Assessment and Enhancement of Teaching Effectiveness of Piano Majors in Colleges and Universities Based on AHP Modeling

[1] Cadez, S., Dimovski, V., & Zaman Groff, M. (2017). Research, teaching and performance evaluation in academia: the salience of quality. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1455-1473. CadezS.DimovskiV. & Zaman GroffM. (2017). Research, teaching and performance evaluation in academia: the salience of quality. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1455-1473.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Lyon, C. J., Nabors Oláh, L., & Caroline Wylie, E. (2019). Working toward integrated practice: Understanding the interaction among formative assessment strategies. Journal of Educational Research, 112(3). LyonC. J.Nabors OláhL. & Caroline WylieE. (2019). Working toward integrated practice: Understanding the interaction among formative assessment strategies. Journal of Educational Research, 112(3).Search in Google Scholar

[3] Lee, H., Chung, H. Q., Zhang, Y., Abedi, J., & Warschauer, M. (2020). The effectiveness and features of formative assessment in US K-12 education: A systematic review. Applied Measurement in Education, 33(2), 124-140. LeeH.ChungH. Q.ZhangY.AbediJ. & WarschauerM. (2020). The effectiveness and features of formative assessment in US K-12 education: A systematic review. Applied Measurement in Education, 33(2), 124-140.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Ozan, C., & Kıncal, R. Y. (2018). The Effects of Formative Assessment on Academic Achievement, Attitudes toward the Lesson and Self-Regulation Skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(1). OzanC. & KıncalR. Y. (2018). The Effects of Formative Assessment on Academic Achievement, Attitudes toward the Lesson and Self-Regulation Skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(1).Search in Google Scholar

[5] Liu, Y. H., & Yu, F. Y. (2019). Supporting Active Learning and Formative Evaluation via Teaching-by-Questioning in Classrooms: Design, Development, and Preliminary Evaluation of an Online Learning System. Interactive Learning Environments, 27, 841-855. LiuY. H. & YuF. Y. (2019). Supporting Active Learning and Formative Evaluation via Teaching-by-Questioning in Classrooms: Design, Development, and Preliminary Evaluation of an Online Learning System. Interactive Learning Environments, 27, 841-855.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Dayal, H. C. (2021). How teachers use formative assessment strategies during teaching: Evidence from the classroom. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 46(7), 1-21. DayalH. C. (2021). How teachers use formative assessment strategies during teaching: Evidence from the classroom. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 46(7), 1-21.Search in Google Scholar

[7] UZUN, L., & ERTOK, Ş. (2020). Student Opinions on Task-Based Approach as Formative Evaluation versus Exam-Based Approach as Summative Evaluation in Education. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 10(2). UZUNL. & ERTOKŞ. (2020). Student Opinions on Task-Based Approach as Formative Evaluation versus Exam-Based Approach as Summative Evaluation in Education. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 10(2).Search in Google Scholar

