Accesso libero

The Innovation of Ceramic Interpreter Cultivation Mode under the Perspective of Intercultural Communication

  
21 mar 2025
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita
Scarica la copertina

Figure 1.

The ceramic interpretation teaching mode of information technology
The ceramic interpretation teaching mode of information technology

Figure 2.

FM A schematic representation of the multidimensional spatial mapping
FM A schematic representation of the multidimensional spatial mapping

Figure 3.

The overall framework of ceramic interpretation
The overall framework of ceramic interpretation

Figure 4.

The student’s professional ability to cultivate the mean
The student’s professional ability to cultivate the mean

Experimental results of the experimental study

Investigation problem Options, Numbers and ratios/(%)
A/Very agree B/Consent C/Neutrality D/Object to
1 32/53 15/25 10/17 3/5
2 30/50 12/20 15/25 3/5
3 28/47 15/25 13/22 4/7
4 37/62 19/32 3/5 1/2
5 29/48 15/25 15/25 1/2
6 32/53 17/28 9/15 2/3
7 31/52 16/27 11/18 2/3
8 29/48 18/30 11/18 2/3

Student career ability demand mean data

Professional ability Fractional value Professional ability Fractional value
Professional ability(C1-C4) 4.27 Professional ability(C9-C12) 4.145
C1-Professional knowledge requirements 4.32 C9-Ability to learn 4.21
C2-Professional core skill requirements 4.26 C10-Innovative ability demand 3.79
C3-General knowledge requirements 4.14 C11-Problem solving capacity requirements 4.35
C4-General skills requirements 4.36 C12-Information gathering capacity demand 4.23
Cross-vocational ability(C5-C8) 4.325 Social ability(C13-C16) 4.0175
C5-Demand for English applications 4.35 C13-Attitude need 3.96
C6- Interpretation ability 4.50 C14- Team coordination requirements 3.95
C7-Organizational management capacity requirements 4.22 C15- Environmental resilience requirements 4.01
C8- Language organization and understanding ability 4.23 C16- Psychological capacity demand 4.15

Significant test of mean difference

Ability indicator Pair difference t Freedom p
Mean value SD Standard error mean The difference is 95% confidence interval
Lower limit Upper limit
C1/C2 0.015 0.758 0.0356 -0.042 0.025 0.392 128 0.883
C1/C3 0.386 1.236 0.0421 0.186 0.412 5.451 128 0.000**
C1/C4 0.417 1.042 0.0493 0.413 0.523 9.027 128 0.000**
C2/C3 0.238 1.331 0.0412 0.156 0.128 5.151 128 0.000**
C2/C4 0.431 1.145 0.0367 0.324 0.439 8.367 128 0.000**
C3/C4 0.136 0.922 0.0403 0.049 0.201 2.936 128 0.001**

Pre-survey and post-test results

Variable Class n Mean Standard deviation Standard error of mean
Index score Laboratory class 60 63.84 2.5611 0.3254
Cross-reference class 65 65.21 2.8234 0.4127
After total score Laboratory class 60 80.19 2.4532 0.3251
Cross-reference class 65 75.33 2.3369 0.2965

Test of the test results of the class inside and after the class

Variable Pair difference t df Sig.
Mean SD Standard error of mean 95% confidence interval of the difference
Lower limit Upper limit
Pair 1 Control class Posttest/pretest 0.1800 0.4132 0.0721 0.0352 0.2968 2.521 60 0.032
Pair 2 Test class Posttest/pretest 1.9863 0.9256 0.1413 1.6893 2.3771 15.689 60 0.000

Student method ability demand mean difference significance t test

Ability indicator Pair difference t Freedom p
Mean value SD Standard error mean The difference is 95% confidence interval
Lower limit Upper limit
C5/C6 -0.362 0.623 0.035 -0.325 -0.215 -7.533 125 0.000**
C5/C7 -0.225 0.024 0.042 -0.236 -0.233 -8.699 125 0.000**
C5/C8 -0.058 0.911 0.011 -0.399 -0.124 -0.754 125 0.000**
C6/C7 -0.063 0.871 0.017 -0.412 -0.121 -0.252 125 0.000**
C6/C8 -0.017 0.364 0.056 -0.128 -0.075 -0.336 125 0.000**
C7/C8 -0.213 0.339 0.033 -0.213 -0.089 -0.712 125 0.000**
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
1 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Scienze biologiche, Scienze della vita, altro, Matematica, Matematica applicata, Matematica generale, Fisica, Fisica, altro