Accesso libero

Research on Data Science-based Digital Empowerment Path in the Integration of Civic and Political Education and Dual Innovation Education in Colleges and Universities

,  e   
21 mar 2025
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita
Scarica la copertina

Introduction

Excellent innovation and entrepreneurial ability and noble ideological and political qualities are the basic qualities of contemporary high-quality technical and skilled talents, and colleges and universities bear the responsibility of cultivating high-quality technical and skilled talents. The integration and development of vocational education is determined both by the essential attributes of vocational education and by the objective requirements of economic and social development for technical and skilled talents [1-2]. Therefore, through the integration of innovation and entrepreneurship education and ideological and political education to enhance the adaptability of technical and skilled personnel and meet the needs of social and economic development has become a natural choice for colleges and universities to realize the goals of running schools. With the intensification of technological turbulence and competition in the job market, innovation and entrepreneurship education has become an important means to enhance students’ competitiveness in the workplace and activate market innovation [3-4]. At the same time, innovation and entrepreneurship education plays an important role in training students’ core competencies such as innovative thinking, teamwork and problem solving, which can lay a solid foundation for their future careers. Ideological and political education is an indispensable and important part of China’s national education, and is also an important means of shaping students’ socialist core values and cultivating a sense of social responsibility, a sense of mission, and a spirit of craftsmanship [5-8]. How to combine innovation and entrepreneurship education with ideological and political education and play a positive role in talent cultivation is a problem that needs to be solved in the process of realizing high-quality development of contemporary universities. The organic combination of the two can not only help stimulate the enthusiasm for innovation, explore the potential for innovation, cultivate entrepreneurial spirit and improve independent learning ability through dual innovation education, but also guide students to shape the correct values, sense of professional honor and sense of professional mission through ideological and political education [9-12]. The organic integration of bicultural education and ideological and political education aims to cultivate higher vocational students with innovative spirit, entrepreneurial ability and socialist core values. Therefore, it is of great significance for colleges and universities to devote themselves to the integration and development of dual-creation education and civic and political education, which requires that data science and technology be used as the basis and informationization as the driving force, and that new digital empowerment paths be actively explored [13-16].

This paper explores the path of integrating Civic and political education with bi-initiative education in colleges and universities, and selects current graduate students of a university as the research object, and designs a questionnaire to collect the factors affecting the spirit of bi-initiative and the level of Civic and political education. Dual-creational spirit and Civic-Political achievement were taken as dependent variables, and independent variables included ability cultivation, government support, enterprise cooperation, university support, and value leadership. The factors that significantly affect the spirit of biculturalism were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, and the statistical significance of the factors that affect students’ civic and political level was verified by multi-factor ANOVA. The factors that passed the statistical test were included in the logistic regression model to carry out the logistic regression analysis, and finally the factors that have significant influence on the integration path of college civic politics education and dual-creation education were obtained for the use of data science to empower civic politics and dual-creation integration education.

The path of integration of college civics and dual-creation education

The construction of the Civic-Creative Integration Curriculum involves the curriculum system, teaching content, teaching methods and means, teaching materials and resources, etc. It is an important initiative for colleges and universities to improve the overall quality of teaching and talent cultivation. Deepening curriculum reform is an important path to realize the deep integration of civic education, innovation, and entrepreneurial education.

Improve the Civic-Creative Integration Curriculum System

In terms of the curriculum system of Civic-Creative Integration, based on the theoretical courses, practical courses and extension courses, we constantly optimize the curriculum system and establish a scientific and reasonable Civic-Creative Integration Curriculum System that adapts to the needs of students’ all-round development. In terms of theoretical courses, it builds a curriculum system in which compulsory courses and elective courses, online courses and offline courses complement each other, realizes the integration and penetration of ideological and political education and innovation and entrepreneurship education curriculum system, and meets the multifaceted needs of college students. In terms of practical courses, it strengthens the important position of entrepreneurship practice courses as the carrier of ideological and political education, realizes the organic unity of theoretical learning and practical operation, and reasonably builds a practical course system to enhance the practical ability of college students and meet the demands of social entrepreneurial talents. In addition, by setting up a second degree or a minor, the student-oriented innovation and entrepreneurship minor course is specially designed as an extension course of the curriculum system to serve the personality development of college students with entrepreneurial interests and to open up innovation and entrepreneurship “professional” education.

