Research and Application of User Behavior Data Analysis Technology for E-commerce
, oraz
27 lut 2025
O artykule
Data publikacji: 27 lut 2025
Otrzymano: 25 wrz 2024
Przyjęty: 23 sty 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0116
Słowa kluczowe
© 2025 Xiaohan Yuan et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 8.
Figure 9.
Figure 10.
Comparison of effects of three models
| Model Name | Accuracy rate | Recall rate | F1 Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Logistic regression | 4.25% | 4.31% | 4.27% |
| LightGBM | 5.61% | 5.63% | 5.62% |
| LightGBM + LR | 5.81% | 602.70% | 5.93% |
Evaluation indicators of each algorithm
| Precision | Coverage | MAE | Diversity | Surprise | Unexpectedness | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16.68% | 8.34% | 89.11% | 0.365 | 10.956 | 8.841 | |
| 23.94% | 99.20% | 78.68% | 0.914 | 8.130 | 1.633 | |
| 26.40% | 99.20% | 76.93% | 0.936 | 8.242 | 1.444 |
Overall prediction results
| Model Name | Accuracy rate | Recall rate | F1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Logistic regression | 4.66% | 4.72% | 4.68% |