Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis of Bearing Based on Hidden Markov Model with Multi-Features
, y
30 mar 2020
Acerca de este artículo
Publicado en línea: 30 mar 2020
Páginas: 71 - 84
Recibido: 05 dic 2019
Aceptado: 14 ene 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2020.1.00008
Palabras clave
© 2020 Weiguo Zhao et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Some obtained observation values as the input of HMM_
States of faults | No. of observation values | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
Nor | 0.71 | 0.03 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0.05 | 0 |
R1 | 0.07 | 0.56 | .07 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.17 | 0 | 0 | 0.03 | 0 |
R2 | 0.23 | 0.08 | 0.35 | 0.2 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
R3 | 0.31 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.41 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0 | 0.07 | 0 |
I1 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.84 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0.05 |
I2 | 0.04 | 0.3 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.37 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
I3 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.65 | 0 | 0 | 0.15 |
O1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.97 | 0 | 0.01 |
O2 | 0.37 | 0.1 | 0.02 | 0.32 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 |
O3 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0 | 0.67 |
Statistics of test results of various fault states for different sample lengths_
Length of observation samples | States of faults | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nor | R1 | R2 | R3 | I1 | I2 | I3 | O1 | O2 | O3 | |
10 | 64.3% | 82.2% | 41.1% | 53.9% | 93.8% | 81.3% | 97.5% | 98.3% | 58.9% | 85.1% |
20 | 86.1% | 88.7% | 55.0% | 72.3% | 93.9% | 97.8% | 100% | 100% | 69.7% | 92.2% |
30 | 96.8% | 95.5% | 60.2% | 77.8% | 99.5% | 99.5% | 100% | 100% | 71.9% | 98.6% |
40 | 100% | 100% | 64.0% | 77.3% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 67.3% | 100% |
50 | 100% | 100% | 63.7% | 85.6% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 70.6% | 100% |
60 | 100% | 100% | 69.1% | 86.9% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 74.3% | 100% |
70 | 100% | 100% | 76.8% | 90.6% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91.7% | 100% |
80 | 100% | 100% | 83.6% | 91.2% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
90 | 100% | 100% | 83.2% | 94.4% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
100 | 100% | 100% | 90.7% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
110 | 100% | 100% | 95.7% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
120 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
130 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
140 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
150 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
The statistics of the overall training results using HMM_
States of faults | Nor | R1 | R2 | R3 | I1 | I2 | I3 | O1 | O2 | O3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accuracy | 100% | 99% | 95% | 90% | 100% | 99% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 99% |