Mining Civic-Creative Integration Teaching Content

In terms of the teaching content of Civic-Creative Integration, the main line of in-depth integration is to establish moral values, integrate socialist core values, ethical and moral values, awareness of the rule of law, honesty and trustworthiness, and mental health education into the innovation and entrepreneurship courses, so as to build a “Civic-Creative Integration” course content system. As for the theoretical courses, on the basis of sorting out the teaching contents of the courses and taking into account the characteristics of the innovation and entrepreneurship education courses, we identify the integration space between the Civics courses and the Civics of the courses, and integrate the teaching contents. As for the practical courses, through systematic construction, combined with the content of the Civic and Political courses, the top-level design of the teaching content is strengthened, and innovative concepts and teamwork are integrated into the whole practical teaching process, avoiding the tendency to emphasize entrepreneurial skills, entrepreneurial project proposals, entrepreneurial practice projects, and so on, in order to realize the effective integration between the two.

Innovative Civic-Creative Integration Teaching Methods

In terms of teaching methods of Civic-Creative Integration, on the one hand, we explore new teaching modes such as inspirational teaching, case teaching, online and offline mixed teaching, flipped classroom, and diversified teaching such as “in-class + out-of-class” and “on-campus + out-of-campus” by means of the project-based system, activity-based system, and microclassroom, and so on. On the other hand, projects such as Civic Integration Excellence Courses, Demonstration Courses, and Famous Teachers’ Forums are carried out to promote the integration of Civic Integration in the already existing theoretical courses, seminars and sharing, and tournaments and other work sessions.

Enriching Civic-Creative Integration Teaching Resources

On the one hand, we make full use of the existing learning resources, such as the “Learning Strong Country” APP, the official website of Party history learning and education, the red thematic education base, the main theme of film and TV dramas, as well as the local “two courses”, the Party’s history learning platform and other platforms, to carry out in-depth integration of the Civic and creative thinking. Theme education. On the other hand, it has issued guidelines for the teaching of ideology and politics in the curriculum, built a library of elements and cases of ideology-creation integration with modern information technology as a tool, and increased students’ participation by means of case discussions and the presentation of curricular projects.

Data science research methods
Analysis of variance
Cardinality statistics

χ2 statistic (CHI) comes from the covariate test (CTT), which uses the degree of association between feature t and category A as a measure of feature importance, based on the assumption that it obeys a χ2 distribution with first order degrees of freedom. The method is similar to informability, except that it takes into account both positive and negative correlations on feature importance [17]. The χ2 statistics χ2(t, A) of feature t for category A can be expressed as: χ2(t,A)=m×(MQNP)2(M+P)×(N+Q)×(M+N)×(P+Q)

Where M is the number of documents in the training set that contain feature t and belong to category A, N is the number of documents that contain feature t but do not belong to category A, P is the number of documents that do not contain feature t but belong to category A, Q is the number of documents that do not contain feature t and do not belong to category A, and m is the number of all the documents in the training set with m = M + N + P + Q.

The greater the χ2 statistical value χ2(t, A) of feature t for category A, the stronger the association between feature t and category A, and the better the classification result of the selected feature. When feature t is χ2(t, A) = 0 for category A, it means that feature t and category A are independent of each other and completely unrelated.

Analysis of variance

Statistics uses variance to measure the degree of deviation between a random variable and its mathematical expectation (mean). A random variable with more concentrated values has a smaller variance. A more dispersed set of values results in a larger variance. For sample Xx{x1, x2, ⋯, xn}, the variance is the average of the sum of the squares of the differences between the individual data and the mean x, and can be expressed by the formula: D2=1n[(x1x)2+(x2x)2++(xnx)2]

Analysis of variance (ANOVA), also known as “analysis of variance” or “F-test”, was invented by R.A. Fisher to test the significance of the difference between the means of two or more samples. The basic idea of ANOVA is to analyze the contribution of different sources of variation to the total variation of the study, so as to determine the influence of controllable factors on the results of the study [18].

For m sample in the dataset, the magnitude of the residuals is related to the magnitude of the variance D2, where the residuals are defined as the difference between the observed output values and the fitted values. Assuming that the model is not over-parameterized, the variance can be estimated using the following equation: i=1m(yif(xi))2 S2=i=1m(yif(xi))2m(n1)

Where the denominator is the degrees of freedom of the residuals. The numerator is the sum of the residuals.

