Exploring the Ethical and Legal Boundaries of Artificial Intelligence in Forensic and Document Examination

[1]Jiang, Y., Li, X., Luo, H., Yin, S., & Kaynak, O. (2022). Quo vadis artificial intelligence?. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2(1), 4. JiangY., LiX., LuoH., YinS. & KaynakO. (2022). Quo vadis artificial intelligence?. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2(1), 4.Search in Google Scholar

[2]Ertel, W. (2024). Introduction to artificial intelligence. Springer Nature. ErtelW. (2024). Introduction to artificial intelligence. Springer Nature.Search in Google Scholar

[3]Surden, H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and law: An overview. Ga. St. UL Rev., 35, 1305. SurdenH. (2018). Artificial intelligence and law: An overview. Ga. St. UL Rev., 35, 1305.Search in Google Scholar

[4]Walters, R., & Novak, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence and law. In Cyber security, artificial intelligence, data protection & the law (pp. 39-69). Singapore: Springer Singapore WaltersR. & NovakM. (2021). Artificial intelligence and law. In Cyber security, artificial intelligence, data protection & the law (pp. 39-69). Singapore: Springer SingaporeSearch in Google Scholar

[5]Prek, M., & Lefèvre, S. (2019). “Administrative Discretion”,“Power Of Appraisal” And “Margin Of Appraisal” In Judicial Review Proceedings Before The General Court. Common Market Law Review, 56(2). PrekM. & LefèvreS. (2019). “Administrative Discretion”,“Power Of Appraisal” And “Margin Of Appraisal” In Judicial Review Proceedings Before The General Court. Common Market Law Review, 56(2).Search in Google Scholar

[6]Boone, A., Broughman, B., & Macias, A. J. (2019). Merger negotiations in the shadow of judicial appraisal. The Journal of Law and Economics, 62(2), 281-319. BooneA., BroughmanB. & MaciasA. J. (2019). Merger negotiations in the shadow of judicial appraisal. The Journal of Law and Economics, 62(2), 281-319.Search in Google Scholar

[7]Monahan, J., Metz, A. L., & Garrett, B. L. (2018). Judicial appraisals of risk assessment in sentencing. Behavioral sciences & the law, 36(5), 565-575. MonahanJ., MetzA. L. & GarrettB. L. (2018). Judicial appraisals of risk assessment in sentencing. Behavioral sciences & the law, 36(5), 565-575.Search in Google Scholar

[8]Gupta, S., & Kumar, M. (2020). Forensic document examination system using boosting and bagging methodologies. Soft Computing, 24(7), 5409-5426. GuptaS. & KumarM. (2020). Forensic document examination system using boosting and bagging methodologies. Soft Computing, 24(7), 5409-5426.Search in Google Scholar

[9]Ellen, D., Day, S., & Davies, C. (2018). Scientific examination of documents: methods and techniques. CRC Press. EllenD., DayS. & DaviesC. (2018). Scientific examination of documents: methods and techniques. CRC Press.Search in Google Scholar

[10]Devlin, C., Morelato, M., & Baechler, S. (2024). Forensic intelligence: Expanding the potential of forensic document examination. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Forensic Science, 6(5), e1528. DevlinC., MorelatoM. & BaechlerS. (2024). Forensic intelligence: Expanding the potential of forensic document examination. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Forensic Science, 6(5), e1528.Search in Google Scholar

[11]Angel, M., & Kelly, J. S. (Eds.). (2020). Forensic document examination in the 21st century. CRC Press. AngelM. & KellyJ. S. (Eds.). (2020). Forensic document examination in the 21st century. CRC Press.Search in Google Scholar

[12]Mathur, S. (2023). Questioned Documents Examination-Modern Procedures for Better Efficiency. Forensic Science and Human Rights, 248. MathurS. (2023). Questioned Documents Examination-Modern Procedures for Better Efficiency. Forensic Science and Human Rights, 248.Search in Google Scholar

[13]Sezonov, V. S., Fialka, M. I., Poltavski, E. M., Prokopenko, N. M., & Fomenko, M. V. (2022). Forensic Examination of Electronic Documents. Law, State & Telecommunications Review/Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicações, 14(2). SezonovV. S., FialkaM. I., PoltavskiE. M., ProkopenkoN. M. & FomenkoM. V. (2022). Forensic Examination of Electronic Documents. Law, State & Telecommunications Review/Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicações, 14(2).Search in Google Scholar

[14]Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., & Bollegala, D. (2020). Explanation in AI and law: Past, present and future. Artificial Intelligence, 289, 103387. AtkinsonK., Bench-CaponT. & BollegalaD. (2020). Explanation in AI and law: Past, present and future. Artificial Intelligence, 289, 103387.Search in Google Scholar

