Acerca de este artículo
Publicado en línea: 21 mar 2025
Recibido: 18 oct 2024
Aceptado: 01 feb 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0676
Palabras clave
© 2025 Weibing Li et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Dynamic bending distance calculation and weighted value
| Dynamic bending distance | Node 1 | Node 2 | Node 3 | Support value | The value of its own reliability | Final fusion weighted value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Node 1 | 0 | 11.23 | 5.70 | 0.220 | 0.322 | 0.213 |
| Node 2 | 11.23 | 0 | 6.40 | 0.299 | 0.333 | 0.291 |
| Node 2 | 5.70 | 6.40 | 0 | 0.481 | 0.345 | 0.496 |
Comparison of the four evidence of the fusion
| Method | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yager | 0.3880 | 0 | 0.000034 | 0.6120 |
| Dempster | 0.9991 | 0 | 0.000086 | 0 |
| Murphy | 0.9994 | 0.000022 | 0.000648 | 0 |
| Zhang | 0.9994 | 0.000022 | 0.000322 | 0 |
| Ghiasi | 0.5146 | 0 | 0.000495 | 0 |
| Ours | 0.9996 | 0.00000009 | 0.000006 | 0 |