If the fitted model is appropriate, then S2 is a better estimate of D2. S2 is significantly greater than the true value of D2 when, and only when, the fitted model contains one or more input variables that should not be included. In the ANOVA algorithm, the model is first given all the input values and S2 is computed, then a particular input value is deleted, and if that input value is useful, then S2 will not change much. Otherwise, S2 will be significantly larger. The F ratio is introduced here to specifically reflect the above analysis. If a useful input value is deleted, then F it is close to 1. If a redundant input value is deleted, then F it is significantly larger than 1, and the F ratio can be expressed as follows: F=Sold2Snew2

Logistic regression

Regression analysis is an important branch of mathematical statistics, which is a powerful tool for exploring the causal relationship between various types of data. Logistic regression is one of the important methods of multivariate categorical analysis, and it is a powerful tool for dealing with multivariate complex variables and unconventional mathematical variables, especially some dichotomous problems, such as the problem between “disease” and “non-disease”, and the problem of “occurrence” and “non-occurrence” [19].

Mathematically speaking, the probability of an event occurring p may be any value in the interval [0,1], if 1 means that the event occurs, and 0 means that the event does not occur, then the event has only two states, “0” and “1”, which are discrete logical values, which can only be obtained by the transition function, and the ideal transition function is: P(Y=1|x)={ 0,z<0 0.5,z=βTx=0 1,z>0

In the above equation, x is a vector of explanatory variables affecting the occurrence of the event, β is a vector of regression parameters, z is a function of the explanatory variables x, and the value of function z will determine whether the outcome of the event is “occurrence” or “non-occurrence”.

Functions in conventional mathematical models are generally continuously differentiable, and the probability p of the event we want to obtain may be any value on the interval [0, 1], so an alternative function is needed to map a continuously differentiable mathematical function model to a set {0, 1} of only two logistic values. The alternative function for analyzing binary classification given by mathematicians CoxD.R et al (1970) is the logistic function (or Sigmoid function): g(z)=11+exp[z]

The logic function image is shown in Figure 1(a), from which it can be seen that the logic function image is a monotonically increasing bounded “S” curve on interval 1, the fast track of the function value is close to [−∞, +∞] when the independent variable tends to positive infinity, and the function value quickly approaches 0 when the independent variable tends to negative infinity, which is exactly in line with the characteristics of the probability of event occurrence in the interval [0,1], which is very important for solving the binary classification problem.

For the independent variable obeys the binomial distribution (“0” or “1”) of the two-distribution problem, the probability of y = 1 and y = 0 are respectively: P(y=1)=p P(y=0)=1p

p is the probability of y occurring and 1 − p is the probability of y not occurring, and the ratio of the two is the odds (odds), which refers to the ratio of the probability of an event occurring to the probability of it not occurring. Then the log odds are: ln(odds)=lnp1p

From equations (6) and (7), we know that at z > 0, g(z) > 0.5, P(Y = 1|x) = 1, when the event occurs. And there is p < 1 − p when the event does not occur, i.e., p < 0.5, P(Y = 1|x) = 0, g(z) < 0.5, z < 0, g(z) can be used to describe the probability of the event occurring p. Thus: ln(odds)=lnp1p=z=βTx

The image of the log odds function is shown in Fig. 1(b), and when the probability of event p is in the interval [0, 1], the log odds ln(odds) can be taken to any real number, and it is required that the function z can be taken to any number in the real number range. In equation (11), function z is a linear function of the explanatory variables, so function z can take any number in the real number range, which can also be seen in Figure 1(a).

Figure 1.

Logistic regression model function

With the logistic regression model in place, the next task to be accomplished is to use mathematical methods to solve for the vector of regression parameters β in function z.

In the actual modeling and analysis process, vector x usually contains more than one explanatory variable x1, x2xn, so the parameter vector β has more than one parameter β0, β1, β2βn to be regressed, and the function z is expressed as follows: z=βTx=β0+β1x1+β2x2++βnxn

In the above equation: z is a function of the explanatory variable x1, x2xn and β0, β1, β2βn is the regression parameter to be solved. Each database used for event analysis is a sample of data, and the overall database is not available, so it is necessary to

To use the sample data to estimate the overall parameters, in statistics, the maximum likelihood method is an efficient way to solve multiple regression parameters, multiple regression parameters can be obtained by solving the system of equations, which will not be repeated here.

After obtaining the regression parameters, a function of the probability of occurrence of the event can be obtained in the form of the following equation: π(x)=11+exp[(β0+β1x1+β2x2++βnxn)]

In the above equation π(x) is the probability of occurrence of the event, x1, x2xn is the explanatory variable and β0, β1, β2βn is the regression parameter.

