Accesso libero

Research on big data visualization in the talent cultivation guarantee system of social sports instruction and management oriented to the concept of OBE

  
26 set 2025
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita
Scarica la copertina

Figure 1.

Four stages of talent portrait construction
Four stages of talent portrait construction

Figure 2.

CRF model
CRF model

Figure 3.

K value selection comparison
K value selection comparison

Figure 4.

Variable correlation analysis
Variable correlation analysis

Cluster result b value representation

Population range Score Form Moral quality Professional knowledge Physical and mental quality Humanistic quality Practice innovation quality Total score
Weight 0.23 0.28 0.14 0.12 0.23 1
79 Weighted (low-high) 17 19 19 21 11 13 7 9 16 18 70 80
Percent system (low-high) 73.9 82.6 67.9 75 78.6 92.9 58.3 75 69.6 78.3

Principal component composite score frequency graph

Interval Number Grade
0~0.2 11 One star
0.2~0.4 68 Binary star
0.4~0.6 121 Three star
0.6~0.8 74 Four star
0.8~1.0 26 Five star

Cluster result d value representation

Population range Score Form Moral quality Professional knowledge Physical and mental quality Humanistic quality Practice innovation quality Total score
Weight 0.23 0.28 0.14 0.12 0.23 1
58 Weighted(low-high) 15 18 19 21 8 12 7 9 11 15 60 75
Percent system(low-high) 65.2 78.3 67.9 75 57.1 85.7 58.3 75 47.8 65.2

Total variance interpretation

Constituent Total variance interpretation
Initial eigenvalue Extracting the load of the load
Total variance interpretation Percentage of variance Sum Total variance interpretation Percentage of variance Sum
1 4.305 47.156 47.156 4.305 47.156 47.156
2 2.976 15.641 62.797 2.976 15.641 62.797
3 2.238 14.584 77.381 2.238 14.584 77.381
4 0.903 12.273 89.654
5 0.656 10.346 100.000

Cluster result a value representation

Population range Score Form Moral quality Professional knowledge Physical and mental quality Humanistic quality Practice innovation quality Total score
Weight 0.23 0.28 0.14 0.12 0.23 1
96 Weighted(low-high) 14 18 24 28 8 13 4 7 10 18 60 84
Percent system(low-high) 60.9 78.3 85.7 100 57.1 92.9 33.3 58.3 43.5 78.3

Experimental data table

N ID Moral quality Professional knowledge Physical and mental quality Humanistic quality Practice innovation quality
1 130105 73.87 75.43 74.58 74.67 82.79
2 130926 73.56 71.58 76.82 86.39 80.72
3 130477 74.32 74.02 70.77 84.68 85.84
294 131060 73.38 85.19 75.7 83.59 82.6
295 131246 74.43 87.3 70.53 81.2 75.56
296 131432 77.1 83.38 72.96 77.34 77.3

Cluster result c value representation

Population range Score Form Moral quality Professional knowledge Physical and mental quality Humanistic quality Practice innovation quality Total score
Weight 0.23 0.28 0.14 0.12 0.23 1
67 Weighted(low-high) 16 19 22 25 11 13 9 11 17 20 75 88
Percent system(low-high) 69.6 82.6 78.6 89.3 78.6 92.9 75 91.7 73.9 87

Component score coefficient matrix

Variable name 1 2 3
Moral quality 0.087 0.054 0.016
Professional knowledge 0.012 0.109 0.121
Physical and mental quality 0.025 0.033 0.065
Humanistic quality 0.166 0.137 0.092
Practice innovation quality 0.073 0.041 0.178

KMO and Bartlett test results

KMO sampling availability number 0.861
Bartlett sphericity test Approximate card 11416.909
freedom 58
significance <0.05
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
1 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Scienze biologiche, Scienze della vita, altro, Matematica, Matematica applicata, Matematica generale, Fisica, Fisica, altro