Application and Ethical Review of Artificial Intelligence Technology in News Writing and Editing and Distribution

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Classification of subject categories at the environmental cognition level

Level 1 Theme	Level 2 Theme	Level 3 Theme
Environmental cognition	Group impression	X1 Circle information
		X2 Portrait deviation
		X3 Group belonging
		X4 Group difference
	Stereotype	X5 Stereotype threat
		X6 Viewpoint polarization
		X7 Acoustovisual stimulus
		X8 Impression traction
		X9 Emotional infection
	Social relation	X10 Anxiety
		X11 Situational attribution
		X12 Self-worth identification

Coefficient of 1st regression of values at the environmental cognitive level

Model	Nonnormalized coefficient		Standard coefficient	t	Sig.
	B	Error
Constant	27.583	1.276		20.583	.000
X1	.556	.261	.264	4.578	.001
X3	.216	.090	.036	1.536	.177
X5	-.367	.088	-.081	-3.264	.019
X9	.106	.086	.046	2.076	.045
X11	-.238	.084	-.053	-1.983	.037
X12	.569	.091	.211	5.681	.000

Variance analysis of different educations on algorithmic news cognition

Group	Sample	Knowledge of algorithms		Algorithm privacy		Headline party		Information cocoon		News value		Plagiarism and infringement		Reinforce inequality
		M	σ	M	σ	M	σ	M	σ	M	σ	M	σ	M	σ
Primary school education or below	3	2.13	0.97	2.20	1.74	2.06	1.55	2.21	0.88	2.86	1.84	2.84	1.51	2.54	1.00
Junior high school	32	2.97	1.05	3.74	0.76	2.98	1.20	3.17	0.67	3.31	0.64	3.53	1.02	3.15	0.81
Senior high school	69	3.35	0.94	3.62	0.71	3.41	0.87	3.24	0.54	3.51	0.77	3.59	0.80	3.22	0.73
Junior college	213	3.54	0.87	3.70	0.65	3.55	0.76	3.27	0.46	3.47	0.85	3.66	0.73	3.38	0.77
College	362	3.88	0.74	3.88	0.69	3.61	0.70	3.25	0.47	3.58	0.72	3.70	0.78	3.52	0.75
Master	137	4.04	0.67	3.91	0.63	3.75	0.73	3.31	0.53	3.67	0.84	3.68	0.62	3.47	0.81
Learned scholar	20	4.15	0.61	3.96	0.58	3.96	0.65	3.26	0.38	3.76	0.89	4.04	0.70	3.38	0.74
ANOVA	F	10.34		4.02		4.94		5.31		5.02		6.21		1.53
	Sig.	0.001		0.001		0.000		0.000		0.001		0.000		0.751

Basic information of interviewees

Age structure
Under 18	3.17%
18-30	67.28%
31-50	22.58%
Over 50	6.97%
Nature of household registration
Urban area	69.75%
Rural area	30.25%
Educational background
Bachelor degree less	59.41%
Bachelor degree or above	40.59%
Total time of use
More than 3 years	33.57%
1 to 2 years	44.02%
Less than half a year	22.41%

Correlation analysis between environmental cognition and value measurement

		X1	X2	X3	X4	X5	X6	X7	X8	X9	X10	X11	X12
Value	P	.188**	.036	.065	-.047	-.092	.061	-.007	.006	.076	-.035	-.078	.165
	Sig.	.001	.685	.021	.088	.002	.069	.684	.852	.041	.473	.008	.000
	N	1260

Coefficient of 2nd regression of values at the environmental cognitive level

Model	Nonnormalized coefficient		Standard coefficient	t	Sig.
	B	Error
Constant	29.619	1.138		21.570	.000
X1	.531	.135	.152	4.135	.000
X5	-.291	.095	-.063	-2.742	.011
X9	.172	.093	.055	2.311	.040
X11	-.185	.095	-.057	-2.307	.029
X12	.535	.098	.163	5.455	.000