Model construction and simulation analysis of ecological corridors in landscape environment planning
y
17 mar 2025
Acerca de este artículo
Publicado en línea: 17 mar 2025
Recibido: 25 oct 2024
Aceptado: 03 feb 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0218
Palabras clave
© 2025 Lu Dong et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

The land use type constitutes the ecological source
Land use type | Area (km2) | Proportion (%) |
---|---|---|
Drainage pattern | 69.52 | 69.42% |
Woodland | 25.00 | 24.96% |
Garden land | 3.97 | 3.96% |
Ploughing | 0.84 | 0.84% |
Town land | 0.51 | 0.51% |
Green space | 0.23 | 0.23% |
Road | 0.08 | 0.08% |
Important ecological source landscape connectivity
Number | dL | Area (km2) | Proportion (%) |
---|---|---|---|
3 | 59.62 | 19.73 | 19.7 |
17 | 45.06 | 19.45 | 19.42 |
14 | 16.94 | 9.53 | 9.52 |
13 | 10.35 | 8.73 | 8.72 |
12 | 6.62 | 6.96 | 6.95 |
10 | 5.87 | 6.94 | 6.93 |
11 | 5.17 | 6.85 | 6.84 |
18 | 5.14 | 6.25 | 6.24 |
1 | 5.14 | 5.60 | 5.59 |
6 | 4.04 | 5.27 | 5.26 |
2 | 3.51 | 4.84 | 4.83 |
The structure of ecological bridge optimization is compared
Index | Basic ecological corridor | Optimize the ecological corridor | Variation rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|
0.5923 | 0.7852 | +32.57% | |
1.9814 | 2.3654 | +19.38% | |
0.7844 | 0.8562 | +9.15% | |
0.9564 | 0.9664 | -1.05% |