Accès libre

Assessment and Enhancement of Teaching Effectiveness of Piano Majors in Colleges and Universities Based on AHP Modeling

  
24 mars 2025
À propos de cet article

Citez
Télécharger la couverture

Figure 1.

The basic situation of the piano student
The basic situation of the piano student

Basic information of teachers

Teacher’s name Professor course Age Educational background Teaching age Learn the piano time
A Piano 28 Undergraduate 6 Primary school
B Piano 32 Undergraduate 8 Primary school
C Piano 44 Undergraduate 18 Junior high school
D Piano 32 Undergraduate 8 Junior high school
E Piano 29 Master 4 Primary school

The survey expert distribution list

At all levels The director of teaching at the secondary school Teacher who works in teaching Teaching manager Supervisor
N 6 12 8 8
Proportion 17.65% 35.29% 23.53% 23.53%

The statistical table of the results of the first level index experts

Primary indicator N Proportion
Teaching attitude 34 100%
Teaching content 34 100%
Teaching method 34 100%
Teaching effect 32 94.12%

Evaluation index of students’ quality of learning in piano class

Measure content and weight Measuring point Evaluation grade
A B C D
Performance skill (0.28) Timeliness 9.6 8.2 6.7 5.5
Rhythm 9.6 8.2 6.7 5.5
Posture 4.8 4.4 3.36 3
Emotional experience (0.35) Expression 9.6 8.2 6.7 5.5
Speed 9.6 8.2 6.7 5.5
Strength 9.6 8.2 6.7 5.5
Artistic ability (0.20) Play a piano concert 14.48 12.2 9.8 8
Accompany 9.6 8.2 6.7 5.5
Play the game 9.6 8.2 6.7 5.5
Piano theory foundation (0.085) Piano analysis 9.6 8.2 6.7 5.5
Piano teaching 9.6 8.2 6.7 5.5
Normal grade (0.085) Learning attitude 9.6 8.2 6.7 5.5
Back to class 9.6 8.2 6.7 5.5

The survey expert title structure table

Title category High level title Secondary title Intermediate title
N 10 12 12
Proportion 29.41% 35.29% 35.29%

Evaluation index of classroom teaching quality in a university

Primary indicator Weighting Evaluation criteria Weighting
Teaching attitude 0.18 On time, class, discipline, teachers, teaching 0.232
Strict requirements, strict management, strong sense of responsibility and fairness in class 0.187
Be fully prepared, be proficient in teaching and be full of emotions 0.314
Arrange the appropriate homework and revise it in time 0.140
According to the students’ need for guidance, patient answers are difficult 0.127
Teaching content 0.36 The idea, basic concept, basic principle, basic knowledge or skill is accurate 0.361
The key points are clear, the difficulty is clear, the content is refined, the logic is strong 0.232
To absorb the latest results of the subject, specify the appropriate extracurricular books and articles 0.154
The knowledge is wide, the information is large, the teaching content is enriched 0.128
Emphasis on teaching objectivity, theoretical contact practice 0.125
Teaching method 0.22 The teaching process is arranged properly and the teaching schedule is reasonable 0.195
Focus on the communication of teachers and students, be good at enlightening and induce, actively reform the teaching method, gradually 0.221
Chart specification, the amount of the book, hierarchical (non-multimedia teaching) 0.167
Emphasis on quality education, focus on cultivating students’ self-study ability and analyzing the problem 0.158
Using the teaching method properly, the advanced teaching method can be applied correctly under possible conditions 0.159
Sound, smooth and organized 0.1
Teaching effect 0.24 The students are serious, the classroom discipline is good, the teaching atmosphere is strong 0.175
Through the teaching of this course, the formation of the class is promoted or further 0.152
Can master the basic concepts, basic knowledge, basic principles and basic skills of this course 0.278
The learning method has improved and the ability of learning has been improved 0.342
In this semester, the general evaluation of classroom teaching of teachers in this course is subject to the teacher’s classroom teaching 0.053