Exploration of Digital Media Art Design Practice Teaching Mode Based on Cultivation of Creative Ability

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

The students’ creative tendency and the difference of thought were tested

Class	N	Mean	SD	T	P
Examination of the difference of students’ creativity tendency
6	50	114.28	13.38	0.195	0.859
9	50	114.39	13.34
Examination of the difference of students’ innovative thinking ability
6	50	58.22	8.22	0.038	0.995
9	50	58.75	7.59

The students’ creativity tends to be tested in different dimensions

Class	Creativity tends	Dimension	N	M	SD	T	P
Laboratory class	Posttest-pretest	Challenge	50	0.21	0.95	1.815	0.079
		Image	50	0.24	0.70	2.845	0.022
		Curiosity	50	0.28	0.75	3.096	0.015
		Risk	50	0.20	0.60	2.146	0.040
Cross-reference class	Posttest-pretest	Challenge	50	0.03	0.30	0.512	0.685
		Image	50	0.03	0.28	0.577	0.584
		Curiosity	50	0.03	0.26	0.872	0.312
		Risk	50	0.03	0.32	0.443	0.714

Test of differences in students’innovative thinking abilities

Test	Class	N	M	SD	T	P
Pretest	Laboratory class	50	57.23	7.53	0.038	0.983
	Cross-reference class	50	57.31	8.22
Posttest	Laboratory class	50	60.14	5.71	2.134	0.035
	Cross-reference class	50	57.25	8.23

Analysis of student preferences and results

	Cross-reference class	Laboratory class
The students’ evaluation of the classroom teaching atmosphere of new and old teaching modes
The atmosphere is active up	60%	80.9%
The atmosphere is depressing	30.8%	14.4%
Negative confrontation	9.2%	4.7%
Self-assessment
Very interest	29.9%	40.6%
Interest	39.4%	52.9%
Disinterest	30.7%	6.5%
Harvesting self-evaluation
Harvest	34.5%	45.2%
Reap	49%	51.4%
No gain	16.5%	3.4%
Innovation ability development self-evaluation
Big raise	29.7%	38.5%
Have raise	43.3%	55.2%
Unimproved	27%	6.3%
Overall evaluation of teaching mode
Good	36.4%	57.3%
General	36.7%	30.5%
Difference	26.9%	12.2%

Analysis of the status quo of innovation ability

Innovative thinking ability		Innovative practices
Question	Proportion	Question	Proportion
Occasionally make a different point of view or a way to do it	50.2%	Sometimes, occasionally, find problems in the course of learning	81.4%
Students are not familiar with common innovative thinking methods	68.3%	The students study the problem, reflect the lack of active thinking in students’ learning	15.8%
Unable to use innovative thinking method to solve learning	89.6%	Sometimes students can solve it occasionally	74.5%
Occasionally or without doubt of its scientific nature	80.2%	Students are able to do good work or better	53.4%

Students’ tendency to be creative and innovative thinking ability

Class	Creative tendency	Innovative thinking ability
1	118.29	62.53
2	118.45	61.32
3	115.38	60.31
4	113.22	54.28
5	113.56	57.74
6	114.28	58.22
7	113.25	54.84
8	115.22	56.37
9	114.39	58.75
10	112.17	54.28

Students’ creativity tends to be tested in different dimensions

Test	Dimension	Class	N	M	SD	T	P
Pretest	Challenge	Cross-reference class	50	27.35	3.22	0.842	0.423
		Laboratory class	50	27.28	3.20
	Image	Cross-reference class	50	28.21	4.13	0.884	0.368
		Laboratory class	50	28.25	4.15
	Curiosity	Cross-reference class	50	33.92	4.83	0.704	0.428
		Laboratory class	50	33.84	4.55
	Risk	Cross-reference class	50	24.93	3.29	0.072	0.952
		Laboratory class	50	24.87	3.58
Posttest	Challenge	Cross-reference class	50	27.36	3.15	1.349	0.204
		Laboratory class	50	27.68	2.85
	Image	Cross-reference class	50	28.22	4.78	2.164	0.045
		Laboratory class	50	30.54	3.06
	Curiosity	Cross-reference class	50	33.95	4.72	2.315	0.033
		Laboratory class	50	35.84	3.84
	Risk	Cross-reference class	50	25.07	3.21	0.367	0.716
		Laboratory class	50	25.31	3.36