An Innovative Development Model of Open Education Teaching Management in Universities Based on WSR Methodology

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Main contents of the WSR methodology

Name	Meaning	Core problem	Compliance criterion	Purpose
Physics	The law of the world of objective error(Define the nature of things)	What is it	True and reliable	Natural science	Sanity
Reason	(Effective handling of transactions)Human relationship	How to do	Effective and reasonable	Teaching engineering	Rational reasoning
Hermit	Human relationship(Consider the factors of people)	What should be done	Cooperation and fairness	Management science, Social science	General understanding

The education management model evaluates cloud parameters

Primary indicator	Evaluation cloud parameter	Secondary indicator	Evaluation cloud parameter
Physics	(07.24,0.214,0.108)	Facilities	(4.71,0.386,0.109)
		Preparation	(7.57,0.182,0.179)
		Management content	(8.92,0.221,0.061)
		Teaching project	(5.65,0.181,0.392)
Reason	(8.21,0.0575,0.114)	Management degree	(5.67,0.397,0.273)
		Management mechanism	(8.27,0.292,0.089)
		Management service content	(8.76,0.454,0.011)
Hermit	(8.81,0.362,0.162)	Relationship coordination	(7.73,0.224,0.071)
		Personal quality	(8.24,0.452,0.214)
		Learning satisfaction	(7.89,0.316,0.457)
		Management concept	(8.11,0.198,0.013)

Two schools, education management level grade one index score

Primary indicator	Weighting	Class of colleges and universities(W1a)	Secondary school(W1b)
Physics	0.412	4.13	3.64
Reason	0.359	3.72	3.52
Hermit	0.229	4.08	3.41
The weighted assessment of the two schools is the average score		4.0	3.5

Open education teaching management cloud similarity

Capacity rating	L1	L2	L3	L4	L5
Similarity	6.9E-48	1.28E-14	2.05E-02	0.3451	0.014

Matched sample statistics

		Mean	N	Std Deviation	Std Eror Mean
Pair1	Physics 1	4.16	40	.99612	.06814
	Physics 2	3.65	40	.67567	.03622
Pair2	Reason 1	3.71	40	.84723	.05763
	Reason 2	3.52	40	.76774	.04922
Pair3	Hermit 1	4.06	40	1.32161	.06813
	Hermit 2	3.73	40	.84551	.063332

Matched sample

		Paired Differenes					t	df	Sig
		Mean	Std.Deviation	Std.Error Mean	95%Confidence Interval of the Difference
					Lower	Upper
Pair1	Physics 1	-.535	1.21	.07576	-.6041	-.2976	-5.8**	40	.009
	Physics 2
Pair2	Reason 1	-.208	1.04	.08121	-.3013	-.0452	-2.143	40	.029
	Reason 2
Pair3	Hermit 1	-.455	1.36	.08667	-.8115	-.369	-2.137	40	.576
	Hermit 2

Open education teaching management evaluation index system

Primary indicator	Secondary indicator
Physics	Facilities
	Preparation
	Management content
	Teaching project
Reason	Management degree
	Management mechanism
	Management service content
Hermit	Relationship coordination
	Personal quality
	Learning satisfaction
	Management concept

The combination weights of each index

Primary indicator	Subjective weightω1	Objective weightω2	Composite weightW	Secondary indicator	Subjective weightω1	Objective weightω2	Composite weightW
Physics	0.2457	0.2382	0.2391	Facilities	0.3478	0.3741	0.3551
				Preparation	0.2951	0.2814	0.2681
				Management content	0.2115	0.1984	0.2256
				Teaching project	0.1456	0.1461	0.1512
Reason	0.4321	0.4767	0.4584	Management degree	0.4582	0.3678	0.2961
				Management mechanism	0.3579	0.3876	0.4722
				Management service content	0.1839	0.2446	0.2317
Hermit	0.3222	0.2851	0.3025	Relationship coordination	0.3562	0.3157	0.2875
				Personal quality	0.2677	0.2591	0.3153
				Learning satisfaction	0.1941	0.2378	0.1877
				Management concept	0.182	0.1894	0.2095

The teaching management evaluates the standard cloud parameters

Capacity rating	Interval division	Standard cloud parameter
Initial stage L1	[0,2)	(1,0.333,0.05)
Growth stage L2	[2,4)	(1,0.333,0.05)
Improvement phase L3	[4,6)	(1,0.333,0.05)
Mature phase L4	[6,8)	(1,0.333,0.05)
Optimization phase L5	[8,10]	(1,0.333,0.05)

Two schools, education management level index rating

Primary indicator	weighting	Secondary indicator	weighting	Class of colleges and universities	Secondary school
Physics	0.412	Facilities	0.0078	4.2	3.5
		Preparation	0.2123	4.5	3.0
		Management content	0.0577	4.3	3.4
		Teaching project	0.1342	3.5	3.8
Reason	0.359	Management degree	0.0178	2.4	3.1
		Management mechanism	0.2453	4.5	3.5
		Management service content	0.0959	4.0	3.6
Hermit	0.229	Relationship coordination	0.0561	4.1	3.2
		Personal quality	0.1153	4.0	3.5
		Learning satisfaction	0.0245	4.5	3.8
		Management concept	0.0331	4.2	3.1