Discussion on Innovative Teaching Methods for Industry-Education Integration in Colleges and Universities in the Context of Interactive Digital Media
, , und
21. März 2025
Über diesen Artikel
Online veröffentlicht: 21. März 2025
Eingereicht: 23. Okt. 2024
Akzeptiert: 30. Jan. 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0619
Schlüsselwörter
© 2025 Liang Wu et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Factors for the fusion of production
| Primary dimension | Secondary dimension |
|---|---|
| Entrepreneurship will cultivate the dimension | Top college vision(A1) |
| University policy positioning(A2) | |
| High-level entrepreneurship(A3) | |
| Explore dimensions of entrepreneurial practice | Funding pressure(A4) |
| Earnings expectations(A5) | |
| Entrepreneurship(A6) | |
| Construction of entrepreneurship system(A7) | |
| Business operation(A8) | |
| Entrepreneurship ability ascension dimensions | Business endowment formation(A9) |
| Business culture(A10) | |
| Business value presentation(A11) | |
| Create dimensions of entrepreneurial environment | Social transformation(A12) |
| Entrepreneurial policy incentives(A13) | |
| Technical market demand(A14) |
The relationship between language variables and fuzzy Numbers
| Linguistic Variable | The relative value of the three elements |
|---|---|
| No Influence | (0,0.1,0.3) |
| Very Low Influence | (0.1,0.3,0.5) |
| Low influence | (0.3,0.5,0.7) |
| High Influence | (0.5,0.7,0.9) |
| Very High Influence | (0.7,0.9,1.0) |
The integrated matrix of the influence of the production and education
| Factor | A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 | A5 | A6 | A7 | A8 | A9 | A10 | A11 | A12 | A13 | A14 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 0.094 | 0.091 | 0.170 | 0.121 | 0.154 | 0.205 | 0.158 | 0.210 | 0.133 | 0.156 | 0.148 | 0.057 | 0.054 | 0.062 |
| A2 | 0.226 | 0.111 | 0.286 | 0.239 | 0.270 | 0.297 | 0.252 | 0.316 | 0.218 | 0.222 | 0.270 | 0.08 | 0.101 | 0.102 |
| A3 | 0.232 | 0.138 | 0.187 | 0.203 | 0.265 | 0.309 | 0.254 | 0.327 | 0.246 | 0.258 | 0.275 | 0.086 | 0.080 | 0.080 |
| A4 | 0.173 | 0.116 | 0.260 | 0.146 | 0.255 | 0.279 | 0.236 | 0.291 | 0.194 | 0.216 | 0.227 | 0.068 | 0.079 | 0.067 |
| A5 | 0.215 | 0.145 | 0.275 | 0.232 | 0.191 | 0.312 | 0.248 | 0.322 | 0.230 | 0.254 | 0.249 | 0.086 | 0.081 | 0.080 |
| A6 | 0.115 | 0.083 | 0.164 | 0.120 | 0.158 | 0.131 | 0.152 | 0.221 | 0.147 | 0.128 | 0.147 | 0.050 | 0.047 | 0.060 |
| A7 | 0.155 | 0.113 | 0.200 | 0.212 | 0.228 | 0.240 | 0.132 | 0.268 | 0.198 | 0.173 | 0.196 | 0.064 | 0.062 | 0.066 |
| A8 | 0.187 | 0.167 | 0.251 | 0.208 | 0.274 | 0.294 | 0.193 | 0.226 | 0.260 | 0.259 | 0.27 | 0.081 | 0.087 | 0.088 |
| A9 | 0.162 | 0.098 | 0.186 | 0.203 | 0.215 | 0.229 | 0.160 | 0.239 | 0.137 | 0.230 | 0.211 | 0.058 | 0.066 | 0.057 |
