Study on the Path of Embedding Red Culture into Civic and Political Education in Colleges and Universities and the Enhancement of Cultivation Effect by Integrating Deep Learning Models
e
24 mar 2025
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Pubblicato online: 24 mar 2025
Ricevuto: 23 ott 2024
Accettato: 15 feb 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0701
Parole chiave
© 2025 Dan Li et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Ideological and political education
| Primary index | Secondary index | Tertiary index |
|---|---|---|
| 1.Target concept (0.298) | 1.1 Course target positioning (0.500) | 1.1.1 Training scheme fitness (0.356) |
| 1.1.2 Target diversification (0.329) | ||
| 1.1.3 Education function realization (0.315) | ||
| 1.2 Course construction concept (0.500) | 1.2.1 The unification of people-education and talent-education (0.524) | |
| 1.2.2 Good atmosphere creation (0.476) | ||
| 2.Faculty (0.085) | 2.1 Faculty composition (0.425) | 2.1.1 Teacher’s advanced ideological and political consciousness (0.526) |
| 2.1.2 Abundant teachers and stable personnel (0.474) | ||
| 2.2 Teacher’s ideological and political literacy (0.575) | 2.2.1 The right political position and belief (0.602) | |
| 2.2.2 Good at excavating ideological and political elements (0.398) | ||
| 3.Course resource (0.116) | 3.1 Red cultural resource application (0.478) | 3.1.1 Abstract red cultural resource (0.500) |
| 3.1.2 Specific red cultural resource (0.500) | ||
| 3.2 Ideological and political material repository (0.522) | 3.2.1 Rich and systematic content (0.411) | |
| 3.2.2 Timely-updated and convenient repository (0.589) | ||
| 4.Teaching implementation (0.322) | 4.1 Teaching arrangement (0.242) | 4.1.1 The course theory and the practice are reasonable (0.389) |
| 4.1.2 The teaching progress is reasonable and rigorous (0.611) | ||
| 4.2 Teaching content (0.263) | 4.2.1 Emphasis on combination of theory and practice (0.375) | |
| 4.2.2 Focus on red culture resource (0.352) | ||
| 4.2.3 The proportion of ideological and political material is reasonable (0.273) | ||
| 4.3 Teaching method (0.257) | 4.3.1 Enrich the present form of ideological and political content (0.195) | |
| 4.3.2 Strengthen experience of the students (0.207) | ||
| 4.3.3 The teaching method is flexible and appropriate (0.213) | ||
| 4.3.4 Focus on inspiring students’ thinking (0.182) | ||
| 4.3.5 Timely, appropriate use of teaching tools and modern technical means (0.203) | ||
| 4.4 Course assessment (0.238) | 4.4.1 Process evaluation is combined with the final assessment (0.342) | |
| 4.4.2 Diversified assessment subject (0.328) | ||
| 4.4.3 Diversified assessment form (0.330) | ||
| 5.Teaching effect (0.179) | 5.1 Learning behavior (0.415) | 5.1.1 High class attendance rate (0.228) |
| 5.1.2 Good class condition (0.284) | ||
| 5.1.3 Active class discussion (0.267) | ||
| 5.1.4 High homework-completion rate (0.221) | ||
| 5.2 Learning achievement (0.585) | 5.2.1 Proficient in mastering and applying the course theory (0.372) | |
| 5.2.2 Exercise and strengthen comprehensive ability (0.309) | ||
| 5.2.3 Learning attitude is more positive (0.319) |
Pre-test and post-test ideological and political literacy comparison of experimental group
| Item | Pre-test | Post-test | t | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class theory | 13.56±2.95 | 18.96±4.87 | -4.551 | 0.004 |
| Practice activity | 12.68±3.11 | 19.07±5.06 | -8.128 | 0.001 |
| Red culture thesis | 13.27±2.64 | 19.53±4.93 | -7.105 | 0.002 |
| Team research | 13.74±2.59 | 19.88±5.27 | -8.548 | 0.001 |
| Ideological and political grade | 12.73±2.82 | 19.42±5.42 | -8.574 | 0.001 |
Reliability and validity of the questionnaire
| Cronbach’ α coefficient | Item number | |
|---|---|---|
| 0.956 | 33 | |
| KMO value | 0.952 | |
| Bartlett | Approximate chi-square | 11054.5516 |
| df | 385.000 | |
| p | 0.000 | |
Pre-test and post-test ideological and political literacy comparison of control group
| Item | Pre-test | Post-test | t | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class theory | 13.84±2.58 | 13.92±2.94 | -0.484 | 0.548 |
| Practice activity | 13.56±3.06 | 14.05±3.46 | -0.566 | 0.624 |
| Red culture thesis | 13.08±2.77 | 13.66±3.78 | -0.586 | 0.678 |
| Team research | 12.89±2.91 | 13.26±3.09 | -0.879 | 0.795 |
| Ideological and political grade | 13.02±3.22 | 13.68±3.48 | -0.785 | 0.852 |
Comparison of pre-test ideological and political literacy of two groups
| Item | Pre/post-test | Experimental group | Control group | t | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class theory | Pre-test | 13.56±2.95 | 13.84±2.58 | -0.265 | 0.624 |
| Post-test | 18.96±4.87 | 13.92±2.94 | 5.548 | 0.003 | |
| Practice activity | Pre-test | 12.68±3.11 | 13.56±3.06 | 0.523 | 0.428 |
| Post-test | 19.07±5.06 | 14.05±3.46 | 6.845 | 0.002 | |
| Red culture thesis | Pre-test | 13.27±2.64 | 13.08±2.77 | 0.842 | 0.578 |
| Post-test | 19.53±4.93 | 13.66±3.78 | 6.418 | 0.001 | |
| Team research | Pre-test | 13.74±2.59 | 12.89±2.91 | 0.642 | 0.689 |
| Post-test | 19.88±5.27 | 13.26±3.09 | 5.915 | 0.001 | |
| Ideological and political grade | Pre-test | 12.73±2.82 | 13.02±3.22 | -0.459 | 0.816 |
| Post-test | 19.42±5.42 | 13.68±3.48 | 6.942 | 0.003 |
