A Constructive and Empirical Study of Personalized Teaching Quality Evaluation for Elementary School English Teachers
24 mars 2025
À propos de cet article
Publié en ligne: 24 mars 2025
Reçu: 13 oct. 2024
Accepté: 05 févr. 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0748
Mots clés
© 2025 Xinrong Sun, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The language evaluation of male and female teachers scores in each dimension
| Dimension | Man(n=37) | Female(n=333) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical knowledge | 2.24/0.89 | 2.22/0.92 | 0.100 | 0.921 |
| Principles and concepts | 2.11/1.01 | 2.04/1.04 | 0.363 | 0.717 |
| Language teaching | 2.18/0.88 | 2.36/0.90 | -1.139 | 0.255 |
| Evaluation impact and social value | 1.98/0.99 | 2.16/0.93 | -1.102 | 0.271 |
| Localization practice | 1.99/1.02 | 2.05/0.99 | -0.370 | 0.712 |
| Personal beliefs and attitudes | 2.07/0.97 | 2.17/0.97 | -0.600 | 0.549 |
| Grading and decision making | 2.11/0.99 | 2.10/1.03 | 0.068 | 0.946 |
| Build language evaluation | 2.10/0.93 | 2.13/0.94 | -0.177 | 0.859 |
| Management/assignment evaluation | 2.06/0.95 | 2.16/0.94 | -0.561 | 0.575 |
| Evaluation of evaluation | 2.03/1.01 | 2.01/0.97 | 0.142 | 0.887 |
| Total mean | 2.09/0.91 | 2.16/0.86 | -0.467 | 0.641 |
The regression analysis of teacher information on teaching evaluation
| Variable | Nonnormalized coefficient | Standard coefficient | t | Sig. | Common linear statistics | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard error | Trial version | Tolerance | VIF | ||||
| Gender | -0.115 | 0.075 | -0.121 | -1.895 | 0.078 | 0.875 | 1.153 |
| Educational background | -0.063 | 0.062 | -0.077 | -0.936 | 0.414 | 0.902 | 1.217 |
| Majors | -0.0011 | 0.081 | -0.012 | -0.124 | 0.923 | 0.934 | 1.096 |
| Teaching age | -0.136 | 0.055 | -0.205 | -3.295 | 0.034* | 0.413 | 2.332 |
| Job title | 0.086 | 0.059 | 0.156 | 1.515 | 0.187 | 0.567 | 1.898 |
| Teaching discipline | 0.005 | 0.020 | 0.032 | 0.186 | 0.879 | 0.639 | 1.521 |
| Class teacher | -0.031 | 0.067 | -0.036 | -0.425 | 0.621 | 0.747 | 1.436 |
| Class amount | -0.04 | 0.005 | -0.021 | -0.307 | 0.832 | 0.932 | 1.084 |
| School site | 0.025 | 0.086 | 0.019 | 0.396 | 0.865 | 0.911 | 1.032 |
| Personalized training | -0.329 | 0.071 | -0.275 | -4.213 | 0.000** | 0.934 | 1.076 |
The regression analysis of the evaluation of teaching quality evaluation
| Model | Nonnormalized coefficient | Standard coefficient | t | Sig. | Common linear statistics | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard error | Trial version | Tolerance | VIF | ||||
| Personalized teaching skills | 0.301 | 0.025 | 0.336 | 4.632 | 0.000** | 0.362 | 4.523 |
| Personalized teaching | 0.325 | 0.031 | 0.389 | 5.117 | 0.000** | 0.314 | 3.811 |
| Personalized teaching knowledge | 0.366 | 0.177 | 0.025 | 0.241 | 0.871 | 0.852 | 1.098 |
The results of the test results of different age groups
| Dimension | Age group | Age group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical knowledge | 20-30(n=55) | 41-50(n=164) | |
| 31-40(n=121) | 41-50(n=164) | ||
| 31-40(n=121) | 51-60(n=30) | ||
| Principles and concepts | 20-30(n=55) | 41-50(n=164) | |
| 31-40(n=121) | 41-50(n=164) | ||
| Language teaching | 20-30(n=55) | 41-50 (n=164) | |
| 31-40(n=121) | 41-50(n=164) | ||
| Evaluation impact and social value | 20-30(n=55) | 41-50(n=164) | |
| 31-40(n=121) | 41-50(n=164) | ||
| Localization practice | 31-40(n=121) | 41-50(n=164) | |
