Construction and Practical Exploration of Intelligent Teaching Evaluation System in Higher Vocational Colleges and Universities

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Teaching quality evaluation index system

Primary indicator	Expert weight	Secondary indicator	Expert weight
Teaching attitude	0.15	Job enthusiasm	0.3
		Take care of the course	0.3
		Tutoring	0.2
		Batch job	0.2
Teaching content	0.32	Highlight	0.4
		Content enrichment	0.2
		Contact practice	0.2
		Broaden your horizons	0.2
Teaching method	0.28	Multiplicity	0.2
		Student interaction	0.3
		Teaching by aptitude	0.3
		Hands-on ability	0.2
Teaching effect	0.14	Correct opinion	0.2
		Content clarity	0.3
		Easy to understand	0.4
		Ability to improve	0.1
Teacher quality	0.11	Language	0.3
		Discipline	0.3
		Pedagogy	0.2
		Master watch	0.2

The teaching evaluation statistics of the discrete after discretization

TID	Items
T1	{A2,B1,F2,G1,H1,I3,J3,K2,L2}
T2	{A1,B2,F2,G1,H1,I2,J1,K2,L2}
T3	{A2,B1,F2,G1,H2,I2,J2,K3,L2}
T4	{A3,B1,F3,G1,H2,I1,J2,K1,L1}
T5	{A2,B1,F1,G1,H3,I3,J2,K3,L3}
T6	{A1,B3,F2,G1,H2,I2,J3,K3,L4}
T7	{A2,B1,F2,G4,H3,I4,J4,K3,L4}
T8	{A4,B2,F2,G2,H2,I2,J3,K3,L3}
T9	{A2,B3,F3,G4,H2,I2,J4,K2,L2}
T10	{A3,B2,F4,G1,H2,I3,J2,K3,L2}

Analysis of platform effectiveness

Content
	1	2	3	4	5	Mean	Standard deviation	T	Sig.
Instructor (20)	0	4	4	3	9	3.85	0.742	1.357	0.194
	0.00%	20.00%	20.00%	15.00%	45.00%
Evaluation teacher (35)	0	3	7	13	12	3.97	0.911
	0.00%	8.57%	20.00%	37.14%	34.29%

Analysis of the effectiveness of the platform

Promote your own teaching
	1	2	3	4	5	Mean	Standard deviation	T	Sig.
Instructor (20)	1	1	2	6	10	4.15	0.652	2.345	0.022
	5%	5%	10%	30%	50%
Evaluation teacher (35)	0	3	6	18	8	3.89	0.834
	0	8.57%	17.14%	51.43%	22.86%

Teaching evaluation index code list

Teacher’s moral performance (10)		Teaching attitude (20 points)		Teaching (30 points)		Teaching method (20 points)		Teaching effect (20 points)		Score (100 points)
Value	Code	Value	Code	Value	Code	Value	Code	Value	Code	Value	Code
10	G1	19-20	H1	30	I1	20	J1	20	K1	95-100	L1
8-9	G2	16-18	H2	28-29	I2	18-19	J2	18-19	K2	85-94	L2
6-7	G3	13-15	H3	26-27	I3	14-17	J3	14-17	K3	81-84	L3
4-5	G4	9-12	H4	29-25	I4	9-13	J4	9-13	K4	71-80	L4
0-4	G5	0-8	H5	0-18	I5	0-8	J5	0-8	K5	60-70	L5

Teaching evaluation information statistics

Teacher number	Teacher age	Teacher performance	Teaching attitude	Teaching content	Teaching method	Teaching effect	Evaluation score
0026	31	9	16	27	18	18	88
0047	30	10	15	28	17	16	86
0055	31	9	15	27	18	17	86
0133	32	10	16	26	19	18	89
0156	30	9	15	26	17	19	86
0157	32	9	17	27	18	18	89
0158	33	10	19	28	19	17	93
0159	41	9	18	29	17	16	89
0176	40	9	19	28	18	17	91
0211	32	10	18	28	16	17	89

Mining results

Serial number	Association rule	Support	Confidence
1	I2,K2→L2	25.4%	98%
2	F1→A1	29.5%	98%
3	J2,K2→L2	27.8%	97%
4	J2,L2→K2	27.8%	92%
5	H2,L2→K2	28.5%	91%
6	J3,L3→H2	29.3%	90%
7	J2,K2→H2	25.7%	89%
8	I2,L2→K2	25.7%	89%
9	J2,L2→H2	27.7%	88%
10	K2,L2→H2	28.6%	88%
11	I3,L3→H2	27%	87%
12	I2→L2	29.3%	86%
13	A1,L3→H2	27.4%	87%
14	H2,J3→L3	29.5%	85%
15	A1,K3→J3	26%	84%
16	B2,H2→A1	29.3%	83%