Research on Urban-Rural Integration Planning Guidance and Path Realization in Suburban Areas of Metropolis Based on AI Models
, , , e
24 set 2025
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Pubblicato online: 24 set 2025
Ricevuto: 09 gen 2025
Accettato: 01 mag 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0981
Parole chiave
© 2025 Shiwei Hu et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Urban and rural integrated development level measure system
| Criterion layer | Secondary index | Index number |
|---|---|---|
| Urban and rural economic integration (A) | Household per capita consumption level | A1 |
| Urban and rural disposable income ratio | A2 | |
| Non-farm industry ratio | A3 | |
| Urban and rural GDP per capita | A4 | |
| Urbanization rate | A5 | |
| Thie index | A6 | |
| Urban and rural space integration (B) | Private car ownership of urban and rural residents | B1 |
| Urban space expansion | B2 | |
| Passenger turnover | B3 | |
| Construction area | B4 | |
| Telephone penetration | B5 | |
| Urban and rural social integration (C) | Urban basic health insurance fund expenditure ratio | C1 |
| Residents of urban and rural residents | C2 | |
| Urban and rural residents’ social pension fund | C3 | |
| Urban and rural clinics | C4 |
The urban and rural integration level analysis of 8 suburbs in N city
| Rural township number | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.056 | 0.247 | 0.29 | 0.359 | 0.361 | 0.536 | 0.623 | 0.826 |
| 2 | 0.006 | 0.104 | 0.236 | 0.307 | 0.379 | 0.497 | 0.597 | 0.694 |
| 3 | 0.092 | 0.235 | 0.284 | 0.324 | 0.331 | 0.574 | 0.613 | 0.690 |
| 4 | 0.067 | 0.294 | 0.335 | 0.342 | 0.442 | 0.567 | 0.59 | 0.612 |
| 5 | 0.094 | 0.27 | 0.277 | 0.3 | 0.304 | 0.317 | 0.414 | 0.452 |
| 6 | 0.182 | 0.184 | 0.23 | 0.262 | 0.304 | 0.369 | 0.516 | 0.545 |
| 7 | 0.092 | 0.183 | 0.334 | 0.48 | 0.512 | 0.647 | 0.71 | 0.723 |
| 8 | 0.044 | 0.19 | 0.219 | 0.305 | 0.383 | 0.441 | 0.506 | 0.654 |
The optimal projection direction and weight value of the evaluation index
| Criterion layer | Index weight | Secondary index | Index number | Optimum projection direction | Index weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urban and rural economic integration (A) | 0.461 | Household per capita consumption level | A1 | 0.156 | 0.098 |
| Urban and rural disposable income ratio | A2 | 0.053 | 0.065 | ||
| Non-farm industry ratio | A3 | 0.124 | 0.038 | ||
| Urban and rural GDP per capita | A4 | 0.061 | 0.08 | ||
| Urbanization rate | A5 | 0.05 | 0.066 | ||
| Thie index | A6 | 0.158 | 0.114 | ||
| Urban and rural space integration (B) | 0.325 | Private car ownership of urban and rural residents | B1 | 0.321 | 0.064 |
| Urban space expansion | B2 | 0.251 | 0.032 | ||
| Passenger turnover | B3 | 0.366 | 0.096 | ||
| Construction area | B4 | 0.212 | 0.07 | ||
| Telephone penetration | B5 | 0.175 | 0.063 | ||
| Urban and rural social integration (C) | 0.214 | Urban basic health insurance fund expenditure ratio | C1 | 0.22 | 0.02 |
| Residents of urban and rural residents | C2 | 0.087 | 0.058 | ||
| Urban and rural residents’ social pension fund | C3 | 0.277 | 0.064 | ||
| Urban and rural clinics | C4 | 0.192 | 0.072 |