Optimisation of highway vehicle occlusion recognition based on attention and multitasking approach
17 mar 2025
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Pubblicato online: 17 mar 2025
Ricevuto: 18 ott 2024
Accettato: 12 feb 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0180
Parole chiave
© 2025 Shifeng Feng, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Comparison of different methods for detecting occluded vehicles
Data set | Model | P/% | R/% | F1/% | MSE | MAE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COCO | Mask R-CNN | 79.33 | 82.29 | 80.81 | 0.04 | 0.06 |
Faster R-CNN | 84.69 | 84.17 | 84.43 | 0.02 | 0.04 | |
YOLOv7 | 89.75 | 88.74 | 89.32 | 0.02 | 0.02 | |
Our method | 93.28 | 92.47 | 92.82 | 0.01 | 0.02 | |
ApolloScape | Mask R-CNN | 84.25 | 86.54 | 85.41 | 0.03 | 0.06 |
Faster R-CNN | 86.69 | 88.15 | 87.36 | 0.03 | 0.05 | |
YOLOv7 | 89.51 | 90.33 | 89.51 | 0.03 | 0.04 | |
Our method | 92.23 | 93.82 | 92.62 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
Comparison of model detection results under different occlusion conditions
Occlusion rate | Method | Color precision/% | Vehicle type precision/% | Detection time/s |
---|---|---|---|---|
20% | Mask R-CNN | 79.08 | 87.22 | 1.04 |
Faster R-CNN | 76.33 | 72.23 | 1.46 | |
YOLOv7 | 82.81 | 73.52 | 1.22 | |
Our method | 91.74 | 93.49 | 0.29 | |
40% | Mask R-CNN | 80.13 | 79.45 | 0.93 |
Faster R-CNN | 75.62 | 86.51 | 0.77 | |
YOLOv7 | 82.77 | 89.52 | 0.61 | |
Our method | 90.06 | 89.06 | 0.44 | |
60% | Mask R-CNN | 80.45 | 80.94 | 0.55 |
Faster R-CNN | 83.92 | 78.25 | 1.94 | |
YOLOv7 | 76.76 | 83.49 | 0.74 | |
Our method | 94.56 | 88.67 | 0.21 | |
80% | Mask R-CNN | 78.77 | 81.47 | 1.28 |
Faster R-CNN | 82.36 | 84.22 | 1.18 | |
YOLOv7 | 84.58 | 87.11 | 1.92 | |
Our method | 92.52 | 88.16 | 0.53 |