Optimization of Teaching Model and Design of Intelligent Algorithm for College Students’ Psychological Education Course Based on Cognitive Behavioral Theory

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Clustering results and main characteristics of categories

Categories	Percentage of the mix	Main feature
A	19.24%	There is a certain degree of cognitive dissonance, low degree of emotional exhaustion, low degree of deindividuation, and center of accomplishment
B	10.82%	There is a certain degree of cognitive dissonance, degree of emotional exhaustion, low degree of deindividuation, and sense of accomplishment
C	19.87%	There is a certain degree of cognitive dissonance, emotional exhaustion, low degree of deindividuation, low sense of accomplishment
D	27.36%	There is a higher degree of cognitive dissonance, a high degree of emotional exhaustion, a high degree of deindividuation Sensory center
E	22.71%	There is basically no cognitive dissonance, in the degree of emotional exhaustion, low degree of deindividuation, achievement Middle sensation

Test results of the experimental group and the control group

/		N	M	SD	T	P
Philman	Control group	13	51.394	6.345	-0.5266	0.5716
	Experimental group	13	51.766	6.215
Energy	Control group	13	28.566	4.626	-2.0965	0.0385*
	Experimental group	13	29.826	5.593
Loneliness	Control group	13	41.945	7.826	0.3648	0.7168
	Experimental group	13	41.536	8.132
Life satisfaction	Control group	13	19.139	4.826	-1.1439	0.2548
	Experimental group	13	19.848	5.398

The results of the comparison were compared with the control group

/		N	T	P
Le Shang (post-test - pre-test)	Control group	13	3.6485	0.0000***
	Experimental group	13
Stress resistance (post-test - pre-test)	Control group	13	0.5264	0.6152
	Experimental group	13
Loneliness (post-test - pre-test)	Control group	13	-1.8165	0.0648
	Experimental group	13
Life satisfaction (Post-test - Pre-test)	Control group	13	3.9482	0.0000***
	Experimental group	13

Test of the difference between the experimental group and the control group

/		N	M	SD	T	P
Philman	Control group	13	50.615	6.428	0.6918	0.4936
	Experimental group	13	49.741	7.236
Energy	Control group	13	29.416	5.716	0.9769	0.3184
	Experimental group	13	28.436	6.269
Loneliness	Control group	13	42.716	8.246	-1.0652	0.2936
	Experimental group	13	43.315	7.856
Life satisfaction	Control group	13	19.066	4.936	1.5648	0.1254
	Experimental group	13	18.036	5.136

Test the test of the students’ mental health literacy data

Front and rear measurement dimensions	Mean value	Standard deviation	T	Freedom	Significant p values
Mental cognition	-1.1658	0.5866	-9.5264	21	0.0000***
Situational learning	-1.3165	0.8415	-7.3499	21	0.0000***
Practical inquiry	-1.3595	0.8135	-7.6948	21	0.0000***
Social interaction	-0.9466	0.5566	-7.9563	21	0.0000***
Rational decision	-1.0364	0.7315	-6.4263	21	0.0000***
Creative display	-1.3498	0.6348	-9.9165	21	0.0000***
Value reflection	-1.0645	0.7648	-6.4658	21	0.0000***