The Value Following and Optimization Path of Teacher Evaluation Reform in Colleges and Universities in the New Era

[1] Hargreaves, L., & Flutter, J. (2019). The status of teachers. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bates, G., Fisher, R., Turner, K., Machirori, T. L., & Rixon, A. (2024). Raising the social status of teachers: teachers as social entrepreneurs. The Australian Educational Researcher, 51(4), 1405-1424. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Liao, H., & Hitchcock, J. (2018). Reported credibility techniques in higher education evaluation studies that use qualitative methods: A research synthesis. Evaluation and program planning, 68, 157-165. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Steinberg, M. P., & Kraft, M. A. (2017). The sensitivity of teacher performance ratings to the design of teacher evaluation systems. Educational Researcher, 46(7), 378-396. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Cao, L. (2024). Some Thoughts on Deepening the Reform of College Education Evaluation in the New Era under the Strategy of Education Power. The Journal of Education Insights, 2(1). Search in Google Scholar

[6] Gómez, L. F., & Valdés, M. G. (2019). The Evaluation of Teacher Performance in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Psychology-Propositos y Representaciones, 7(2), 499-515. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Flores, M. A., & Derrington, M. L. (2018). Improving teacher evaluation: key issues for appraisers in a globalised era. Teachers and Teaching, 24(3), 203-208. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Philip, R. M. (2020). Assessing the impact of the implementation of teacher performance appraisal development tool on the quality of teaching in Kenya. A case study of Narok County secondary schools. The Cradle of Knowledge: African Journal of Educational and Social Science Research, 7(1), 16-28. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kagema, J., & Irungu, C. (2018). An analysis of teacher performance appraisals and their influence on teacher performance in secondary schools in Kenya. International Journal of Education, 11(1), 93-98. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Kang, N. H. (2017). Teacher evaluation reform in South Korea. In International handbook of teacher quality and policy (pp. 542-556). Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Li, T., & Zhang, L. (2024). China’s Policy Actions to Lead Teacher Development With Evaluation Reform. ECNU Review of Education, 7(2), 453-462. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Weng, S. S., Liu, Y., & Chuang, Y. C. (2019). Reform of Chinese universities in the context of sustainable development: teacher evaluation and improvement based on hybrid multiple criteria decision-making model. Sustainability, 11(19), 5471. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Zhang, X. F., & Ng, H. M. (2017). An effective model of teacher appraisal: Evidence from secondary schools in Shanghai, China. Educational management administration & leadership, 45(2), 196-218. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Kraft, M. A., & Gilmour, A. F. (2017). Revisiting the widget effect: Teacher evaluation reforms and the distribution of teacher effectiveness. Educational researcher, 46(5), 234-249. Search in Google Scholar

[15] McCune, V. (2021). Academic identities in contemporary higher education: sustaining identities that value teaching. Teaching in Higher Education. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Amrein-Beardsley, A., & Holloway, J. (2019). Value-added models for teacher evaluation and accountability: Commonsense assumptions. Educational Policy, 33(3), 516-542. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Paufler, N. A. (2018). Declining morale, diminishing autonomy, and decreasing value: Principal reflections on a high-stakes teacher evaluation system. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 13(8), n8. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Briole, S., & Maurin, É. (2024). There’s Always Room for Improvement: The Persistent Benefits of a Large‐Scale Teacher Evaluation System. Journal of Human Resources, 59(4), 1150-1179. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Paufler, N. A., King, K. M., & Zhu, P. (2020). Promoting professional growth in new teacher evaluation systems: Practitioners’ lived experiences in changing policy contexts. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65, 100873. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Grissom, J. A., & Bartanen, B. (2019). Strategic retention: Principal effectiveness and teacher turnover in multiple-measure teacher evaluation systems. American Educational Research Journal, 56(2), 514-555. Search in Google Scholar

[21] He Pei, Guo Yangming, Wang Xiaodong, Zhang Shiqi & Zhong Zhihao. (2022). A Multi-Level Fuzzy Evaluation Method for the Reliability of Integrated Energy Systems. Applied Sciences(1),274-274. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Zhihao He, Manning Li, Zelin Cai, Rongsheng Zhao, Tingting Hong, Zhi Yang & Zhi Zhang. (2021). Optimal irrigation and fertilizer amounts based on multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of yield, growth and fruit quality on cherry tomato. Agricultural Water Management106360-. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Ozcan Ozyurt, Hakan Özköse & Ahmet Ayaz. (2024). Evaluating the latest trends of Industry 4.0 based on LDA topic model. The Journal of Supercomputing(13),19003-19030. Search in Google Scholar