Statistical analysis of integration pathways
Study population and questionnaire design

The study launched an anonymous whole group survey on full-time academic graduate students enrolled in the School of Public Administration of a university in Province H in January 2024, and the information was collected by filling out the electronic questionnaire online, and 96 valid questionnaires were finally obtained.

The questionnaire was designed by ourselves, and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.938, which was greater than 0.9 and had a good reliability, and the KMO value of the questionnaire was 0.801, which was greater than 0.7 and had a good validity. The survey content of the questionnaire includes the basic information, ability cultivation, government support, enterprise cooperation, university support, and value leadership of the current graduate students, which is measured and assigned by Likert five-level scoring method.

SPSS24.0 was used to describe and analyze the data statistics. Firstly, the chi-square test was used to carry out single-factor and multi-factor analysis, and then the variables with statistical significance (P<0.05) in the ANOVA were included in the logistic regression model to start the analysis. Among them, the spirit of biculturalism and the performance of Civics and Politics were used as dependent variables, and ability cultivation, government support, enterprise cooperation, university support, and value leadership were used as independent variables, respectively.

One-way ANOVA of the factors influencing the spirit of biculturalism

The results of the univariate analysis are shown in Table 1. Overall, the median and the plural of the self-rating number of graduate students’ innovation and entrepreneurship aspirations are both 13, and about 47.6% of the enrolled graduate students have high innovation and entrepreneurship aspirations after dichotomous treatment, and the results of the chi-square test show that the innovation and entrepreneurship aspirations of graduate students are related to the cultivation of ability, government support, cooperation with enterprises, support from colleges and universities, and value leadership, which indicates that graduate students who are adequately high in innovation and entrepreneurship ability, receive government and university support, maintaining cooperation with enterprises, and receiving value leadership are more likely to show high innovation and entrepreneurship aspirations of graduate students.

Descriptive statistics

Variable Low entrepreneur-ship High entrepreneur-ship χ2 p
Gender Male 44.3% 55.7% 0.864 0.385
Female 56.0% 44.0%
Student type Doctoral student 27.5% 72.5% 3.581 0.067
Master student 57.6% 42.4%
Grade First grade 55.3% 44.7% 3.057 0.229
Second grade 43.4% 56.6%
Third grade 72.1% 27.9%
A year or more work experience Yes 36.3% 63.7% 1.529 0.25
No 56.6% 43.4%
Ability culture High 16.8% 83.2% 7.731 0.005
Low 59.9% 40.1%
Government support High 76.2% 23.8% 20.813 0.00
Low 26.6% 73.4%
Enterprise cooperation High 71.2% 28.8% 12.043 0.001
Low 33.7% 66.3%
School support High 79.8% 20.2% 15.395 0.00
Low 35.0% 65.0%
Value guidance High 76.0% 24.0% 17.071 0.00
Low 33.0% 67.0%
Multifactor ANOVA affecting the level of Civics

The students’ learning data were selected and used to perform a multifactor ANOVA. In the general linear model, univariate commands (i.e., a single dependent variable) were executed to interpret the results in terms of competence development and value leadership. Table 2 shows the test for effects between subjects.

Test of intersubjectivity

Source The type of square of type Ⅲ df Mean square F Sig.
Calibration model 11.328a 19 0.086 91.643 0.00
Intercept 1.053 1 1.055 1332.212 0.00
Ability culture 1.518 5 0.047 50.074 0.00
Value guidance 2.582 9 0.044 44.012 0.00
Ability culture*value guidance 0.488 3 0.035 26.873 0.00
Error 0.514 76 0.018
Sum. 12.354 96
Total correction 11.828 95
a.R2=0.927(adjusted R2=0.926)

It can be seen that the significance tests of the overall model are less than the significance level, which shows that this ANOVA model is significant. Calculation shows that R2 = 0.927, so the conclusion is that ability cultivation and value leading are effective in improving the performance of Civics, and these two independent variables are also one of the main variables explaining the spirit of bicentennialism, with an explanatory part of 92.7%. In the two-by-two comparison of competence cultivation and value leadership, these two indicators have a significant effect on the effectiveness of Civics achievement.

The results of the multivariate tests are displayed in Table 3. As can be seen from Table 3, the significance test concludes that the significance value of each test is less than 0.01, and the effect of variables is significant. It can also be seen through the data that the gap between Pillai’s tracking data and Hotelling’s tracking data in the table is relatively large, with values of 0.465 and 0.907, respectively, which is a relatively large gap, indicating that the groups have a significant impact on the total model of the multivariate ANOVA.

