Accesso libero

Numerical simulation and performance optimisation of in-cylinder friction of cylinder liner and piston ring in internal combustion engine based on deep neural network

 e   
17 mar 2025
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita
Scarica la copertina

Figure 1.

Cylinder liner - piston system and force
Cylinder liner - piston system and force

Figure 2.

Jacket force
Jacket force

Figure 3.

Oil film bearing area
Oil film bearing area

Figure 4.

Lubricating oil film
Lubricating oil film

Figure 5.

Basic units of long short tcrmmemory netw orks
Basic units of long short tcrmmemory netw orks

Figure 6.

Multi-scale temporal network structure
Multi-scale temporal network structure

Figure 7.

The thickness of the oil membrane under different barrels is changed
The thickness of the oil membrane under different barrels is changed

Figure 8.

The friction of the different barrels is changed with the crank shaft
The friction of the different barrels is changed with the crank shaft

Figure 9.

The friction loss power of different bucket levels varies
The friction loss power of different bucket levels varies

Figure 10.

The thickness of the oil film varies with the crank shaft
The thickness of the oil film varies with the crank shaft

Figure 11.

The friction of the crankshaft is changed by the friction of the crankshaft
The friction of the crankshaft is changed by the friction of the crankshaft

Figure 12.

The friction loss power is related to the change of the crankshaft Angle
The friction loss power is related to the change of the crankshaft Angle

Figure 13.

The thickness of the oil film is related to the change of the crankshaft
The thickness of the oil film is related to the change of the crankshaft

Figure 14.

The friction of friction is related to the change of crankshaft Angle
The friction of friction is related to the change of crankshaft Angle

Figure 15.

The friction loss power is related to the change of crankshaft Angle
The friction loss power is related to the change of crankshaft Angle

Figure 16.

Average friction coefficient prediction
Average friction coefficient prediction

Figure 17.

The friction of the piston ring group before and after optimization
The friction of the piston ring group before and after optimization

Figure 18.

The friction power consumption of the piston ring group is optimized
The friction power consumption of the piston ring group is optimized

The difference of each factor and the overall score of each level

Name Medium convex point offset Effective lubrication length (mm) Barrel height(μm)
Minimum oil film thickness
First level(i=1) 1.833 1.849 1.989
Second level(i=2) 1.881 1.874 1.892
Third level(i=3) 1.934 1.917 1.78
Aberration R 0.102 0.064 0.189
The friction loss of the top ring
First level(i=1) 0.332 0.311 0.306
Second level(i=2) 0.312 0.324 0.311
Third level(i=3) 0.286 0.32 0.303
Aberration R 0.038 0.001 0.004
Minimum oil film thickness
First level(i=1) 4 3 1
Second level(i=2) 3 2 2
Third level(i=3) 2 1 3
The evaluation index of the friction loss
First level(i=1) 4 1 2
Second level(i=2) 3 3 3
Third level(i=3) 2 2 1
Top ring type line parameter
First level(i=1) 7 4 3
Second level(i=2) 5 5 5
Third level(i=3) 3 3 4

Orthogonal optimization test factor level of piston ring type line parameter

Name Medium convex point offset Effective lubrication length (mm) Barrel height(μm)
Level 1 10% 5 10
Level 2 20% 5.4 14
Level 3 30% 5.8 18

The original scheme is compared with the proposed scheme

Name Medium convex point offset Effective lubrication length (mm) Barrel height(μm) Minimum oil film thickness(μm) Friction loss work(kW)
Original plan Unbiased shift 2.6 18 1.431 0.295
After optimization 35% 4.6 10 2.051 0.282

Orthogonal optimization test results of piston ring line parameters

Name Medium convex point offset Effective lubrication length (mm) Barrel height(μm) Minimum oil film thickness(μm) Friction loss work(kW)
Solution 1 10% 5 10 1.912 0.331
Solution 2 10% 5.4 14 1.829 0.325
Solution 3 10% 5.8 18 1.762 0.332
Solution 4 20% 5 14 1.859 0.312
Solution 5 20% 5.4 18 1.785 0.309
Solution 6 20% 5.8 10 2.015 0.310
Solution 7 30% 5 18 1.811 0.280
Solution 8 30% 5.4 10 2.021 0.289
Solution 9 30% 5.8 14 1.965 0.284
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
1 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Scienze biologiche, Scienze della vita, altro, Matematica, Matematica applicata, Matematica generale, Fisica, Fisica, altro