Research on the Innovative Model of English Teaching by Integrating Traditional Culture and Artificial Intelligence
Sep 29, 2025
About this article
Published Online: Sep 29, 2025
Received: Dec 24, 2024
Accepted: Apr 21, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-1090
Keywords
© 2025 Weiwei Sheng, published by Sciendo.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

AUC values of DKVMN-F variants on different datasets
| Model | ASSISTments2009 | Statics2011 | ASSISTments2012 | Synthetic-5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKVMN-F (basic) | 0.8288 | 0.8386 | 0.7412 | 0.8406 |
| DKVMN-F (without forget) | 0.8481 | 0.8586 | 0.7560 | 0.8610 |
| DKVMN-F (without learning) | 0.8463 | 0.8587 | 0.7519 | 0.8567 |
| DKVMN-F | 0.8669 | 0.8670 | 0.7757 | 0.8701 |
Comparison of model performance on ASSISTments2009
| Metric | MAP | Precision@1 | Precision@5 | Precision@10 | Recall@1 | Recall@5 | Recall@10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | |||||||
| Caser | 0.0303 | 0.0490 | 0.0451 | 0.0432 | 0.0028 | 0.0135 | 0.0249 |
| RCNN | 0.0327 | 0.0489 | 0.0481 | 0.0491 | 0.0022 | 0.0131 | 0.0269 |
| CosRec | 0.0375 | 0.0591 | 0.0544 | 0.0515 | 0.0038 | 0.0177 | 0.0354 |
| SCosRec | 0.0394 | 0.0604 | 0.0572 | 0.0537 | 0.0036 | 0.0211 | 0.0367 |
| HANN | 0.0431 | 0.0661 | 0.0614 | 0.0565 | 0.0041 | 0.0218 | 0.0389 |
Comparison of AUC on different data sets
| Model | ASSISTments2009 | Statics2011 | ASSISTments2012 | Synthetic-5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKT | 0.7437 | 0.8142 | 0.7197 | 0.7598 |
| DKT+forget | 0.7528 | 0.7540 | 0.7354 | 0.7621 |
| DKVMN | 0.8254 | 0.8395 | 0.7362 | 0.8370 |
| LFKT | 0.8569 | 0.8619 | 0.7605 | 0.8614 |
| Bi-CLKT | 0.8549 | 0.8628 | 0.7617 | 0.8646 |
| DKVMN-F | 0.8669 | 0.8670 | 0.7757 | 0.8701 |
Comparison of model performance on ML-1M
| Metric | MAP | Precision@1 | Precision@5 | Precision@10 | Recall@1 | Recall@5 | Recall@10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | |||||||
| Pop | 0.0694 | 0.1279 | 0.1122 | 0.1009 | 0.0055 | 0.0225 | 0.0369 |
| BPR | 0.0914 | 0.1472 | 0.1292 | 0.1183 | 0.0067 | 0.0301 | 0.0564 |
| FPMC | 0.1033 | 0.2004 | 0.1674 | 0.1448 | 0.0132 | 0.0454 | 0.0772 |
| GRU4rec | 0.1435 | 0.2512 | 0.2135 | 0.1914 | 0.0158 | 0.0618 | 0.1094 |
| Caser | 0.1512 | 0.2501 | 0.2189 | 0.1994 | 0.0146 | 0.0634 | 0.1118 |
| RCNN | 0.1681 | 0.2830 | 0.2491 | 0.2225 | 0.0191 | 0.0728 | 0.1267 |
| CosRec | 0.1895 | 0.3297 | 0.2831 | 0.2493 | 0.0211 | 0.0831 | 0.1441 |
| SCosRec | 0.1969 | 0.3447 | 0.2930 | 0.2585 | 0.0228 | 0.0886 | 0.1526 |
| HANN | 0.1971 | 0.3349 | 0.2971 | 0.2641 | 0.0238 | 0.0924 | 0.1613 |
Comparison of model performance on Gowalla
| Metric | MAP | Precision@1 | Precision@5 | Precision@10 | Recall@1 | Recall@5 | Recall@10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | |||||||
| Pop | 0.0226 | 0.0519 | 0.0359 | 0.0282 | 0.0051 | 0.0272 | 0.0407 |
| BPR | 0.0756 | 0.1637 | 0.0983 | 0.0736 | 0.0236 | 0.0747 | 0.1083 |
| FPMC | 0.0762 | 0.1556 | 0.0934 | 0.0694 | 0.0248 | 0.0726 | 0.1065 |
| GRU4rec | 0.0582 | 0.1049 | 0.0733 | 0.0781 | 0.0151 | 0.0514 | 0.0831 |
| Caser | 0.0922 | 0.1955 | 0.1145 | 0.0575 | 0.0315 | 0.0858 | 0.1228 |
| RCNN | 0.0768 | 0.1767 | 0.0973 | 0.0737 | 0.0269 | 0.0708 | 0.1030 |
| CosRec | 0.0982 | 0.2139 | 0.1187 | 0.0872 | 0.0335 | 0.0878 | 0.1305 |
| SCosRec | 0.1011 | 0.2192 | 0.1192 | 0.0892 | 0.0343 | 0.0918 | 0.1317 |
| HANN | 0.1027 | 0.2199 | 0.1246 | 0.0918 | 0.0367 | 0.0948 | 0.1347 |
