Exploring the Ethical and Legal Boundaries of Artificial Intelligence in Forensic and Document Examination

Normalized weight value and ranking of ethical risk evaluation indicators

Criterion layer	Weight	Index level	Weight	Overall target weight	Sort
B1	0.154	C1	0.518	0.080	6
		C2	0.482	0.074	8
B2	0.437	C3	0.345	0.151	2
		C4	0.238	0.104	5
		C5	0.245	0.107	4
		C6	0.172	0.075	7
B3	0.305	C7	0.368	0.112	3
		C8	0.632	0.193	1
B4	0.104	C9	0.387	0.040	10
		C10	0.613	0.064	9

Calculation results of expert scores

Index level	Expert rating calculation results
	P	L	R″i
C1	0.484	0.386	0.438
C2	0.197	0.298	0.253
C3	0.922	0.892	0.907
C4	0.797	0.784	0.791
C5	0.722	0.938	0.837
C6	0.686	0.841	0.767
C7	0.611	0.592	0.602
C8	0.928	0.805	0.869
C9	0.602	0.308	0.478
C10	0.244	0.389	0.325

Detailed explanation of occurrence probability of ethical risk

The probability of a risk occurring	Assignment interval	Specify
Low	[0,0.2)	None occurred within the scope of the assessment, and similar projects are rare
Relatively low	[0.2,0.4)	None occurred within the scope of the assessment, and similar projects occur occasionally
Middling	[0.4,0.6)	Did not occur within the scope of assessment, but similar projects occur from time to time; It has occurred within the scope of the assessment, and similar projects occasionally occur
Relatively high	[0.6,0.8)	It happened within the scope of the evaluation, and similar projects happen from time to time
High	[0.8,1)	It has occurred within the scope of the assessment, and similar projects often occur

Index weight calculation results

Criterion layer	Weight	Index level	Subjective weight	Objective weight	Comprehensive weight
B1	0.168	C1	0.080	0.073	0.077
		C2	0.074	0.109	0.091
B2	0.477	C3	0.151	0.198	0.174
		C4	0.104	0.113	0.108
		C5	0.107	0.112	0.110
		C6	0.075	0.095	0.085
B3	0.253	C7	0.112	0.077	0.095
		C8	0.193	0.122	0.158
B4	0.102	C9	0.040	0.042	0.041
		C10	0.064	0.059	0.061

Index system of ethical risk evaluation

Evaluation index system of judicial ethics(A)	Project phase	Stakeholder	Specific factors of ethical risk
	Requirement identification(B1)	Judge	Abuse of power(C1)
		Party	Insufficient right of application(C2)
	Technology implementation(B2)	Judicial expert	Ignoring Technical Limitations(C3)
			Uncontrolled use of technology(C4)
			Disclosure of private data(C5)
		Party	The right to know is limited(C6)
	Outcome evaluation(B3)	Judge	Biased review(C7)
		Judicial expert	The review is not accurate(C8)
	Execution of judgment(B4)	Judge	Misjudge(C9)
		Party	Deficient trust index(C10)

Results of ethical risk assessment

Overall Objective	Criterion layer	Index level	Comprehensive weight (Wi)	Value at risk R″i	Weighted risk value (Wi*R″i)
A (0.691)	B1(0.057)	C1	0.077	0.438	0.034
		C2	0.091	0.253	0.023
	B2(0.400)	C3	0.174	0.907	0.158
		C4	0.108	0.791	0.085
		C5	0.110	0.837	0.092
		C6	0.085	0.767	0.065
	B3(0.194)	C7	0.095	0.602	0.057
		C8	0.158	0.869	0.137
	B4(0.040)	C9	0.041	0.478	0.020
		C10	0.061	0.325	0.020

Comprehensive risk grade evaluation

Criterion layer	Weighted risk value	The probability of a risk occurring	Index level	Weighted risk value	The probability of a risk occurring
B1	0.057	Low	C1	0.034	Low
			C2	0.023	Low
B2	0.400	Middling	C3	0.158	Low
			C4	0.085	Low
			C5	0.092	Low
			C6	0.065	Low
B3	0.194	Low	C7	0.057	Low
			C8	0.137	Low
B4	0.040	Low	C9	0.020	Low
			C10	0.020	Low

Statistics of each value

	λmax	n	CI	RI	CR
A	4.023	4	0.008	0.9	0.0089
B1	2.011	2	0.006	0	0
B2	4.009	4	0.005	0.9	0.0056
B3	2	2	0	0	0
B4	2.017	2	0.009	0	0