Optimization Strategy of Piano Teaching Interaction Experience Based on Virtual Reality Technology
24 mars 2025
À propos de cet article
Publié en ligne: 24 mars 2025
Reçu: 30 oct. 2024
Accepté: 27 févr. 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0768
Mots clés
© 2025 Yuan Ren, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Finger continuous keystroke time and dexterity score
| Finger number (description) | Average | Standard deviation | Average score for flexibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1(L5) | 1536 | 64 | |
| 2(L4) | 1649 | 165 | 57 |
| 3(L3) | 1532 | 153 | 61 |
| 4(L2) | 1498 | 175 | |
| 5(L1) | 1536 | 174 | 63 |
| 6(R1) | 1409 | 154 | 70 |
| 7(R2) | 1324 | 134 | |
| 8(R3) | 1367 | 132 | 72 |
| 9(R4) | 1498 | 158 | 68 |
| 10(R5) | 1423 | 70 |
Score and accuracy in difficulty tests
| Difficulty | Round | Right-handed score | Left hand score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Speed | Accuracy/% | Speed | Accuracy/% | ||
| 1 | 1 | 57 | 99 | 51 | 95 |
| 2 | 59 | 95 | 53 | 87 | |
| 2 | 3 | 50 | 85 | 34 | 94 |
| 3 | 4 | 20 | 80 | 18 | 92 |
Teaching effectiveness
| Item | Content | Group | Number of cases | Percentage of cases |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acquired Knowledge or ability | Be able to feel the beauty of piano music and the pleasure it brings | Experimental group | 40 | 100.00% |
| Validation group | 16 | 88.89% | ||
| Understand the basic music theory of piano playing | Experimental group | 40 | 100.00% | |
| Validation group | 15 | 83.33% | ||
| Able to read music proficiently | Experimental group | 40 | 100.00% | |
| Validation group | 14 | 77.78% | ||
| Able to play music in the right rhythm | Experimental group | 40 | 100.00% | |
| Validation group | 15 | 83.33% | ||
| Able to play music with both hands | Experimental group | 40 | 100.00% | |
| Validation group | 16 | 88.89% | ||
| Learn some piano playing skills | Experimental group | 40 | 100.00% | |
| Validation group | 15 | 83.33% | ||
| The promoting effect of piano teaching on music learning | Promote interest in music learning | Experimental group | 38 | 95.00% |
| Validation group | 16 | 88.89% | ||
| Stimulate music learning potential | Experimental group | 40 | ||
| Validation group | 15 | 83.33% | ||
| Acquire music knowledge | Experimental group | 39 | 97.50% | |
| Validation group | 15 | 83.33% | ||
| Develop intelligence and train coordination skills | Experimental group | 40 | ||
| Validation group | 16 | 88.89% | ||
| Enhance aesthetic ability | Experimental group | 38 | 95.00% | |
| Validation group | 14 | 77.78% | ||
| Helps reduce stress and is good for physical and mental well-being | Experimental group | 39 | 97.50% | |
| Validation group | 14 | 77.78% |
The method of evaluation is analyzed in different genders
| Projects | Sexism | Number of cases | Average value | Standard deviation | F | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Descriptive language evaluation | Female | 20 | 3.1498 | 1.2648 | -5.4698 | 0.0000 |
| Male | 20 | 4.1699 | 1.0648 | |||
| Material rewards | Female | 20 | 2.8153 | 1.2985 | -1.6185 | 0.0956 |
| Male | 20 | 3.2169 | 1.2162 | |||
| Listen to play | Female | 20 | 3.8594 | 1.1694 | -4.1987 | 0.0000 |
| Male | 20 | 4.5169 | 0.7965 |
The method of teaching method is analyzed in different gender
| Project | Sexism | Number of cases | Average value | Standard deviation | F | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teaching | Female | 20 | 4.2495 | 0.8469 | -2.5415 | 0.0158 |
| Male | 20 | 4.5966 | 0.6048 | |||
| Demonstration | Female | 20 | 4.2655 | 0.8565 | -4.2679 | 0.0000 |
| Male | 20 | 4.7565 | 0.5155 | |||
| Direction | Female | 20 | 3.6155 | 0.8526 | -3.6456 | 0.0000 |
| Male | 20 | 4.1652 | 0.8546 | |||
| Practice | Female | 20 | 4.3564 | 0.8469 | -1.7595 | 0.0845 |
| Male | 20 | 4.5696 | 0.7065 |