[8] Fougt, S. S., Siebert-Evenstone, A., Eagan, B., Tabatabai, S., & Misfeldt, M. (2018, March). Epistemic network analysis of students’ longer written assignments as formative/summative evaluation. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 126-130). FougtS. S.Siebert-EvenstoneA.EaganB.TabatabaiS. & MisfeldtM. (2018, March). Epistemic network analysis of students’ longer written assignments as formative/summative evaluation. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 126-130).Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kibble, J. D. (2017). Best practices in summative assessment. Advances in Physiology Education, 41(1), 110-119. KibbleJ. D. (2017). Best practices in summative assessment. Advances in Physiology Education, 41(1), 110-119.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Cheruvalath, R., Abdul Hameed, H., & Bakilapadavu, G. (2024). “Summative evaluation” as a teaching method: An opportunity to reduce confirmation bias. The Journal of Educational Research, 117(1), 1-11. CheruvalathR.Abdul HameedH. & BakilapadavuG. (2024). “Summative evaluation” as a teaching method: An opportunity to reduce confirmation bias. The Journal of Educational Research, 117(1), 1-11.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Hyland, K. M., Dhaliwal, G., Goldberg, A. N., Chen, L. M., Land, K., & Wamsley, M. (2018). Peer review of teaching: Insights from a 10-year experience. Medical Science Educator, 28, 675-681. HylandK. M.DhaliwalG.GoldbergA. N.ChenL. M.LandK. & WamsleyM. (2018). Peer review of teaching: Insights from a 10-year experience. Medical Science Educator, 28, 675-681.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Seifert, T., & Feliks, O. (2019). Online self-assessment and peer-assessment as a tool to enhance student-teachers’ assessment skills. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(2), 169-185. SeifertT. & FeliksO. (2019). Online self-assessment and peer-assessment as a tool to enhance student-teachers’ assessment skills. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(2), 169-185.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Panadero, E., & Brown, G. T. (2017). Teachers’ reasons for using peer assessment: Positive experience predicts use. European journal of psychology of education, 32, 133-156. PanaderoE. & BrownG. T. (2017). Teachers’ reasons for using peer assessment: Positive experience predicts use. European journal of psychology of education, 32, 133-156.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Yu, Y. (2022). Evaluating teaching quality in colleges and universities of public art education using the AHP fuzzy comprehensive method. Scientific Programming, 2022(1), 3529311. YuY. (2022). Evaluating teaching quality in colleges and universities of public art education using the AHP fuzzy comprehensive method. Scientific Programming, 2022(1), 3529311.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Daniawan, B. (2018). Evaluation of lecturer teaching performance using AHP and SAW methods. bit-Tech, 1(2), 74-83. DaniawanB. (2018). Evaluation of lecturer teaching performance using AHP and SAW methods. bit-Tech, 1(2), 74-83.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Lim, J. H., Lee, S. M., Kang, B. S., & Lee, B. K. (2021). A study on priority of teacher librarians’ competencies using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(2), 127-144. LimJ. H.LeeS. M.KangB. S. & LeeB. K. (2021). A study on priority of teacher librarians’ competencies using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(2), 127-144.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Owusu-Agyeman, Y., Larbi-Siaw, O., Brenya, B., & Anyidoho, A. (2017). An embedded fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for evaluating lecturers’ conceptions of teaching and learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 55, 46-57. Owusu-AgyemanY.Larbi-SiawO.BrenyaB. & AnyidohoA. (2017). An embedded fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for evaluating lecturers’ conceptions of teaching and learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 55, 46-57.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Qin, Y., Hashim, S. R. M., & Sulaiman, J. (2022). An interval AHP technique for classroom teaching quality evaluation. Education Sciences, 12(11), 736. QinY.HashimS. R. M. & SulaimanJ. (2022). An interval AHP technique for classroom teaching quality evaluation. Education Sciences, 12(11), 736.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Saaludin, N., Ismail, M. H., Mat, B. C., & Harun, S. (2019). Improving lecturers’ evaluation score by using analytic hierarchy process (AHP): A case at Universiti Kuala Lumpur. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 15(1), 391-398. SaaludinN.IsmailM. H.MatB. C. & HarunS. (2019). Improving lecturers’ evaluation score by using analytic hierarchy process (AHP): A case at Universiti Kuala Lumpur. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 15(1), 391-398.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Xu, S. L., Yeyao, T., & Shabaz, M. (2023). Multi-criteria decision making for determining best teaching method using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Soft Computing, 27(6), 2795. XuS. L.YeyaoT. & ShabazM. (2023). Multi-criteria decision making for determining best teaching method using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Soft Computing, 27(6), 2795.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Zhao, Z., Wu, T., Ding, X., & Wang, A. (2017). Teaching strategies of innovative talents training in colleges and universities based on AHP. In 8th International Computer Systems and Education Management Conference (ICSEMC 2017) (pp. 208-211). ZhaoZ.WuT.DingX. & WangA. (2017). Teaching strategies of innovative talents training in colleges and universities based on AHP. In 8th International Computer Systems and Education Management Conference (ICSEMC 2017) (pp. 208-211).Search in Google Scholar

[22] Wei, C., Zeng, X., Wang, Z., Li, S., Tong, Y., Xu, H., & Cao, L. (2022). Construction and Research on the Evaluation System of University Curriculum Teaching Quality Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology, 5(12), 10-17. WeiC.ZengX.WangZ.LiS.TongY.XuH. & CaoL. (2022). Construction and Research on the Evaluation System of University Curriculum Teaching Quality Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology, 5(12), 10-17.Search in Google Scholar