[15]Greenleaf, G., Mowbray, A., & Chung, P. (2018). Building sustainable free legal advisory systems: Experiences from the history of AI & law. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 314-326. GreenleafG., MowbrayA. & ChungP. (2018). Building sustainable free legal advisory systems: Experiences from the history of AI & law. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 314-326.Search in Google Scholar

[16]Jarrett, A., & Choo, K. K. R. (2021). The impact of automation and artificial intelligence on digital forensics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Forensic Science, 3(6), e1418. JarrettA. & ChooK. K. R. (2021). The impact of automation and artificial intelligence on digital forensics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Forensic Science, 3(6), e1418.Search in Google Scholar

[17]Hall, S. W., Sakzad, A., & Choo, K. K. R. (2022). Explainable artificial intelligence for digital forensics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Forensic Science, 4(2), e1434. HallS. W., SakzadA. & ChooK. K. R. (2022). Explainable artificial intelligence for digital forensics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Forensic Science, 4(2), e1434.Search in Google Scholar

[18]Costantini, S., De Gasperis, G., & Olivieri, R. (2019). Digital forensics and investigations meet artificial intelligence. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, i-229. CostantiniS., De GasperisG. & OlivieriR. (2019). Digital forensics and investigations meet artificial intelligence. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, i-229.Search in Google Scholar

[19]Nowotko, P. M. (2021). AI in judicial application of law and the right to a court. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 2220-2228. NowotkoP. M. (2021). AI in judicial application of law and the right to a court. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 2220-2228.Search in Google Scholar

[20]Lontai, M., Pamjav, H., & Petrétei, D. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Forensic Sciences Revolution or Invasion? Part II. Belügyi Szemle, 72(8), 1513-1525. LontaiM., PamjavH. & PetréteiD. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Forensic Sciences Revolution or Invasion? Part II. Belügyi Szemle, 72(8), 1513-1525.Search in Google Scholar

[21]Stahl, B., Carroll-Mayer, M., Elizondo, D., Wakunuma, K., & Zheng, Y. (2012). Intelligence Techniques in Computer Security and Forensics: at the boundaries of ethics and law. Computational Intelligence for Privacy and Security, 237-258. StahlB., Carroll-MayerM., ElizondoD., WakunumaK. & ZhengY. (2012). Intelligence Techniques in Computer Security and Forensics: at the boundaries of ethics and law. Computational Intelligence for Privacy and Security, 237-258.Search in Google Scholar

[22]Galindo Ayuda, F. (2025). Literacy, Judicial Justice and Artificial Intelligence. Revista Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônico, Florianópolis, 1(24), 2-30. Galindo AyudaF. (2025). Literacy, Judicial Justice and Artificial Intelligence. Revista Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônico, Florianópolis, 1(24), 2-30.Search in Google Scholar

[23]Kasahara, T. (2021). AI and Judicial Policy. In New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence: JSAI-isAI 2020 Workshops, JURISIN, LENLS 2020 Workshops, Virtual Event, November 15–17, 2020, Revised Selected Papers 12 (pp. 147-161). Springer International Publishing. KasaharaT. (2021). AI and Judicial Policy. In New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence: JSAI-isAI 2020 Workshops, JURISIN, LENLS 2020 Workshops, Virtual Event, November 15–17, 2020, Revised Selected Papers 12 (pp. 147-161). Springer International Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

[24]Seng, D., & Mason, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and evidence. Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 33, 241-279. SengD. & MasonS. (2021). Artificial intelligence and evidence. Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 33, 241-279.Search in Google Scholar

[25]Yaohui, J. I. N., & Hao, H. E. (2020). An artificial-intelligence-based semantic assist framework for judicial trials. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 7(3), 531-540. YaohuiJ. I. N. & HaoH. E. (2020). An artificial-intelligence-based semantic assist framework for judicial trials. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 7(3), 531-540.Search in Google Scholar

[26]Galante, N., Cotroneo, R., Furci, D., Lodetti, G., & Casali, M. B. (2023). Applications of artificial intelligence in forensic sciences: C urrent potential benefits, limitations and perspectives. International journal of legal medicine, 137(2), 445-458. GalanteN., CotroneoR., FurciD., LodettiG. & CasaliM. B. (2023). Applications of artificial intelligence in forensic sciences: C urrent potential benefits, limitations and perspectives. International journal of legal medicine, 137(2), 445-458.Search in Google Scholar

[27]Shi, S. (2024). Research on the practical approach and application influence of judicial artificial intelligence application under the modernization of judicial work. Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research, 12(1), 379-379. ShiS. (2024). Research on the practical approach and application influence of judicial artificial intelligence application under the modernization of judicial work. Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research, 12(1), 379-379.Search in Google Scholar

[28]Jeong, D. (2020). Artificial intelligence security threat, crime, and forensics: taxonomy and open issues. IEEE Access, 8, 184560-184574. JeongD. (2020). Artificial intelligence security threat, crime, and forensics: taxonomy and open issues. IEEE Access, 8, 184560-184574.Search in Google Scholar