Discussion on the Construction of Packaging Design Curriculum under the Perspective of Multidisciplinary Integration
17. März 2025
Über diesen Artikel
Online veröffentlicht: 17. März 2025
Eingereicht: 25. Okt. 2024
Akzeptiert: 17. Feb. 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0240
Schlüsselwörter
© 2025 Kecheng Zhang, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Packaging design course evaluation system
Dimension | Index | Code |
---|---|---|
Teaching method | Innovative and flexible | T1 |
Teacher and student | T2 | |
The teaching method is vivid and intuitive | T3 | |
Actively expand multi-disciplinary knowledge | T4 | |
Combined theory practice | T5 | |
Teaching ability | Multidisciplinary integration teaching is vivid and concise | T6 |
Multidisciplinary concepts are clear and accurate | T7 | |
The theoretical depth and breadth are moderate | T8 | |
Focus on the knowledge of the subject | T9 | |
Teaching attitude | Fully prepare the teaching plan | T10 |
The teacher’s teaching goal is clear | T11 | |
Teachers have higher vocational literacy | T12 | |
Teaching quality | Student performance | T13 |
Learning ability culture | T14 | |
Student learning | T15 | |
Students’ interest in the course | T16 |
Evaluation index weight distribution
Dimension | Index | Weight |
---|---|---|
Teaching method (0.3056) | Innovative and flexible(T1) | 0.0615 |
Teacher and student(T2) | 0.0598 | |
The teaching method is vivid and intuitive(T3) | 0.0572 | |
Actively expand multi-disciplinary knowledge(T4) | 0.0714 | |
Combined theory practice(T5) | 0.0557 | |
Teaching ability ( |
Multidisciplinary integration teaching is vivid and concise(T6) | |
Multidisciplinary concepts are clear and accurate(T7) | ||
The theoretical depth and breadth are moderate(T8) | 0.0834 | |
Focus on the knowledge of the subject(T9) | ||
Teaching attitude (0.1475) | Fully prepare the teaching plan(T10) | 0.0476 |
The teacher’s teaching goal is clear(T11) | 0.0502 | |
Teachers have higher vocational literacy(T12) | 0.0497 | |
Teaching quality (0.2042) | Student performance(T13) | 0.0473 |
Learning ability culture(T14) | 0.0514 | |
Student learning(T15) | 0.0534 | |
Students’ interest in the course(T16) | 0.0521 |
Packaging design course teaching effect
Dimension | Index | Means | Std. | T | Sig. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Course objectives | Concreteness | 3.514 | 1.015 | 1.325 | 0.001 |
Foundational | 3.827 | 1.248 | 1.464 | 0.003 | |
Teaching content | Mastery | 3.884 | 0.562 | 1.362 | 0.002 |
Professional | 3.862 | 1.104 | 1.876 | 0.004 | |
Course implement | Suitability | 4.283 | 1.107 | 2.399 | 0.007 |
Diversity | 4.105 | 1.136 | 1.613 | 0.008 | |
Teaching evaluation | Objectivity | 3.828 | 0.953 | 1.908 | 0.003 |
Development | 3.981 | 1.194 | 2.221 | 0.005 |