Effective Integration of Cultivation of Innovative and Entrepreneurial Ability of College Students and Civic and Political Education Resources in the Internet+ Era
Data publikacji: 19 mar 2025
Otrzymano: 21 paź 2024
Przyjęty: 12 lut 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0383
Słowa kluczowe
© 2025 Xiaoli Feng, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Under the background of China’s rapid social and economic development, it is important to take innovation and development as one of the most important internal driving forces for social development. In recent years, China’s higher education has been expanding year by year, and while the overall quality of the population has been improved, it has also brought about an increase in the number of graduates year by year, so the employment pressure is still a major livelihood problem that China is currently facing [1–3]. In the context of the era of mass entrepreneurship, it is necessary to improve the relevant mechanisms to comprehensively guarantee the employment and entrepreneurship work of college students. Innovation and entrepreneurship colleges are springing up in Chinese colleges and universities, and through innovation and entrepreneurship colleges, specializing in innovation and entrepreneurship education, we can cultivate talents with stronger professionalism, higher quality and better comprehensive ability [4–6].
The fundamental task of higher education curriculum ideology is to establish morality and nurture people, while innovation and entrepreneurship education is to cultivate innovative and complex talents for national construction [7–8]. Under the perspective of “Internet +”, promoting the integration and practice of curriculum civic politics and innovation and entrepreneurship education in colleges and universities is an important embodiment of practicing socialist core values and an urgent need to promote the deep integration of the two in terms of ideology, content and practice [9–12]. At present, in the “Internet +” perspective, the integration of college curriculum civics and innovation and entrepreneurship education is still facing some problems, such as the lack of ideological cognition in place, the lack of “Internet +” thinking of the faculty and the protection mechanism, etc., which not only adversely affects the deep integration of college curriculum civics and innovation and entrepreneurship education, but also creates a negative impact on the development and development of the education system. This not only adversely affects the deep integration of innovation and entrepreneurship education in universities, but also hinders the future construction and development of universities to a certain extent [13–15]. Therefore, colleges and universities should actively promote the in-depth integration of curriculum ideology and politics and innovation and entrepreneurship education, and give full play to their synergistic effect, so as to deliver “dual-creation” talents with high ideological and political awareness for China’s modernization and development [16–17].
If colleges and universities want to realize the cultivation goal of high-quality innovative talents, they must pay attention to the integration of curriculum ideology and innovation and entrepreneurship education, so as to enhance students’ innovative spirit, entrepreneurial awareness and innovation and entrepreneurial ability. Literature [18] emphasizes that innovation and entrepreneurship education is a new way to cultivate innovative talents and stimulate students’ entrepreneurial spirit in the new era, and puts forward reasonable improvement suggestions on the basis of analyzing the insufficiency of the current innovation and entrepreneurship education curriculum system in higher vocational colleges and universities. Literature [19] uses online and offline teaching methods to innovate the teaching content and teaching methods of the classroom, which is conducive to cultivating students’ professional theoretical practical ability and comprehensive quality level by integrating the Civics and Political Science knowledge of different majors and applying it in professional practice activities. Literature [20] shows that the traditional curriculum in higher vocational colleges and universities can’t meet the cultivation goal of comprehensive quality talents, so it builds a higher vocational professional curriculum system that integrates the curriculum of Civic and Political Education and Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education, which plays an important role in the construction of professional curriculum and the improvement of teaching quality in higher vocational colleges and universities. Literature [21] analyzed the problems existing in the development process of innovation and entrepreneurship courses in higher vocational colleges and universities, and put forward targeted improvement opinions for the development of innovation and entrepreneurship courses from the perspective of curriculum ideology, aiming to cultivate professionals with innovative ability and practical skills. Literature [22] calls on colleges and universities to take the responsibility of cultivating talents for the country in the severe employment situation, and to lead the development direction of innovation and entrepreneurship education by integrating ideological and political education, so that students can develop good professional ethics and innovation and entrepreneurship spirit while learning employment skills. Literature [23] discusses the significance of the integration of ideological and political education in colleges and universities and the practical education of “dual creation”, the ideological and political education of college students helps college students to establish the world view, outlook on life and values, and its integration with innovation and entrepreneurship education is beneficial to the cultivation of all-around high-quality talents with strong ideals and beliefs in line with the development of society. Literature [24] points out that the in-depth integration of ideological and political education and innovation and entrepreneurship education is a necessary measure for the progress of education concept and education reform, which reflects the heterogeneity of theoretical learning and practical operation, and can realize the goal of cultivating high-quality talents.