Variable measurement

Effect Value F Assumption df Error df Sig.
Intercept Pillai’s tracking 0.997 26891.23b 5 87 0.00
Wilks’s Lambda 0.005 26891.23b 5 87 0.00
Hotelling’ tracking 239.534 26891.23b 5 87 0.00
Roy’s biggest root 239.534 26891.23b 5 87 0.00
Validity Pillai’s tracking 0.465 101.07b 5 87 0.00
Wilks’s Lambda 0.527 101.07b 5 87 0.00
Hotelling’ tracking 0.907 101.07b 5 87 0.00
Roy’s biggest root 0.907 101.07b 5 87 0.00

Table 4 shows the test of between-subjects effect. From the data fed back in Table 4, it can be seen that the effect of each statistical variable on the validity of the Civics scores was highly significant (Sig. = 0 < 0.01), using the significance level (P = 0.01) as a measure.

Test of intersubjectivity

Source Independent variable The type of square of type Ⅲ df Mean square F Sig.
Calibration model Ability culture 139.497a 1 139.497 90.06 0.00
Government support 132.519b 1 132.519 51.42 0.00
Enterprise cooperation 107.067c 1 107.067 31.88 0.00
School support 121.235d 1 121.235 22.841 0.00
Value guidance 57.569e 1 57.569 12.464 0.00
Intercept Ability culture 56739.096 1 56739.096 36621.956 0.00
Government support 52160.605 1 52160.605 20206.433 0.00
Enterprise cooperation 45838.896 1 45838.896 13485.628 0.00
School support 42468.158 1 42468.158 8035.548 0.00
Value guidance 51557.623 1 51557.623 10994.363 0.00
Validity Ability culture 139.5 91 139.5 89.927 0.00
Government support 132.607 91 132.607 51.358 0.00
Enterprise cooperation 107.236 91 107.236 31.589 0.00
School support 121.229 91 121.229 22.903 0.00
Value guidance 57.18 91 57.18 12.173 0.00
Error Ability culture 1227.225 94 1.417
Government support 2044.375 94 2.728
Enterprise cooperation 2692.055 94 3.409
School support 4185.686 94 5.127
Value guidance 3714.021 94 4.67
Sum. Ability culture 58276.064 96
Government support 54483.609 96
Enterprise cooperation 48789.769 96
School support 46862.164 96
Value guidance 55691.662 96
Total correction Ability culture 1366.458 95
Government support 2177.032 95
Enterprise cooperation 2799.277 95
School support 4307.064 95
Value guidance 3771.346 95

From the analysis of the data, it can be seen that the ANOVA performed by these five independent variables verified the main and interaction effects of the multifactor ANOVA, and the independent effects on the observed variables were presented, which had a more significant effect on the distribution of the observed variables, and it was clear that among these five variables, all of them were statistically significant. Therefore, it can be determined that all five statistical variables are indicators of variables that have a significant impact on the performance of Civics.

Chi-square test

SPSS 24.0 was run, the data in the Excel table was imported and the data was weighted by setting fixed class variables in the numerical and variable views of SPSS 24.0, then descriptive statistics were performed, the viewer gave cross-tabulations and corresponding chi-square tests to ensure the accuracy of the statistics, and the Fisher correction was used when the data were not satisfied.

The effectiveness analysis of competency development is depicted in Table 5. From the data in Table 5, it can be seen that the Pearson value in the total = 686, which is a large value to reflect the difference between the two variables. p = 0.001 < 0.01, the difference is relevant and statistically significant, so there is this conclusion that competence development has an impact on the performance of Civics.

Effectiveness analysis of ability culture

Value Df Gradual sig. (both side) Accurate sig (both side) Accurate sig (single side)
Pearson χ2 686.000a 5 0.00
Likelihood ratio 124.457 5 0.001
Fisher’s accurate test 0.00 0.00
Linear and linear combinations 190.791 1 0.00
N 96

Table 6 shows the validity analysis of government support. Combining the data in Table 6, it is easy to find that the p critical value is nearly 0 and Sig. < 0.01, which indicates that the government support factors that need to be validated are statistically significant in enhancing students’ performance in Civics.

