Research on the Innovative Model of English Teaching by Integrating Traditional Culture and Artificial Intelligence
29 sept. 2025
À propos de cet article
Publié en ligne: 29 sept. 2025
Reçu: 24 déc. 2024
Accepté: 21 avr. 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-1090
Mots clés
© 2025 Weiwei Sheng, published by Sciendo.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

AUC values of DKVMN-F variants on different datasets
| Model | ASSISTments2009 | Statics2011 | ASSISTments2012 | Synthetic-5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKVMN-F (basic) | 0.8288 | 0.8386 | 0.7412 | 0.8406 |
| DKVMN-F (without forget) | 0.8481 | 0.8586 | 0.7560 | 0.8610 |
| DKVMN-F (without learning) | 0.8463 | 0.8587 | 0.7519 | 0.8567 |
| DKVMN-F | 0.8669 | 0.8670 | 0.7757 | 0.8701 |
Comparison of model performance on ASSISTments2009
| Metric | MAP | Precision@1 | Precision@5 | Precision@10 | Recall@1 | Recall@5 | Recall@10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | |||||||
| Caser | 0.0303 | 0.0490 | 0.0451 | 0.0432 | 0.0028 | 0.0135 | 0.0249 |
| RCNN | 0.0327 | 0.0489 | 0.0481 | 0.0491 | 0.0022 | 0.0131 | 0.0269 |
| CosRec | 0.0375 | 0.0591 | 0.0544 | 0.0515 | 0.0038 | 0.0177 | 0.0354 |
| SCosRec | 0.0394 | 0.0604 | 0.0572 | 0.0537 | 0.0036 | 0.0211 | 0.0367 |
| HANN | 0.0431 | 0.0661 | 0.0614 | 0.0565 | 0.0041 | 0.0218 | 0.0389 |
Comparison of AUC on different data sets
| Model | ASSISTments2009 | Statics2011 | ASSISTments2012 | Synthetic-5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKT | 0.7437 | 0.8142 | 0.7197 | 0.7598 |
| DKT+forget | 0.7528 | 0.7540 | 0.7354 | 0.7621 |
| DKVMN | 0.8254 | 0.8395 | 0.7362 | 0.8370 |
| LFKT | 0.8569 | 0.8619 | 0.7605 | 0.8614 |
| Bi-CLKT | 0.8549 | 0.8628 | 0.7617 | 0.8646 |
| DKVMN-F | 0.8669 | 0.8670 | 0.7757 | 0.8701 |
Comparison of model performance on ML-1M
| Metric | MAP | Precision@1 | Precision@5 | Precision@10 | Recall@1 | Recall@5 | Recall@10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | |||||||
| Pop | 0.0694 | 0.1279 | 0.1122 | 0.1009 | 0.0055 | 0.0225 | 0.0369 |
| BPR | 0.0914 | 0.1472 | 0.1292 | 0.1183 | 0.0067 | 0.0301 | 0.0564 |
| FPMC | 0.1033 | 0.2004 | 0.1674 | 0.1448 | 0.0132 | 0.0454 | 0.0772 |
| GRU4rec | 0.1435 | 0.2512 | 0.2135 | 0.1914 | 0.0158 | 0.0618 | 0.1094 |
| Caser | 0.1512 | 0.2501 | 0.2189 | 0.1994 | 0.0146 | 0.0634 | 0.1118 |
| RCNN | 0.1681 | 0.2830 | 0.2491 | 0.2225 | 0.0191 | 0.0728 | 0.1267 |
| CosRec | 0.1895 | 0.3297 | 0.2831 | 0.2493 | 0.0211 | 0.0831 | 0.1441 |
| SCosRec | 0.1969 | 0.3447 | 0.2930 | 0.2585 | 0.0228 | 0.0886 | 0.1526 |
| HANN | 0.1971 | 0.3349 | 0.2971 | 0.2641 | 0.0238 | 0.0924 | 0.1613 |
Comparison of model performance on Gowalla
| Metric | MAP | Precision@1 | Precision@5 | Precision@10 | Recall@1 | Recall@5 | Recall@10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | |||||||
| Pop | 0.0226 | 0.0519 | 0.0359 | 0.0282 | 0.0051 | 0.0272 | 0.0407 |
| BPR | 0.0756 | 0.1637 | 0.0983 | 0.0736 | 0.0236 | 0.0747 | 0.1083 |
| FPMC | 0.0762 | 0.1556 | 0.0934 | 0.0694 | 0.0248 | 0.0726 | 0.1065 |
| GRU4rec | 0.0582 | 0.1049 | 0.0733 | 0.0781 | 0.0151 | 0.0514 | 0.0831 |
| Caser | 0.0922 | 0.1955 | 0.1145 | 0.0575 | 0.0315 | 0.0858 | 0.1228 |
| RCNN | 0.0768 | 0.1767 | 0.0973 | 0.0737 | 0.0269 | 0.0708 | 0.1030 |
| CosRec | 0.0982 | 0.2139 | 0.1187 | 0.0872 | 0.0335 | 0.0878 | 0.1305 |
| SCosRec | 0.1011 | 0.2192 | 0.1192 | 0.0892 | 0.0343 | 0.0918 | 0.1317 |
| HANN | 0.1027 | 0.2199 | 0.1246 | 0.0918 | 0.0367 | 0.0948 | 0.1347 |