| A10 | 0.143 | 0.112 | 0.223 | 0.210 | 0.239 | 0.257 | 0.169 | 0.281 | 0.233 | 0.153 | 0.253 | 0.064 | 0.066 | 0.068 |
| A11 | 0.172 | 0.132 | 0.243 | 0.228 | 0.259 | 0.276 | 0.193 | 0.299 | 0.236 | 0.229 | 0.180 | 0.089 | 0.082 | 0.082 |
| A12 | 0.199 | 0.166 | 0.216 | 0.143 | 0.175 | 0.204 | 0.166 | 0.224 | 0.143 | 0.153 | 0.167 | 0.048 | 0.104 | 0.077 |
| A13 | 0.186 | 0.189 | 0.311 | 0.268 | 0.296 | 0.321 | 0.250 | 0.346 | 0.252 | 0.259 | 0.300 | 0.121 | 0.073 | 0.134 |
| A14 | 0.247 | 0.220 | 0.317 | 0.256 | 0.315 | 0.338 | 0.264 | 0.364 | 0.277 | 0.283 | 0.311 | 0.138 | 0.145 | 0.079 |
Indexes and rankings
| Factor | Influence degree | Rank | Influence degree | Rank | Center degree | Rank | Reason | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 1.813 | 13 | 2.506 | 10 | 4.319 | 13 | -0.693 | 12 |
| A2 | 2.99 | 3 | 1.881 | 11 | 4.871 | 10 | 1.109 | 3 |
| A3 | 2.94 | 4 | 3.289 | 3 | 6.229 | 2 | -0.349 | 6 |
| A4 | 2.607 | 8 | 2.789 | 9 | 5.396 | 6 | -0.182 | 5 |
| A5 | 2.92 | 5 | 3.294 | 4 | 6.214 | 3 | -0.374 | 7 |
| A6 | 1.723 | 14 | 3.692 | 2 | 5.415 | 7 | -1.969 | 14 |
| A7 | 2.307 | 10 | 2.827 | 8 | 5.134 | 9 | -0.52 | 10 |
| A8 | 2.845 | 6 | 3.934 | 1 | 6.779 | 1 | -1.089 | 13 |
| A9 | 2.251 | 11 | 2.904 | 7 | 5.155 | 8 | -0.653 | 11 |
| A10 | 2.471 | 9 | 2.973 | 6 | 5.444 | 5 | -0.502 | 8 |
| A11 | 2.7 | 7 | 3.204 | 5 | 5.904 | 4 | -0.504 | 9 |
| A12 | 2.185 | 12 | 1.090 | 14 | 3.275 | 14 | 1.095 | 4 |
| A13 | 3.306 | 2 | 1.127 | 12 | 4.433 | 12 | 2.179 | 2 |
| A14 | 3.554 | 1 | 1.102 | 13 | 4.656 | 11 | 2.452 | 1 |
Configuration analysis results
| Conditional variable | Configuration solution | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Path 1 | Path 2 | Path 3 | Path 4 | Path 5 | |
| Enterprise size | ¢ | © | © | ¢ | © |
| Subject type | © | ¢ | ¢ | ||
| Project driver | © | ¢ | © | ||
| Project action | © | © | |||
| Item constraint | © | © | © | © | |
| Original coverage | 0.280365 | 0.268541 | 0.405123 | 0.111258 | 0.201543 |
| Unique coverage | 0.190365 | 0.052364 | 0.025712 | 0.022365 | 0.032542 |
| consistency | 0.954036 | 0.903254 | 0.941985 | 0.952356 | 0.905841 |
| Total consistency | 0.913259 | ||||
| Total coverage | 0.798051 | ||||
The necessity analysis of individual conditions
| Result variable | The production of the fusion project has achieved high performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Conditional variables (“not” for logical operations) | Consistency | Coverage | |
| Enterprise size | Size | 0.62414 | 0.60323 |
| ~Size | 0.37575 | 0.59263 | |
| Subject type | Discipline | 0.53368 | 0.57107 |
| ~Discipline | 0.46634 | 0.63545 | |
| Project driver | Impetus | 0.76606 | 0.89189 |
| ~Impetus | 0.52205 | 0.64438 | |
| Project action | Measure | 0.77131 | 0.87775 |
| ~Measure | 0.52001 | 0.65825 | |
| Item constraint | Restraint | 0.79602 | 0.87487 |
| ~Restraint | 0.53303 | 0.70224 | |