Optimization of Teaching Model and Design of Intelligent Algorithm for College Students’ Psychological Education Course Based on Cognitive Behavioral Theory
, , and
Jun 05, 2025
About this article
Published Online: Jun 05, 2025
Received: Jan 06, 2025
Accepted: Apr 22, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0978
Keywords
© 2025 Wei Zhang et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Clustering results and main characteristics of categories
| Categories | Percentage of the mix | Main feature |
|---|---|---|
| A | 19.24% | There is a certain degree of cognitive dissonance, low degree of emotional exhaustion, low degree of deindividuation, and center of accomplishment |
| B | 10.82% | There is a certain degree of cognitive dissonance, degree of emotional exhaustion, low degree of deindividuation, and sense of accomplishment |
| C | 19.87% | There is a certain degree of cognitive dissonance, emotional exhaustion, low degree of deindividuation, low sense of accomplishment |
| D | 27.36% | There is a higher degree of cognitive dissonance, a high degree of emotional exhaustion, a high degree of deindividuation Sensory center |
| E | 22.71% | There is basically no cognitive dissonance, in the degree of emotional exhaustion, low degree of deindividuation, achievement Middle sensation |
Test results of the experimental group and the control group
| / | N | M | SD | T | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philman | Control group | 13 | 51.394 | 6.345 | -0.5266 | 0.5716 |
| Experimental group | 13 | 51.766 | 6.215 | |||
| Energy | Control group | 13 | 28.566 | 4.626 | -2.0965 | 0.0385* |
| Experimental group | 13 | 29.826 | 5.593 | |||
| Loneliness | Control group | 13 | 41.945 | 7.826 | 0.3648 | 0.7168 |
| Experimental group | 13 | 41.536 | 8.132 | |||
| Life satisfaction | Control group | 13 | 19.139 | 4.826 | -1.1439 | 0.2548 |
| Experimental group | 13 | 19.848 | 5.398 | |||
The results of the comparison were compared with the control group
| / | N | T | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Le Shang (post-test - pre-test) | Control group | 13 | 3.6485 | 0.0000*** |
| Experimental group | 13 | |||
| Stress resistance (post-test - pre-test) | Control group | 13 | 0.5264 | 0.6152 |
| Experimental group | 13 | |||
| Loneliness (post-test - pre-test) | Control group | 13 | -1.8165 | 0.0648 |
| Experimental group | 13 | |||
| Life satisfaction (Post-test - Pre-test) | Control group | 13 | 3.9482 | 0.0000*** |
| Experimental group | 13 | |||
Test of the difference between the experimental group and the control group
| / | N | M | SD | T | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philman | Control group | 13 | 50.615 | 6.428 | 0.6918 | 0.4936 |
| Experimental group | 13 | 49.741 | 7.236 | |||
| Energy | Control group | 13 | 29.416 | 5.716 | 0.9769 | 0.3184 |
| Experimental group | 13 | 28.436 | 6.269 | |||
| Loneliness | Control group | 13 | 42.716 | 8.246 | -1.0652 | 0.2936 |
| Experimental group | 13 | 43.315 | 7.856 | |||
| Life satisfaction | Control group | 13 | 19.066 | 4.936 | 1.5648 | 0.1254 |
| Experimental group | 13 | 18.036 | 5.136 | |||
Test the test of the students’ mental health literacy data
| Front and rear measurement dimensions | Mean value | Standard deviation | T | Freedom | Significant p values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mental cognition | -1.1658 | 0.5866 | -9.5264 | 21 | 0.0000*** |
| Situational learning | -1.3165 | 0.8415 | -7.3499 | 21 | 0.0000*** |
| Practical inquiry | -1.3595 | 0.8135 | -7.6948 | 21 | 0.0000*** |
| Social interaction | -0.9466 | 0.5566 | -7.9563 | 21 | 0.0000*** |
| Rational decision | -1.0364 | 0.7315 | -6.4263 | 21 | 0.0000*** |
| Creative display | -1.3498 | 0.6348 | -9.9165 | 21 | 0.0000*** |
| Value reflection | -1.0645 | 0.7648 | -6.4658 | 21 | 0.0000*** |