Effectiveness analysis of government support

Value Df Gradual sig. (both side) Accurate sig (both side) Accurate sig (single side) Point probability
Pearson χ2 689.425a 8 0.00 0.00 0.00
Likelihood ratio 114.642 8 0.002 0.00 0.00
Fisher’s accurate test 0.00 0.00
Linear combinations 21.385 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
N 96

The results of the analysis of the effectiveness of business cooperation are shown in Table 7. From the data feedback in Table 7, it can be seen that the Pearson value in the total is equal to 646.123, which is a large value and can reflect the difference between the two variables. The calculated minimum expected count = 0.04 < 5, and the exact Sig. approximates zero < 0.01, which shows that the statistical significance of the effectiveness of corporate cooperation on the performance of Civics exists.

Effectiveness analysis of enterprise cooperation

Value Df Gradual sig. (both side) Accurate sig (both side) Accurate sig (single side) Point probability
Pearson χ2 646.123a 11 0.00 0.00 0.00
Likelihood ratio 112.468 11 0.002 0.00 0.00
Fisher’s accurate test 0.00 0.00
Linear combinations 20.745 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
N 96

Table 8 shows the validity analysis of college support. From the calculation of the results in Table 8, it can be seen that the minimum expected count = 0.05, which is significantly less than 5, which meets the requirements of the cardinality, so the value of the Pearson cardinality exact significance (two-sided) can be chosen. The asymptotic significance (two-sided) is close to zero, which shows the difference, so there is a statistical significance between the two variables.

Effectiveness analysis of college support

Value Df Gradual sig. (both side) Accurate sig (both side) Accurate sig (single side) Point probability
Pearson χ2 646.123a 12 0.00 0.00 0.00
Likelihood ratio 102.571 12 0.003 0.00 0.00
Fisher’s accurate test 0.00 0.00
Linear combinations 54.334 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
N 96

The validity test of value leadership is shown in Table 9. As the results in Table 9 can be calculated, the minimum expected count = 0.06 < 5, the exact Sig. The chosen value is approximately zero and less than 0.01, which can be concluded that there is a statistically significant difference between the two variables.

Effectiveness analysis of value guidance

Value Df Gradual sig. (both side) Accurate sig (both side) Accurate sig (single side) Point probability
Pearson χ2 557.547a 76 0.00 0.00 0.00
Likelihood ratio 103.187 76 0.003 0.00 0.00
Fisher’s accurate test 0.00 0.00
Linear combinations 45.571 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
N 96
Logistic regression analysis

Table 10 shows the logistic regression analysis of the level of dual entrepreneurial aspirations. The inclusion of variables with statistically significant chi-square tests in the logistic regression model of innovation and entrepreneurship aspirations reveals that value leadership is the most important statistically significant influencing factor, followed by government support and capacity development. Specifically, graduate students who received value leadership had approximately 14 times more innovative entrepreneurial aspirations than those who did not (OR=14.237).

Analysis of the logistic regression of innovative entrepreneurial ambition

Variable Walds P OR 95%CI
Value guidance
High vs low 5.969 0.013 14.237 1.696 120.459
Government support
High vs low 4.247 0.031 3.696 1.093 13.515
Enterprise cooperation
High vs low 0.177 0.048 0.597 0.037 3.084
School support
High vs low 3.686 0.037 3.501 0.815 12.433
Ability culture
High vs low 3.994 0.033 4.341 1.165 16.530
Constant 16.327 0.000 0.105

Graduate students with high cultural training were more likely to have high innovation and entrepreneurship aspirations than those with low cultural training (OR=4.341). The degree of innovation and entrepreneurship aspirations of graduate students with high government support was about 3.7 times higher than that of students with low government support (OR=3.696). In addition, there was a statistically significant impact of corporate cooperation and university support on innovation and entrepreneurial aspirations.

Conclusion

This paper combines logistic regression and ANOVA methods to study the five indicators that affect the integration path of Civic and Political Education and Dual Entrepreneurship Education. Selecting the current graduate students of a university as the experimental subjects, it is found that about 47.6% of the current graduate students have high innovation and entrepreneurship aspirations, and the graduate students who have high innovation and entrepreneurship ability, get support from the government and colleges and universities, keep cooperation with enterprises, and get value leadership are more likely to show high innovation and entrepreneurship aspirations. Innovation ability cultivation and value leadership are effective in improving the performance of Civics, in which value leadership is the most important and statistically significant influencing factor, and their innovation and entrepreneurship ambition is about 14 times higher than that of students who do not get value leadership. Therefore, in the path of the integration of Civic and Political Education and Dual Entrepreneurship Education, doing a good job of innovation value and ideological value leadership has a key role.

Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
1 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Scienze biologiche, Scienze della vita, altro, Matematica, Matematica applicata, Matematica generale, Fisica, Fisica, altro