Tobacco adulteration recognition study by hyperspectral data processing under machine learning
, , , y
17 mar 2025
Acerca de este artículo
Publicado en línea: 17 mar 2025
Recibido: 13 nov 2024
Aceptado: 15 feb 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0201
Palabras clave
© 2025 Hongliang Zhang et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

CNN model performance of different activation functions
Activation function | Correct rate | Average precision | Average recall | Average F1 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
correction set | verification set | test set | ||||
ReLU | 0.977 | 0.963 | 0.925 | 0.96 | 0.936 | 0.937 |
LeakyReLU | 0.989 | 0.997 | 0.913 | 0.848 | 0.844 | 0.845 |
Sigmod | 0.982 | 0.971 | 0.919 | 0.919 | 0.912 | 0.936 |
Tanh | 0.981 | 0.962 | 0.878 | 0.928 | 0.921 | 0.923 |
Modeling time
Methods | Modeling Time(s) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
SVM | RF | KNN | This model | |
RAW | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.012 | 0.0003 |
SG | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.012 | 0.0003 |
GWS | 0.062 | 0.043 | 0.011 | 0.00032 |
PCA | 0.057 | 0.038 | 0.009 | 0.00021 |
Identification of tobacco origin
Num | Model | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | KNN | 89.78% | 89.58% | 86.45% | 87.41% |
2 | RF | 92.78% | 93.12% | 92.56% | 92.88^% |
3 | Improved CNN model | 96.45% | 97.42% | 97.62% | 97.88% |
4 | Artificial | 81.23% | 82.31% | 84.51% | 83.64% |
Contrast between different convolution nuclei
Combination of number of convolution kernels | Correct rate | Average precision | Average recall | Average F1 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
correction set | verification set | test set | ||||
(128,128,128) | 0.983 | 0.98 | 0.855 | 0.856 | 0.855 | 0.851 |
(128,128,64) | 0.965 | 0.946 | 0.895 | 0.908 | 0.893 | 0.899 |
(128,64,64) | 0.96 | 0.956 | 0.876 | 0.88 | 0.876 | 0.872 |
(128,64,32) | 0.938 | 0.925 | 0.837 | 0.854 | 0.838 | 0.835 |
(64,64,32) | 0.931 | 0.929 | 0.877 | 0.881 | 0.873 | 0.873 |
(64,32,32) | 0.93 | 0.918 | 0.876 | 0.876 | 0.869 | 0.875 |
(64,32,16) | 0.913 | 0.885 | 0.831 | 0.853 | 0.834 | 0.833 |
(32,32,16) | 0.916 | 0.891 | 0.855 | 0.857 | 0.853 | 0.853 |
Contrast of different convolution nuclei
Convolution core size | Correct rate | Average precision | Average recall | Average F1 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
correction set | verification set | test set | ||||
(5,5,5) | 0.975 | 0.966 | 0.874 | 0.871 | 0.874 | 0.873 |
(5,5,3) | 0.965 | 0.964 | 0.905 | 0.904 | 0.904 | 0.904 |
(3,3,3) | 0.974 | 0.968 | 0.921 | 0.942 | 0.936 | 0.935 |
(3,5,3) | 0.954 | 0.928 | 0.832 | 0.856 | 0.835 | 0.834 |
(3,5,5) | 0.962 | 0.971 | 0.874 | 0.882 | 0.871 | 0.872 |