Digital Intelligence Technology-Driven Transformation and Innovation Research on Choreography Design

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Other sensory experiences

Performance element	Satisfaction	Number of people	Score	Percent
Perfume rain smell experience	Very satisfied	24	120	0.6
	Relatively satisfied	10	40	0.25
	Normal	4	12	0.1
	Not satisfied	2	4	0.05
	Very dissatisfied	0	0	0
Perfume rain meets the stage atmosphere	Very satisfied	25	125	0.625
	Relatively satisfied	11	44	0.275
	Normal	4	12	0.1
	Not satisfied	0	0	0
	Very dissatisfied	0	0	0

The audience analyzed the performance of the performance

Performance element	Satisfaction	Number of people	Score	Percent
Dance together with the overall shape	Very satisfied	22	110	0.55
	Relatively satisfied	10	40	0.25
	Normal	5	15	0.125
	Not satisfied	2	4	0.05
	Very dissatisfied	1	1	0.025
Stage lighting effect	Very satisfied	26	130	0.65
	Relatively satisfied	9	36	0.225
	Normal	3	9	0.075
	Not satisfied	1	2	0.025
	Very dissatisfied	1	1	0.025
Dance expression	Very satisfied	23	115	0.575
	Relatively satisfied	9	36	0.225
	Normal	4	12	0.1
	Not satisfied	3	6	0.075
	Very dissatisfied	1	1	0.025
Stage scheduling form	Very satisfied	24	120	0.6
	Relatively satisfied	8	32	0.2
	Normal	5	15	0.125
	Not satisfied	1	2	0.025
	Very dissatisfied	2	2	0.05

Statistics of the audience’s overall perception,

Audience perception	Group	Number of people	Percentage
Stage performance communication mode	Fine	25	0.625
	Good	7	0.175
	Normal	3	0.075
	Difference	3	0.075
	Very bad	2	0.05
Stage performance overall feeling	Fine	26	0.65
	Good	9	0.225
	Normal	3	0.075
	Difference	2	0.05
	Very bad	0	0

Performance of music audience satisfaction

Performance element	Satisfaction	Number of people	Score	Percent
Music, sound production effects	Very satisfied	23	115	0.575
	Relatively satisfied	11	44	0.275
	Normal	4	12	0.1
	Not satisfied	1	2	0.025
	Very dissatisfied	1	1	0.025
The experience of rhythm between music and light	Very satisfied	26	130	0.65
	Relatively satisfied	10	40	0.25
	Normal	2	6	0.05
	Not satisfied	1	2	0.025
	Very dissatisfied	1	1	0.025
The music matches the stage picture	Very satisfied	27	135	0.675
	Relatively satisfied	11	44	0.275
	Normal	1	3	0.025
	Not satisfied	1	2	0.025
	Very dissatisfied	0	0	0
The combination of music and performance style	Very satisfied	25	125	0.625
	Relatively satisfied	9	36	0.225
	Normal	4	12	0.1
	Not satisfied	1	2	0.025
	Very dissatisfied	1	1	0.025

Sample fixation time analysis

Region	Counting point	Time before first gaze/s		First fixation duration/s		Total fixation duration/s
		Mean value	Total value	Mean value	Total value	Mean value	Total value
Spatial interface element	28	1.846	51.688	0.745	20.86	1.615	45.22
Clothing elements	26	1.036	26.936	1.788	46.488	4.024	104.624
Item element	25	2.563	64.075	0.469	11.725	1.498	37.45
Stage composition	10	3.615	36.15	0.318	3.18	0.395	3.95
Lighting element	10	2.036	20.36	0.428	4.28	0.495	4.95
Scenery element	24	1.129	27.096	0.915	21.96	2.648	63.552
All spatial elements	1214	1.978	2401.292	1.348	1636.472	3.379	4102.106

The results of the S-W test of the overall eye movement index

Variable name	Median	Mean value	Standard deviation	Skewness	Kurtosis	S-W test
Time before first gaze	2.00184	1.97909	0.56514	0.31486	0.02796	0.94862
First fixation duration	1.34854	1.3409	0.22196	0.57964	1.03498	0.98348
Total fixation duration	3.39706	3.38583	0.61046	-0.39486	0.63486	0.98764