The study analyzed the value of effective integration of innovation and entrepreneurship ability and civic education, and also extracted relevant influencing factors according to the effective integration pathway: own energy investment, theoretical guidance, faculty strength, policy support, curriculum resources, and self-efficacy. Fourth-year students of a university in Henan Province were selected as a sample to distribute questionnaires to collect data, and the quantitative relationship between the influencing factors and the resources of Civic and Political Education was examined by using the correlation analysis method, the multiple regression model, and the structural equation. Through the empirical research method, it is understood that ideological and political education in colleges and universities can improve the ideological understanding, practice platform and so on, so as to improve their innovative and entrepreneurial ability.
Firstly, Civic and political education can guide college students to establish correct concepts of innovation and entrepreneurship. Based on Civic and political education, college students can realize that innovation and entrepreneurship is an important way to promote social progress and personal development rather than a risk and burden; secondly, Civic and political education can effectively stimulate college students’ interest and enthusiasm in innovation and entrepreneurship. Secondly, Civic and political education can effectively stimulate college students’ interest and enthusiasm in innovation and entrepreneurship. Through civic and political education, college students can come into contact with various cases of innovation and entrepreneurship, as well as successful experiences, which can stimulate their interest and enthusiasm in innovation and entrepreneurship. By utilizing Civic and Political Education, college students can establish a correct outlook on life and values, so as to cultivate a positive sense of innovation and entrepreneurship, and take the initiative to devote themselves to the practice of innovation and entrepreneurship.
Civic and political education can help college students establish correct values of innovation and entrepreneurship. With the help of Civic and Political Education, college students can deeply understand the meaning and significance of innovation and entrepreneurship, and realize that innovation and entrepreneurship is an important force to promote social progress and economic development, so as to set up correct concepts of innovation and entrepreneurship; secondly, Civic and Political Education can make college students clear about the social value and responsibility of innovation and entrepreneurship. Under the guidance of Civic and Political Education, college students can realize that innovation and entrepreneurship are not only for personal interests, but also for the development and progress of society. They will take social responsibility in the process of innovation and entrepreneurship, clarify their mission and goals, and strive to create more value for the society; finally, Civic and political education can also cultivate entrepreneurs with a sense of social responsibility and the spirit of innovation.
Civic and political education will bring necessary knowledge and theoretical support, through learning the basic principles and ideological methods of Marxism, college students can deeply understand the law of social development and the importance of innovation and entrepreneurship, so as to form the correct concept of innovation and entrepreneurship. First of all, Civic and political education can help college students master the basic knowledge and skills needed for innovation and entrepreneurship. In the Civic and Political Education Program, students can learn the relevant theories and practical experiences of innovation and entrepreneurship, understand the basic process and methods of innovation and entrepreneurship, and master the practical skills such as market research, business plan writing and team management, so as to lay a solid foundation for future innovation and entrepreneurship practice; second, Civic and Political Education can cultivate college students’ innovative thinking.
The main resources of education mainly include the resources of teachers, students, and parents. The reasonable integration and utilization of resources can maximize the utility of limited manpower.
The first step is to integrate teacher subject resources. Among these three types of subject resources, teacher subject resources, i.e., the teaching force, is the fundamental element of educational development, which directly affects the implementation effect of educational activities.
Secondly, the role of student subject resources cannot be ignored. Successful educational activities not only educate students about the subject matter, but also encourage self-education and mutual education between educators. This is the main body of educational activities.
Once again, parents’ subject resources should also be incorporated into innovation, entrepreneurship, and civic education. Parents’ subject resources are the most widely sourced, most numerous, and most socialized type of subject resources in college education. However, they are easily neglected.
First, the direct integration of civic and political education with innovation and entrepreneurship education. Civic and political education time consists of two parts: theoretical teaching time and practical teaching time, which can be used to organize students to go deep into the countryside and enterprises, conduct extensive social investigation and market research, and let students directly immerse themselves in the real innovation and entrepreneurship environments of the countryside and enterprises, so as to stimulate their innovation and entrepreneurship inspiration and enthusiasm.
Secondly, teachers engaged in innovation and entrepreneurship education and Civic and Political Education constantly improve their business level and educational ability, constantly update teaching content, innovative teaching methods, improve teaching methods, fully grasp and make good use of every forty-five minutes, and strive to maximize the efficiency of classroom time.
