 is MDDiM results of f(η), Curve 3 is shooting method results of θ(η), Curve 4 is MDDiM results of θ(η), Curve 5 is shooting method results of ϕ(η), Curve 6 is MDDiM results of ϕ(η).
Comparison of f(η), θ(η) and ϕ(η) obtained by the MDDiM 3-term approximation and shooting method solutions with Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 1, Nt = 1, n = 0.5, where Curve 1 is shooting method results of f(η), Curve 2 is MDDiM results of f(η), Curve 3 is shooting method results of θ(η), Curve 4 is MDDiM results of θ(η), Curve 5 is shooting method results of ϕ(η), Curve 6 is MDDiM results of ϕ(η).

Fig. 10

Plot of Residual Error function verses Terms of approximation, where Curve 1 has Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 1, Nt = 1, n = 0.5, Curve 2 has Le = 3, Nb = 1, Pr = 5, Nt = 0, n = 1, and Curve 3 has Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 7, Nt = 0.5, n = 0.8 using their respective error-minimizing convergence control parameter.
Plot of Residual Error function verses Terms of approximation, where Curve 1 has Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 1, Nt = 1, n = 0.5, Curve 2 has Le = 3, Nb = 1, Pr = 5, Nt = 0, n = 1, and Curve 3 has Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 7, Nt = 0.5, n = 0.8 using their respective error-minimizing convergence control parameter.

Fig. 11

Plot of |–f̂″(0)| versus n, using Le = 3, Nb = 1, Pr = 5 and Nt = 0.
Plot of |–f̂″(0)| versus n, using Le = 3, Nb = 1, Pr = 5 and Nt = 0.

Fig. 12

Plot of |–θ̂′(0)|, where Curve 1 is |–θ̂′(0)| versus Nt using Le = 3, Nb = 1, Pr = 5, n = 1, Curve 2 is |–θ̂′(0)| versus Nb using Le = 3, Pr = 5, Nt = 0, n = 1.
Plot of |–θ̂′(0)|, where Curve 1 is |–θ̂′(0)| versus Nt using Le = 3, Nb = 1, Pr = 5, n = 1, Curve 2 is |–θ̂′(0)| versus Nb using Le = 3, Pr = 5, Nt = 0, n = 1.

Fig. 13

Plot of |–ϕ̂′(0)|, where Curve 1 is |–ϕ̂′(0)| versus Nt using Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 1, n = 0.5, Curve 2 is |–ϕ̂′(0)| versus Nb using Le = 2, Pr = 1, Nt = 1, n = 0.5.
Plot of |–ϕ̂′(0)|, where Curve 1 is |–ϕ̂′(0)| versus Nt using Le = 2, Nb = 2, Pr = 1, n = 0.5, Curve 2 is |–ϕ̂′(0)| versus Nb using Le = 2, Pr = 1, Nt = 1, n = 0.5.

Minimum of the squared residual error E(A,c0,δ) for three different sets of parameters_

LeNbPrNtnAc0δE(c0,δ,A)
22110.50.1314–0.61950.6739.71 × 10–5
315017.8902–9.30201.03949.71 × 10–5
2270.50.80.2476–0.69060.84638.28 × 10–5
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
1 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Ciencias de la vida, Ciencias de la vida, otros, Matemáticas, Matemáticas aplicadas, Matemáticas generales, Física, Física, otros
RSS Feed de revista