Model construction and simulation analysis of ecological corridors in landscape environment planning
et
17 mars 2025
À propos de cet article
Publié en ligne: 17 mars 2025
Reçu: 25 oct. 2024
Accepté: 03 févr. 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0218
Mots clés
© 2025 Lu Dong et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

The land use type constitutes the ecological source
Land use type | Area (km2) | Proportion (%) |
---|---|---|
Drainage pattern | 69.52 | 69.42% |
Woodland | 25.00 | 24.96% |
Garden land | 3.97 | 3.96% |
Ploughing | 0.84 | 0.84% |
Town land | 0.51 | 0.51% |
Green space | 0.23 | 0.23% |
Road | 0.08 | 0.08% |
Important ecological source landscape connectivity
Number | dL | Area (km2) | Proportion (%) |
---|---|---|---|
3 | 59.62 | 19.73 | 19.7 |
17 | 45.06 | 19.45 | 19.42 |
14 | 16.94 | 9.53 | 9.52 |
13 | 10.35 | 8.73 | 8.72 |
12 | 6.62 | 6.96 | 6.95 |
10 | 5.87 | 6.94 | 6.93 |
11 | 5.17 | 6.85 | 6.84 |
18 | 5.14 | 6.25 | 6.24 |
1 | 5.14 | 5.60 | 5.59 |
6 | 4.04 | 5.27 | 5.26 |
2 | 3.51 | 4.84 | 4.83 |
The structure of ecological bridge optimization is compared
Index | Basic ecological corridor | Optimize the ecological corridor | Variation rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|
0.5923 | 0.7852 | +32.57% | |
1.9814 | 2.3654 | +19.38% | |
0.7844 | 0.8562 | +9.15% | |
0.9564 | 0.9664 | -1.05% |