Curriculum resources are the necessary and direct conditions for the implementation of education, and play a central role in the movement of education. Whether the curriculum is reasonable or not and the utilization of curriculum resources are related to the realization of educational goals and the actual impact of education. Innovation and entrepreneurship education and civic education should not only actively develop new curriculum resources on and off campus, but also effectively integrate and utilize existing curriculum resources in a reasonable manner [25].
First, we should fully explore the innovation and entrepreneurship education resources offered by the Civic and Political Education Program. Take undergraduate colleges and universities as an example, according to the requirements of the program of the Ministry of Education, undergraduate colleges and universities need to offer five courses of Civic and Political Education, including Introduction to Ideological and Moral Cultivation and Legal Foundations, Outline of Modern Chinese History, Introduction to the Fundamental Principles of Marxism, Introduction to Mao Zedong Thought and the Theoretical System of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, and Situation and Policies.
Secondly, the resources for ideological education in innovation and entrepreneurship education courses should be developed in depth. Innovation and entrepreneurship education courses include innovation and entrepreneurship general courses, as well as enterprise management courses and related humanities and social science courses, through which the quality of innovation and entrepreneurship awareness of college students is cultivated, the level of innovation and entrepreneurship skills of college students is strengthened, and the comprehensive quality of college students is continuously improved.
In this paper, we take the innovation and entrepreneurship ability of college students as the dependent variable, and the six influencing factors of their own energy investment, theoretical guidance, faculty strength, policy support, curriculum resources, and self-efficacy as the control variables, and explore their effects on the dependent variable.
The Scale of Integration of Bicentennial Ability and Civic and Political Resources, which includes six dimensions: depth of ideological understanding, depth of cooperation level, depth of policy guarantee, breadth of curriculum system, breadth of practice platform, and breadth of team building. The final alpha coefficient value is 0.896, which is more than 0.8, and the overall reliability of the scale is relatively high.The value of Bartlett’s sphericity is 0.000, which is lower than 0.05, which means that the significant correlation between the variables is more obvious. Also, the value of KMO is 0.815, which means that this set of data information is suitable for factorial research.
The scale of influencing factors for integrating Bicentennial Ability and Civic and Political Resources includes six dimensions: own energy investment, theoretical guidance, faculty strength, policy support, curriculum resources, and self-efficacy. The alpha coefficient of each dimension is higher than 0.8, and the final alpha coefficient value is 0.922, which is more than 0.8, and the overall reliability of the scale is also relatively high, and the value of Bartlett’s sphericity is 0.000, and the value of KMO is 0.858, which indicates that the information of this set of data is suitable for the factorial study, and the validity of the questionnaire is good.
After determining the measurement items, the questionnaire was formed according to a five-point Likert scale, which indicates different levels of recognition.
This paper adopts the method of questionnaire collection for data collection, this questionnaire is designed to collect mainly for the cultivation of entrepreneurial ability of college students and the integration of Civic and Political Education as the key factors. A total of 245 students in the fourth year of a university in Henan Province were selected, 245 questionnaires were distributed, and 230 valid questionnaires were obtained by eliminating invalid questionnaires, and the validity rate of the questionnaires was 93.9%.
In the field of natural sciences, the Pearson correlation coefficient is widely used to measure the degree of correlation between two variables, with a wide range of applicability and high reliability, especially in analyzing complex data with the combined influence of multiple factors [26]. In Pearson correlation analysis, for two variables
Where:
The value of
Representation of the regression model:
Based on the observed value sample data is recorded as (
Expand and get:
In this equation,
From this, it can be seen that:
Similarly, the multivariate linear overall regression equation is
The multiple linear sample regression equation is:
The model can be expressed in matrix form:
Structural equation modeling, also known as latent variable modeling or covariance structural modeling, is a statistical method that integrates factor analysis and path analysis. It is applicable to the situation when the study of indicators that are difficult to observe directly can be portrayed jointly by multiple observable indicators, in which the indicators that are difficult to observe directly are called latent variables, and if a latent variable is able to affect other latent variables without being affected by other variables, it is called exogenous latent variable, and on the contrary, if a latent variable is affected by an exogenous latent variable, it is called endogenous latent variable [27]. In this case, the measurement equation consists of latent variables and measurable variables, and the structural equation consists of exogenous latent variables over endogenous latent variables.
