Structural design of high-performance garments based on geometric optimization
Mar 24, 2025
About this article
Published Online: Mar 24, 2025
Received: Nov 08, 2024
Accepted: Feb 26, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0707
Keywords
© 2025 Linqian Ma, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Figure 12.

Test results of conventional characteristics
| Clothing number | Fabric weight(g/cm2) | Fabric thickness(mm) | Fabric density(g/cm3) | Permeability resistance(kpa•s/m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Material 1 | 0.0189 | 1.008 | 0.188 | 747 |
| Material 2 | 0.0187 | 1.013 | 0.185 | 786 |
| Material 3 | 0.0191 | 1.008 | 0.190 | 799 |
| Material 4 | 0.0188 | 0.988 | 0.191 | 799 |
| Test suit | 0.0161 | 1.276 | 0.127 | 0.0644 |
Performance comparison results
| Number of petals | Isogeometric uniformity | This method | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operation time (s) | Poisson ratio | Young’s modulus | Operation time (s) | Poisson ratio | Young’s modulus | |
| Three petals | 2.58 | 0.14 | -3.41 | 0.0014 | 0.15 | -3.48 |
| Fou petals | 2.29 | -0.69 | -3.88 | 0.0016 | -0.69 | -3.95 |
| Six petals | 2.51 | 0.22 | -2.75 | 0.0021 | 0.21 | -2.78 |
Test results of clothing conductivity test
| Clothing number | Wet time (second) | Maximum moisture absorption radius(mm) | Water velocity(mm/sec) | Unidirectional transfer coefficient | OMMC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surface | Bottom surface | Surface | Bottom surface | Surface | Bottom surface | (%) | ||
| Material 1 | 13.541 | 121.786 | 7 | 0 | 0.4427 | 0 | -718.6745 | 0 |
| Material 2 | 12.511 | 121.578 | 7 | 0 | 0.4874 | 0 | -726.5843 | 0 |
| Material 3 | 13.345 | 121.932 | 7 | 0 | 0.4458 | 0 | -712.0311 | 0 |
| Material 4 | 12.48 | 121.77 | 7 | 0 | 0.4912 | 0 | -741.6091 | 0 |
| Test suit | 6.016 | 5.422 | 27 | 27 | 0.6708 | 0.7128 | 1184.3621 | 0.8322 |
Test results of clothing humidity characteristics
| Clothing number | Contact Angle(degree) | Moisture permeability(g/24h*m2) | OMMC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top | bottom | |||
| Material 1 | 112 | 117 | 939.415 | 0 |
| Material 2 | 117 | 114 | 932.454 | 0 |
| Material 3 | 114 | 113 | 960.767 | 0 |
| Material 4 | 114 | 112 | 879.586 | 0 |
| Test suit | 0 | 0 | 1782.855 | 0.8123 |
KES material style evaluation
| Clothing number | Bing-bending stiffness Ncm2/cm | 2HB-lag moment Ncm/cm | G-shear hardness N/cm*degree | Smdon-surface roughness micron | LC-compression linearity | WC-compression Specific work N/cm2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Material 1 | 0.2089 | 0.0558 | 4.51 | 3.81 | 0.511 | 0.09 |
| Material 2 | 0.2045 | 0.0366 | 4.85 | 5.87 | 0.568 | 0.084 |
| Material 3 | 0.2013 | 0.0561 | 4.53 | 4.46 | 0.48 | 0.1 |
| Material 4 | 0.2020 | 0.0494 | 4.61 | 4.93 | 0.365 | 0.094 |
| Test suit | 0.0224 | 0.0186 | 0.97 | 8.49 | 0.497 | 0.222 |