| Personal beliefs and attitudes | 31-40(n=121) | 41-50(n=164) | |
| Grading and decision making | 31-40(n=121) | 41-50(n=164) | |
| Build language evaluation | 20-30(n=55) | 41-50(n=164) | |
| 31-40(n=121) | 41-50(n=164) | ||
| Management/assignment evaluation | 20-30(n=55) | 41-50(n=164) | |
| 31-40(n=121) | 41-50(n=164) | ||
| Evaluation of evaluation | 31-40(n=121) | 41-50(n=164) | |
| Total mean | 20-30(n=55) | 41-50(n=164) | |
| 31-40(n=121) | 41-50(n=164) |
The language evaluation literacy comparison data of different age teachers
| Dimension | 20-30(n=55) | 31-40(n=121) | 41-50 (n=164) | 51-60 (n=30) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical knowledge | 2.45/0.84 | 2.42/0.89 | 2.04/0.90 | 2.06/0.98 | 5.763 | 0.001 |
| Principles and concepts | 2.34/0.98 | 2.27/1.05 | 1.81/0.97 | 1.93/1.12 | 6.707 | 0.000 |
| Language teaching | 2.49/0.84 | 2.51/0.92 | 2.19/0.89 | 2.22/0.89 | 3.728 | 0.012 |
| Evaluation impact and social value | 2.30/0.87 | 2.30/0.95 | 2.00/0.92 | 2.13/0.98 | 3.061 | 0.028 |
| Localization practice | 2.15/0.94 | 2.25/1.00 | 1.86/0.98 | 2.03/0.96 | 3.866 | 0.01 |
| Personal beliefs and attitudes | 2.24/0.92 | 2.34/0.96 | 2.00/0.97 | 2.15/0.94 | 3.082 | 0.027 |
| Grading and decision making | 2.22/1.05 | 2.27/1.01 | 1.91/1.02 | 2.20/0.92 | 3.469 | 0.016 |
| Build language evaluation | 2.30/0.88 | 2.29/0.93 | 1.94/0.93 | 2.15/0.97 | 4.142 | 0.007 |
| Management/assignment evaluation | 2.36/0.92 | 2.29/0.93 | 2.00/0.92 | 1.99/0.98 | 3.669 | 0.013 |
| Evaluation of evaluation | 2.13/0.98 | 2.21/0.96 | 1.83/0.97 | 1.93/0.97 | 3.978 | 0.008 |
| Total mean | 2.31/0.83 | 2.34/0.86 | 1.98/0.84 | 2.09/0.88 | 4.776 | 0.003 |
Language evaluation scale dimension and sample project
| Language evaluation literacy dimension | Sample project |
|---|---|
| Theoretical knowledge | Language skills (e.g. listening, speaking, reading, writing) are developing. |
| Principles and concepts | The concept of reliability (the accuracy and consistency of the evaluation). |
| Language teaching | How to use evaluation to guide learning or teaching goals. |
| Evaluation impact and social value | How to identify inappropriate evaluations. |
| Localization practice | How to determine whether the language evaluation is consistent with the local authentication system. |
| Personal beliefs and attitudes | Personal beliefs and attitudes to language evaluation. |
| Grading and decision making | How to explain the individual language ability of a particular score. |
| Build language evaluation | Select the appropriate grading criteria (the classification criteria). |
| Management/assignment evaluation | Use grading criteria to rate oral or writing performance. |
| Evaluation of evaluation | Use statistics to analyze the difficulty of a single project (problem) or task. |
The language evaluation literacy level of primary school English teachers
| Dimension | Mean | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Theoretical knowledge | 2.23 | 0.91 |
| Principles and concepts | 2.05 | 1.03 |
| Language teaching | 2.34 | 0.90 |
| Evaluation impact and social value | 2.14 | 0.93 |
| Localization practice | 2.04 | 0.99 |
| Personal beliefs and attitudes | 2.16 | 0.97 |
| Grading and decision making | 2.10 | 1.02 |
| Build language evaluation | 2.12 | 0.94 |
| Management/assignment evaluation | 2.15 | 0.94 |
| Evaluation of evaluation | 2.01 | 0.98 |
| Total mean | 2.16 | 0.86 |