The expression of the measurement equation is shown below:
The expressions for the structural equations are shown below:
Structural equation modeling generally needs to satisfy the following assumptions: the error
Self-energy investment and college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability
The correlation between self-energy input and college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability is shown in Table 1, and there is a significant positive correlation between self-energy input and college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability, (Pearson coefficient is 0.224, P=0.000<0.01). At the same time, there is a positive correlation between own energy input and other related dimensions, and the correlation is significant. It indicates that own energy input in civic education can effectively promote the improvement of students’ innovation and entrepreneurship abilities.
Theoretical guidance and college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability
Use correlation to analyze whether theory guidance and college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability are related. The results of the analysis are shown in Table 2, there is a positive correlation between theoretical guidance and college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability, and the correlation is significant (Pearson coefficient is 0.125, P=0.000<0.01). Meanwhile, there is no correlation between theoretical guidance and policy guarantee and team building, in which policy guarantee P=0.122>0.05 and team building P=0.553>0.05. Besides that, there is a significant positive correlation between theoretical guidance and innovation and entrepreneurship ability of other dimensions, which indicates that innovation and entrepreneurship ability of college students is affected by theoretical dimension.
Faculty strength and college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability
Using correlation to analyze whether faculty strength is related to college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability, the results are shown in Table 3, there is a positive correlation between faculty strength and college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability and the correlation is significant (Pearson coefficient is 0.179, P=0.000<0.01). Meanwhile, faculty strength has a positive relationship with all other dimensions and the correlation is significant. The results all reflect the importance and necessity of faculty strength in improving and cultivating the innovation and entrepreneurship abilities of college students.
Policy support and college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability
The correlation between policy support and college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability is shown in Table 4, which shows that there is a positive correlation between policy support and college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability, and the correlation is significant (Pearson coefficient is 0.201, P=0.000<0.01). Meanwhile, there is a positive correlation between policy support and all dimensions, and the correlation is significant. It indicates that the government’s policy support has a positive promotion effect on the improvement of college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship abilities.
Curriculum resources and college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability
Using correlation to analyze whether curriculum resources and college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability are related, the correlation results are shown in Table 5, there is a positive correlation between curriculum resources and college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability and the correlation is significant (Pearson coefficient is 0.134, P=0.000<0.01). There is also a positive and significant correlation with all other dimensions. The results affirm the influence of curriculum resources on the innovation and entrepreneurship competence of university students, and both results validate each other.
Self-efficacy and college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability
Using correlation to analyze whether self-efficacy and college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability are related, the results are shown in Table 6. There is a positive correlation between self-efficacy and college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability, and the correlation is significant (Pearson coefficient is 0.125, P=0.000<0.01). Meanwhile, self-efficacy is not correlated with cooperation level and practice platform, including policy support P=0.093>0.05 and practice platform P=0.132>0.05. Other than that, self-efficacy has a significant positive correlation with other dimensions.
The correlation between and Self-energy input and entrepreneurship ability
| Dependent variable | Independent variable | Pearson correlation coefficient | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Self-engagement | Innovative entrepreneurial ability | 0.224** | 0.000 |
| Thought knowledge | 0.188** | 0.000 | |
| Cooperative level | 0.179** | 0.000 | |
| Policy security | 0.153** | 0.000 | |
| curriculum | 0.156** | 0.000 | |
| Practical platform | 0.149** | 0.000 | |
| Team construction | 0.142** | 0.000 |
Note: denotes significant correlation at 0.01 level
