Cultivation and Evaluation System Construction of “Six Essentials” of Civics Teachers in the Context of Educational Digitization
und
24. März 2025
Über diesen Artikel
Online veröffentlicht: 24. März 2025
Eingereicht: 09. Okt. 2024
Akzeptiert: 03. Feb. 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0746
Schlüsselwörter
© 2025 Yuxin Meng et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

The evaluation index system weight table
| Primary indicator | Secondary indicator | Weight | Tertiary index | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B1 | 0.2134 | C1 | 0.2232 |
| C2 | 0.1285 | |||
| C3 | 0.3268 | |||
| C4 | 0.3215 | |||
| B3 | 0.2276 | C5 | 0.3526 | |
| C6 | 0.4786 | |||
| C7 | 0.1688 | |||
| B3 | 0.1442 | C8 | 0.3849 | |
| C9 | 0.3956 | |||
| C10 | 0.2195 | |||
| B4 | 0.1393 | C11 | 0.2256 | |
| C12 | 0.2967 | |||
| C13 | 0.4777 | |||
| B5 | 0.1299 | C14 | 0.5287 | |
| C15 | 0.1496 | |||
| C16 | 0.3217 | |||
| B6 | 0.1456 | C17 | 0.6398 | |
| C18 | 0.3602 |
The teacher’s cognition of “Six points”
| Item | Subdivision | N | Proportion |
|---|---|---|---|
| What is your understanding of the specific connotation of “Six points”? | Know very well | 5 | 14.29% |
| Compare Understanding | 18 | 51.43% | |
| Indeterminate | 7 | 20.00% | |
| Little knowledge of | 4 | 11.43% | |
| Have no idea | 1 | 2.86% | |
| Do you have a good grasp of the principle of “Six points” | Be good at grasping | 18 | 51.43% |
| Inclarity | 12 | 34.29% | |
| You can’t handle it very well | 5 | 14.29% |
Secondary dimensional weight table
| LLS,39 | ZJSAND,13 | WLS, 25 | PLS,9 | ...... | Weight mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | 0.1845 | 0.2147 | 0.2186 | 0.1847 | ...... | 0.2134 |
| B2 | 0.22 | 0.263 | 0.2075 | 0.2143 | ...... | 0.2276 |
| B3 | 0.1452 | 0.1332 | 0.1175 | 0.1240 | ...... | 0.1442 |
| B4 | 0.1478 | 0.1276 | 0.145 | 0.1328 | ...... | 0.1393 |
| B5 | 0.1054 | 0.1022 | 0.1107 | 0.1138 | ...... | 0.1299 |
| B6 | 0.1064 | 0.1143 | 0.1846 | 0.1745 | ...... | 0.1456 |
The teacher’s attitude to “Six points” qualities
| Item | Subdivision | N | Proportion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Do you think that the effect of ideological and political teaching should be promoted? | Need | 28 | 80.00% |
| Inclarity | 5 | 14.29% | |
| No need | 2 | 5.71% | |
| What do you think is the “six” literacy in the daily thought and political teaching? | Often | 24 | 68.57% |
| Little | 10 | 28.57% | |
| Never | 1 | 2.86% |
The method of teacher teaching in t “Six points”
| Item | Subdivision | N | Proportion |
|---|---|---|---|
| What is your choice in the implementation of “Six points” accomplishment teaching? | According to the teaching needs flexible selection | 25 | 71.43% |
| To stimulate students’ interest according to student requirements Settings | 7 | 20.00% | |
| Full use of the whole class | 3 | 8.57% | |
| Other | 0 | 0.00% | |
| How do you do “Six points” in ideological and political teaching? | Interest | 20 | 57.14% |
| Simple explanation | 3 | 8.57% | |
| Design guidance content to let students think | 10 | 28.57% | |
| Other | 2 | 5.71% |
The “Six points” literacy and ideological and political teaching
| Item | Subdivision | N | Proportion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Do you think of the difficulties in ideological and political teaching? (multiple-choice) | Lack of the right material | 22 | 62.86% |
| Lack of theoretical knowledge and guidance | 24 | 68.57% | |
| Take a large, time-consuming and time-consuming course | 20 | 57.14% | |
| Classroom teaching practice is limited | 22 | 62.86% | |
| Students are not interested | 18 | 51.43% | |
| The evaluation of teaching is not good | 20 | 57.14% | |
| Other | 6 | 17.14% | |
| What is your focus on ideological and political teaching? | Knowledge | 2 | 5.71% |
| Collectivism/patriotism and other spiritual culture | 28 | 80.00% | |
| The cultivation of students’ ability | 5 | 14.29% | |
| How does the student respond when you are integrated into the “Six points” qualities of high ideological and political teaching | Interested, but not engaged | 14 | 40.00% |
| I’m not interested in it | 3 | 8.57% | |
| Very interested and active | 18 | 51.43% | |
| What do you think is the specific value of “Six points” literacy for ideological and political teaching? (multiple-choice) | Teaching target setting | 26 | 74.29% |
| Teaching selection | 27 | 77.14% | |
| Teaching content design | 20 | 57.14% | |
| Teaching evaluation selection | 19 | 54.29% |
The evaluation system of the “Six points” literacy of the teacher
| Primary indicator | Secondary indicator | Tertiary index |
|---|---|---|
| Thinking teacher “Six points “accomplishment A | Politics is better B1 | Firm political faith C1 |
| Tough political force C2 | ||
| Strict political discipline C3 | ||
| Strong political responsibility C4 | ||
| Deep feelings B2 | Deep home C5 | |
| Persistent evangelism C6 | ||
| The love of the great C7 | ||
| Think new B3 | Developing dialectical thinking C8 | |
| Set up innovative thinking C9 | ||
| Strengthen strategic thinking C10 | ||
| The vision is wide B4 | Broad and open knowledge vision C11 | |
| The high distance international vision C12 | ||
| The depth of the history C13 | ||
| Self-discipline B5 | Good faith C14 | |
| Better than the mainstream thought C15 | ||
| We follow the ethics of the law C16 | ||
| Personality is positive B6 | The right personality C17 | |
| The number of people who learn C18 |
