Study on Farmers’ Employment Transformation and the Realization of Common Wealth under Digital Rural Construction
19 mar 2025
O artykule
Data publikacji: 19 mar 2025
Otrzymano: 21 paź 2024
Przyjęty: 30 sty 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0493
Słowa kluczowe
© 2025 Jingyu Chen, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Farmers’ common rich evaluation index system
| Primary index | Secondary index | Tertiary index | Attribute |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers share the same wealth | Income distribution fairness | Income level | Forward |
| Income distribution | Forward | ||
| Output efficiency | Forward | ||
| Public service equalization | Social security | Forward | |
| Medical health | Forward | ||
| Spiritual affluence | Forward | ||
| Culture education | Forward |
Overall model suitability test
| Fit index | Reference standard | Numerical value | Model suitability judgment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction | Acceptability | Inadequacy | ||||
| Absolute fitting | Calorie ratio | <3 | 3~5 | >5 | 1.922 | Yes |
| RMSEA | <0.05 | 0.05~0.08 | >0.1 | 0.053 | Yes | |
| GFI | >0.90 | 0.80~0.90 | <0.85 | 0.997 | Yes | |
| Relative fitting | CFI | >0.90 | 0.80~0.90 | <0.80 | 0.996 | Yes |
| IFI | >0.90 | 0.80~0.90 | <0.80 | 0.998 | Yes | |
| NFI | >0.90 | 0.80~0.90 | <0.80 | 0.996 | Yes | |
Heterogeneity test results
| Variable | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| East | Midwest | 10% | 25% | 50% | 75% | 90% | |
| DV | 0.0722** | 0.2541* | 0.2049*** | 0.1863*** | 0.1524*** | 0.1136*** | 0.0874*** |
| Control variable | Control | Control | Control | Control | Control | Control | Control |
| Year | Control | Control | Control | Control | Control | Control | Control |
| Province | Control | Control | Control | Control | Control | Control | Control |
| N | 86 | 184 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 |
The intermediary effect of farmer’s employment transformation
| Variable | (1) | (2) | (3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct effect | Indirect effect | Total effect | |
| DV | 0.3019*** | 0.0452** | 0.3428*** |
| RET | 0.1152** | - | 0.1158** |
| Sobel-p | [0.0266] | ||
| Delta-p | [0.0435] | ||
| Monte Carlo-p | [0.0579] | ||
| Sample size | 300 | ||
| Mediation effect | 19% | ||
Digital rural construction evaluation index system
| Primary index | Secondary index | Tertiary index | Attribute |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digital village construction | Rural network infrastructure | Rural Internet penetration | Forward |
| Rural mobile number | Forward | ||
| Rural delivery route length | Forward | ||
| Rural digital economic development | Digital financial coverage span | Forward | |
| Digital financial usage depth | Forward | ||
| The degree of digitisation of puhui finance | Forward | ||
| Rural digital application scene | Quantity of farm machinery | Forward | |
| Rural electricity consumption | Forward | ||
| E-commerce development | Forward |
The influence of digital rural construction on rural common prosperity
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DV | 0.4132*** | 0.1099*** | 0.1569*** | 0.0984*** | 0.1163*** | 0.1172*** |
| CGE | - | - | 0.0081*** | 0.0051*** | 0.0058** | 0.0055*** |
| RET | - | - | - | 0.0044*** | 0.0013*** | 0.0013*** |
| RMP | - | - | - | - | 0.0176** | 0.0159** |
| FDI | -0.0012** | |||||
| Constant | 0.2314 | 0.2655*** | 0.2341*** | 0.1874*** | 0.1289*** | 0.1347*** |
| Year | - | Control | Control | Control | Control | Control |
| Province | - | Control | Control | Control | Control | Control |
| N | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 |
| adj.R2 | 0.1239 | 0.3159 | 0.4158 | 0.5596 | 0.5741 | 0.5963 |