* denotes significant correlation at 0.05 level
Theoretical guidance and innovation and entrepreneurship ability
| Dependent variable | Independent variable | Pearson correlation coefficient | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical guidance | Innovative entrepreneurial ability | 0.125** | 0.000 |
| Thought knowledge | 0.067* | 0.032 | |
| Cooperative level | 0.068* | 0.025 | |
| Policy security | 0.054 | 0.122 | |
| Team construction | 0.022 | 0.553 | |
| Practical platform | 0.096** | 0.002 | |
| Curriculum | 0.088** | 0.001 |
Note: denotes significant correlation at 0.01 level
denotes significant correlation at 0.05 level
The ability of teachers and innovative entrepreneurship
| Dependent variable | Independent variable | Pearson correlation coefficient | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty | Innovative entrepreneurial ability | 0.179** | 0.000 |
| Thought knowledge | 0.159** | 0.000 | |
| Cooperative level | 0.134** | 0.000 | |
| Policy security | 0.143** | 0.000 | |
| curriculum | 0.136** | 0.000 | |
| Practical platform | 0.119** | 0.000 | |
| Team construction | 0.112** | 0.000 |
Note: denotes significant correlation at 0.01 level
* denotes significant correlation at 0.05 level
Policy support and innovation entrepreneurship ability
| Dependent variable | Independent variable | Pearson correlation coefficient | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy support | Innovative entrepreneurial ability | 0.201** | 0.000 |
| Thought knowledge | 0.175** | 0.000 | |
| Cooperative level | 0.143** | 0.000 | |
| Policy security | 0.163** | 0.000 | |
| curriculum | 0.147** | 0.000 | |
| Practical platform | 0.134** | 0.000 | |
| Team construction | 0.121** | 0.000 |
Note: denotes significant correlation at 0.01 level
* denotes significant correlation at 0.05 level
Relevant information on course resources and innovative entrepreneurial ability
| Dependent variable | Independent variable | Pearson correlation coefficient | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course resources | Innovative entrepreneurial ability | 0.134** | 0.000 |
| Thought knowledge | 0.101** | 0.001 | |
| Cooperative level | 0.088* | 0.004 | |
| Policy security | 0.082* | 0.009 | |
| curriculum | 0.085** | 0.006 | |
| Practical platform | 0.082* | 0.009 | |
| Team construction | 0.075* | 0.004 |
Note: denotes significant correlation at 0.01 level
denotes significant correlation at 0.05 level
Self-efficacy and innovative entrepreneurial ability
| Dependent variable | Independent variable | Pearson correlation coefficient | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|
| self-efficacy | Innovative entrepreneurial ability | 0.125** | 0.000 |
| Thought knowledge | 0.081* | 0.009 | |
| Cooperative level | 0.072* | 0.018 | |
| Policy security | 0.051 | 0.093 | |
| Practical platform | 0.048 | 0.132 | |
| Curriculum | 0.105** | 0.001 | |
| Team construction | 0.022 | 0.000 |
Note: denotes significant correlation at 0.01 level
denotes significant correlation at 0.05 level
The data situation related to the multiple linear regression model is shown in Table 7, in which the observed value of the F statistic is 34.245, corresponding to a probability p-value approximating 0, which is smaller than the significance level a=0.05, indicating that the model passes the setup test, and that there is a linear correlation between the explanatory variables and the explanatory variables.DW=2.088 is between 1.5 and 2.5, which indicates that there is no serial correlation, i.e. there is no autocorrelation among the variables.
Multivariate linear regression equation
| Model | Nonnormalized coefficient | Standard coefficient | t | Sig. | Common linear statistics | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Standard error | Trial version | Tolerance | VIF | |||
| (Constants) | 1.686 | 0.155 | 12.545 | 0.000 | |||
| Self-engagement | 0.045 | 0.009 | 0.178 | 4.521 | 0.000 | 0.574 | 1.208 |
| Theoretical guidance | 0.257 | 0.035 | 0.266 | 7.062 | 0.000 | 0.695 | 1.221 |
| Faculty | 0.188 | 0.027 | 0.087 | 4.673 | 0.000 | 0.854 | 1.113 |
| Policy support | 0.288 | 0.049 | 0.187 | 2.118 | 0.004 | 0.725 | 1.322 |
| Course resources | 0.355 | 0.054 | 0.111 | 2.582 | 0.002 | 0.696 | 1.358 |
| self-efficacy | 0.432 | 0.056 | 0.091 | 2.248 | 0.019 | 0.731 | 1.402 |
a. Dependent variable: innovation and entrepreneurship ability of college students
F=34.245***, P<0.001, R=0.557, R2=0.385, Adjusted R2=0.376, Std. Error of the Estimate is 0.74352, Durbin-Watson is 2.088.
In addition, the table shows the regression coefficients, t-values, and covariance statistics of the significance tests of the variables for the six variables mentioned above in relation to the innovation and entrepreneurial ability of university students. Among them, the probability p-values corresponding to the t-test are 0.000, 0.000, 0.000, 0.000, 0.004, 0.002, 0.019, which are less than or approximately equal to the significance level of a=0.05, indicating that the regression model not only passes the set-up test, but also passes the significance test of the variables. Since the variance inflation factor VIF of all independent variables is much less than 10 and the average variance inflation factor is 1.27>1, we believe that the regression equation does not have a serious problem of approximate multicollinearity.
