Study on the Path of Embedding Red Culture into Civic and Political Education in Colleges and Universities and the Enhancement of Cultivation Effect by Integrating Deep Learning Models
und
24. März 2025
Über diesen Artikel
Online veröffentlicht: 24. März 2025
Eingereicht: 23. Okt. 2024
Akzeptiert: 15. Feb. 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0701
Schlüsselwörter
© 2025 Dan Li et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Ideological and political education
| Primary index | Secondary index | Tertiary index |
|---|---|---|
| 1.Target concept (0.298) | 1.1 Course target positioning (0.500) | 1.1.1 Training scheme fitness (0.356) |
| 1.1.2 Target diversification (0.329) | ||
| 1.1.3 Education function realization (0.315) | ||
| 1.2 Course construction concept (0.500) | 1.2.1 The unification of people-education and talent-education (0.524) | |
| 1.2.2 Good atmosphere creation (0.476) | ||
| 2.Faculty (0.085) | 2.1 Faculty composition (0.425) | 2.1.1 Teacher’s advanced ideological and political consciousness (0.526) |
| 2.1.2 Abundant teachers and stable personnel (0.474) | ||
| 2.2 Teacher’s ideological and political literacy (0.575) | 2.2.1 The right political position and belief (0.602) | |
| 2.2.2 Good at excavating ideological and political elements (0.398) | ||
| 3.Course resource (0.116) | 3.1 Red cultural resource application (0.478) | 3.1.1 Abstract red cultural resource (0.500) |
| 3.1.2 Specific red cultural resource (0.500) | ||
| 3.2 Ideological and political material repository (0.522) | 3.2.1 Rich and systematic content (0.411) | |
| 3.2.2 Timely-updated and convenient repository (0.589) | ||
| 4.Teaching implementation (0.322) | 4.1 Teaching arrangement (0.242) | 4.1.1 The course theory and the practice are reasonable (0.389) |
| 4.1.2 The teaching progress is reasonable and rigorous (0.611) | ||
| 4.2 Teaching content (0.263) | 4.2.1 Emphasis on combination of theory and practice (0.375) | |
| 4.2.2 Focus on red culture resource (0.352) | ||
| 4.2.3 The proportion of ideological and political material is reasonable (0.273) | ||
| 4.3 Teaching method (0.257) | 4.3.1 Enrich the present form of ideological and political content (0.195) | |
| 4.3.2 Strengthen experience of the students (0.207) | ||
| 4.3.3 The teaching method is flexible and appropriate (0.213) | ||
| 4.3.4 Focus on inspiring students’ thinking (0.182) | ||
| 4.3.5 Timely, appropriate use of teaching tools and modern technical means (0.203) | ||
| 4.4 Course assessment (0.238) | 4.4.1 Process evaluation is combined with the final assessment (0.342) | |
| 4.4.2 Diversified assessment subject (0.328) | ||
| 4.4.3 Diversified assessment form (0.330) | ||
| 5.Teaching effect (0.179) | 5.1 Learning behavior (0.415) | 5.1.1 High class attendance rate (0.228) |
| 5.1.2 Good class condition (0.284) | ||
| 5.1.3 Active class discussion (0.267) | ||
| 5.1.4 High homework-completion rate (0.221) | ||
| 5.2 Learning achievement (0.585) | 5.2.1 Proficient in mastering and applying the course theory (0.372) | |
| 5.2.2 Exercise and strengthen comprehensive ability (0.309) | ||
| 5.2.3 Learning attitude is more positive (0.319) |
Pre-test and post-test ideological and political literacy comparison of experimental group
| Item | Pre-test | Post-test | t | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class theory | 13.56±2.95 | 18.96±4.87 | -4.551 | 0.004 |
| Practice activity | 12.68±3.11 | 19.07±5.06 | -8.128 | 0.001 |
| Red culture thesis | 13.27±2.64 | 19.53±4.93 | -7.105 | 0.002 |
| Team research | 13.74±2.59 | 19.88±5.27 | -8.548 | 0.001 |
| Ideological and political grade | 12.73±2.82 | 19.42±5.42 | -8.574 | 0.001 |
Reliability and validity of the questionnaire
| Cronbach’ α coefficient | Item number | |
|---|---|---|
| 0.956 | 33 | |
| KMO value | 0.952 | |
| Bartlett | Approximate chi-square | 11054.5516 |
| df | 385.000 | |
| p | 0.000 | |
Pre-test and post-test ideological and political literacy comparison of control group
| Item | Pre-test | Post-test | t | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class theory | 13.84±2.58 | 13.92±2.94 | -0.484 | 0.548 |
| Practice activity | 13.56±3.06 | 14.05±3.46 | -0.566 | 0.624 |
| Red culture thesis | 13.08±2.77 | 13.66±3.78 | -0.586 | 0.678 |
| Team research | 12.89±2.91 | 13.26±3.09 | -0.879 | 0.795 |
| Ideological and political grade | 13.02±3.22 | 13.68±3.48 | -0.785 | 0.852 |
Comparison of pre-test ideological and political literacy of two groups
| Item | Pre/post-test | Experimental group | Control group | t | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class theory | Pre-test | 13.56±2.95 | 13.84±2.58 | -0.265 | 0.624 |
| Post-test | 18.96±4.87 | 13.92±2.94 | 5.548 | 0.003 | |
| Practice activity | Pre-test | 12.68±3.11 | 13.56±3.06 | 0.523 | 0.428 |
| Post-test | 19.07±5.06 | 14.05±3.46 | 6.845 | 0.002 | |
| Red culture thesis | Pre-test | 13.27±2.64 | 13.08±2.77 | 0.842 | 0.578 |
| Post-test | 19.53±4.93 | 13.66±3.78 | 6.418 | 0.001 | |
| Team research | Pre-test | 13.74±2.59 | 12.89±2.91 | 0.642 | 0.689 |
| Post-test | 19.88±5.27 | 13.26±3.09 | 5.915 | 0.001 | |
| Ideological and political grade | Pre-test | 12.73±2.82 | 13.02±3.22 | -0.459 | 0.816 |
| Post-test | 19.42±5.42 | 13.68±3.48 | 6.942 | 0.003 |
