Open Access

A Study on the Innovative Application of Multimedia Technology in Piano Teaching and Students’ Acceptance

 and   
Mar 17, 2025

Cite
Download Cover

Figure 1.

Kano model
Kano model

Figure 2.

Coordinates of better-worse coefficients
Coordinates of better-worse coefficients

Independent sample T test results after the experiment

Project Levin variance equivalence test Average equivalent T test
Assumption F Sig. t df Sig.(2-tailed) Mean difference Std. error difference 95% CI
Lower limit Upper limit
Musical knowledge Equal variances 8.364 0.005 2.423 58 0.037 2.083 1.128 -4.245 -0.356
Unequal variances 2.423 57.796 0.037 2.083 1.128 -4.245 -0.356
Spectrum recognition ability Equal variances 4.235 0.346 0.849 58 0.024 3.042 1.464 -5.273 -2.268
Unequal variances 0.849 57.754 0.024 3.042 1.464 -5.273 -2.268
Basic piano skills Equal variances 6.147 0.027 1.526 58 0.042 1.954 1.441 -3.252 -1.981
Unequal variances 1.526 57.934 0.042 1.954 1.441 -3.252 -1.981
Performance techniques Equal variances 2.517 0.521 1.828 58 0.028 1.616 0.947 -2.326 -1.722
Unequal variances 1.828 57.673 0.028 1.616 0.947 -2.326 -1.722

Descriptive statistics of pre-test scores

Project Group Number Mean value Standard deviation Standard error mean
Musical knowledge Experimental group 30 18.41 4.037 0.630
Control group 30 18.23 3.615 0.565
Spectrum recognition ability Experimental group 30 19.03 5.258 0.821
Control group 30 18.92 5.049 0.789
Basic piano skills Experimental group 30 15.69 2.654 0.414
Control group 30 16.12 2.733 0.427
Performance techniques Experimental group 30 17.38 3.125 0.488
Control group 30 16.85 3.346 0.523

Student basic information statistics

Primary dimension Secondary dimension Frequency Proportion
Gender Male 112 34.78%
Female 210 65.22%
Majors Piano performance 76 23.60%
Musical education 84 26.09%
Piano accompaniment 72 22.36%
Musicology 90 27.95%
Grade Freshman 112 34.78%
Sophomore 90 27.95%
Junior year 78 24.22%
Senior four 42 13.05%
Attitude towards the course Highly valued 176 54.66%
No taken seriously 20 6.21%
Generally valued 126 39.13%

T test results of paired samples in the control group

Project Control group(M±SD) t P
Before the experiment After the experiment
Musical knowledge 18.23±3.615 23.36±3.417 -2.145 0.035
Spectrum recognition ability 18.92±5.049 22.15±4.058 -2.014 0.042
Basic piano skills 16.12±2.733 19.41±3.874 -1.926 0.052
Performance techniques 16.85±3.346 18.53±4.562 -1.899 0.071

Acceptance of different professional students

Application mode Majors Demand attribute SI DSI
M O A I
Virtual piano classroom Piano performance 25 29 16 6 0.59 -0.71
Musical education 23 36 21 4 0.68 -0.71
Piano accompaniment 24 25 17 6 0.58 -0.68
Musicology 25 41 19 5 0.67 -0.73
Digital sheet music & automatic accompaniment Piano performance 18 21 33 4 0.71 -0.51
Musical education 29 38 12 5 0.60 -0.80
Piano accompaniment 14 34 22 2 0.78 -0.67
Musicology 25 44 17 4 0.68 -0.77
Interactive teaching software Piano performance 15 39 19 3 0.76 -0.71
Musical education 18 42 19 5 0.73 -0.71
Piano accompaniment 16 20 32 4 0.72 -0.50
Musicology 14 27 40 9 0.74 -0.46
VR & AR Piano performance 12 38 20 6 0.76 -0.66
Musical education 9 32 41 2 0.87 -0.49
Piano accompaniment 11 22 34 5 0.78 -0.46
Musicology 14 23 45 8 0.76 -0.41

Independent sample T test results before the experiment

Project Levin variance equivalence test Average equivalent T test
Assumption F Sig. t df Sig.(2-tailed) Mean difference Std. error difference 95% CI
Lower limit Upper limit
Musical knowledge Equal variances 0.157 0.726 0.564 58 0.712 0.674 1.526 -3.327 2.145
Unequal variances 0.564 57.865 0.712 0.674 1.526 -3.327 2.145
Spectrum recognition ability Equal variances 0.255 0.994 0.492 58 0.935 0.569 1.358 -3.641 2.412
Unequal variances 0.492 57.907 0.935 0.569 1.358 -3.641 2.412
Basic piano skills Equal variances 1.556 0.212 -0.767 58 0.159 -1.164 1.505 -1.862 3.826
Unequal variances -0.767 57.643 0.159 -1.164 1.505 -1.862 3.826
Performance techniques Equal variances 0.004 0.945 1.673 58 0.163 1.525 0.758 -0.019 2.832
Unequal variances 1.673 57.794 0.163 1.525 0.758 -0.019 2.832

T test results of paired samples in the experimental group

Project Experimental group(M±SD) t P
Before the experiment After the experiment
Musical knowledge 18.41±4.037 27.23±2.598 -2.953 0.000
Spectrum recognition ability 19.03±5.258 26.25±3.124 -2.431 0.004
Basic piano skills 15.69±2.654 22.34±4.986 -2.354 0.011
Performance techniques 17.38±3.125 23.16±5.312 -2.069 0.024

Acceptance of students of different grades

Application mode Grade Demand attribute SI DSI
M O A I
Virtual piano classroom Freshman 12 50 34 16 0.75 -0.55
Sophomore 16 34 28 12 0.69 -0.56
Junior year 10 26 13 18 0.58 -0.54
Senior four 4 16 10 10 0.65 -0.50
Digital sheet music & automatic accompaniment Freshman 24 65 20 3 0.76 -0.79
Sophomore 18 51 17 4 0.76 -0.77
Junior year 12 28 31 7 0.76 -0.51
Senior four 9 12 15 6 0.64 -0.50
Interactive teaching software Freshman 21 54 27 10 0.72 -0.67
Sophomore 19 42 25 4 0.74 -0.68
Junior year 12 24 36 6 0.77 -0.46
Senior four 11 25 4 2 0.69 -0.86
VR & AR Freshman 6 32 65 7 0.88 -0.35
Sophomore 12 25 48 5 0.81 -0.41
Junior year 8 26 35 9 0.78 -0.44
Senior four 5 16 18 3 0.81 -0.50
Language:
English