We take the innovation and entrepreneurship ability of college students as Y (dependent variable) and the other six variables as Xi (independent variables), where
From this, we can derive the multiple linear regression equation:
The standardized regression equation is:
As can be seen from the standardized regression coefficients, the factor that has the greatest influence on college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability is self-efficacy, followed by curriculum resources, policy support, faculty strength, theoretical guidance, and their own energy input, but the degree of influence of each independent variable does not differ much, indicating that innovation and entrepreneurship ability is not determined by a certain factor, but is the result of a joint effect.
Based on the available database, it is assumed that the explanatory variables are correlated with the explanatory variables through the control variables, and the SEM structural equation is constructed to verify the model path fit. SEM equations were constructed to verify the path fit through the positive correlation between six observed variables and the innovation and entrepreneurship ability status of college students, and the SEM equations were based on the data obtained from 230 questionnaires. The self is set as the first level indicator (

SEM structure equation
According to the SEM modeling idea, whether the modeling is scientific and reasonable, need to verify the relationship between the model variables, compare the verification results with the reference standard, and re-correct the variable relationships and assumptions that do not meet the standard until the model parameters meet the parameter standards. Based on the above ideas, the initial test has been completed. The test results show that the individual indicators are not satisfactory and need to be revised. According to the recommendations for model correction and re-testing, the parameters should be corrected until they meet the requirements. The parameters after correction are shown in Table 8. The data shows that after correction, all indicators are in the acceptable range, and the model is well adapted.
Fitness test
| Statistical inspection quantity | X2/DF | GFI | AGFI | NFI | CFI | RMSEA | SRMR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fitness criteria | <4 | >0.09 | >0.09 | >0.09 | >0.09 | <0.08 | <0.08 |
| Test result | 2.352 | 0.893 | 0.960 | 0.930 | 0.930 | 0.035 | 0.015 |
The final corrected SEM path parameters were estimated using the path parameter estimation function of AMOS 17.0, and the calculated results are shown in Table 9.
Path parameter estimation
| Path → Influence | Estimate | C.R | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Self-engagement→Students’ ability to innovate | 0.574 | 2.056 | 0.017 |
| Theoretical guidance→Students’ ability to innovate | 0.612 | 2.135 | 0.014 |
| Faculty→Students’ ability to innovate | 0.605 | 2.095 | 0.015 |
| Policy support→Students’ ability to innovate | 0.639 | 2.235 | 0.027 |
| Course resources→Students’ ability to innovate | 0.752 | 2.004 | 0.025 |
| self-efficacy→Students’ ability to innovate | 0.797 | 2.118 | 0.032 |
From the table, it can be seen that, one, the values of statistic C.R (both greater than the standard value of 1.96) and the value of the probability of the least improbable event P (both less than the standard value of 0.05) meet the requirements of the SEM model. Secondly, comparing the Estimate values of the six apparent influence variables, it can be seen that the first one is self-efficacy (0.797), and then curriculum resources (0.752), policy support (0.639), theoretical guidance (0.612), faculty (0.605), and their own energy investment (0.574) have decreasing effects on the influence of innovation and entrepreneurship ability of college students. Thirdly, in the actual investigation and analysis, it is found that there is a matching problem between the values of individual indexes of the initial data and the ideal data of the structural equations, although these values are within the range of the effective model, it also means that there is a discrepancy between the actual situation of the apparent variables and the model value standard, which means that there is room for the improvement and upgrading of the real situation of some apparent variables. Finally, since these six explicit variables are the key factors of this study, their problems will inevitably constrain the overall effect of college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability, and therefore these variables must be further improved in practice to enhance the overall effect.
The study explores the integration path of college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship creation ability and ideological education, and carries out correlation analysis according to the influencing factors of the integration of the two, and empirically analyzes it by using multiple regression and structural equation modeling. The results show that six influencing factors, namely, own energy input, theoretical guidance, teacher strength, policy support, curriculum resources, and self-efficacy, have a significant correlation with college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability (p=0.000<0.01), and the second factor that has the greatest influence on college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability based on the results of multiple regression analysis is self-efficacy in the order of the most influential factors. Curriculum resources, policy support, teachers’ strength, theoretical guidance, and their own energy input. Finally, the SEM test confirms again that these six influencing factors have a decreasing effect on college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship ability in the above order.
