Research on predictive control of students’ performance in PE classes based on the mathematical model of multiple linear regression equation

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

List of dummy variable settings for college sports performance grades_

Category K		1	2	3	. . .	k
Virtual variable	D1	0	1	1	1	1
	D2	1	0	1	1	1
	D3	1	1	0	1	1
	. . .	. . .	. . .	. . .	. . .	. . .
	D (k−1)	1	1	1	0	1

List of the classification results of the merits of each school (region) and college sports performance_

Classmate code	Performance prediction
	Actual	Prediction	Strength ranking
A	98.55	98	1
B	98	98	1
C	98	98	1
D	98	98	1
E	97.25	97	2
F	97.11	97	2
G	97.1	97	2
H	96.12	96	3
I	92.12	92	4
J	92	92	4
K	90	90	5
L	90	90	5
M	89.11	89	6
N	89.12	89	6
O	87.12	87	7
P	86	86	8

Summary of the regression results of the share of outstanding and excellent results in college sports from 2014 to 2018

	Regression results of performance share		Regression results of outstanding performance share
	Coefficient	t	Coefficient	t
log (POP)	0.700580484	4.046	0.415217178	3.612307
log (PGDP)	0.00492357	3.8	0.507549691	1.092639
Home	0.720660842	1.656	0.950142728	3.393209
Mt-1	0.935333311	0.9	0.733616507	4.407553
β0	0.819858339	0.645	0.949132464	2.307292
D1	0.233461872	1.489	0.861656496	0.10588
D2	0.522969528	4.718	0.159542912	1.948906
D3	0.887297088	3.593	0.108918231	3.609763
D4	0.673300591	4.348	0.916780756	1.823459
D5	0.681120134	1.667	0.871739745	1.593532
D6	0.767696616	2.757	0.6677149	1.354243
Statistical test	R2 = 0.9544	F = 491.43223	R2 = 0.9254	F = 444.43223

Summary of the results of the two models’ prediction statistical indicators_

	Model	RMSE	MAPE	MAE	PEA
Grades	FCM	7.123	0.5446	4.789	0.954
	GA	6.785	0.5214	3.256	0.957
Excellent results	FCM	3.456	0.4851	2.0657	0.925
	GA	3.278	0.4712	2.2145	0.952