Data-driven Civic Education: Theory and Practice

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Evaluation system for effectiveness of ideological and political education

Target layer	Primary indicator	Secondary indicator	Number
Evaluation indicator system for the effectiveness of ideological and political education in agricultural and water major	Ideological and political quality (X1)	Political attitude	x1
		Values	x2
		Social responsibility	x3
	Academic performance (X2)	Normal grade	x4
		Final grade	x5
	Practice activity participation (X3)	Social practice number	x6
		Volunteer service duration	x7
	Teaching content and method (X4)	Satisfaction with course content	x8
		Satisfaction with teaching method	x9
	Teacher quality and ability (X5)	Teacher’s expertise	x10
		Teacher teaching experience	x11
	School environment (X6)	Campus culture construction	x12
		Academic atmosphere	x13
	Student feedback and satisfaction (X7)	Students’ satisfaction with teaching	x14
		Students’ satisfaction with course	x15
	Employment situation (X8)	Graduate employment	x16
		Employment quality of graduates	x17

Evaluation results of our model

Primary indicator	Scoring	Secondary indicator	Scoring
X1	78	x1	72
		x2	67
		x3	83
X2	83	x4	71
		x5	94
X3	88	x6	82
		x7	86
X4	69	x8	68
		x9	73
X5	91	x10	93
		x11	87
X6	73	x12	65
		x13	82
X7	71	x14	77
		x15	73
X8	66	x16	64
		x17	72
Total	84

Dataset description

Categories	Describe	Symbol
Basic data	Gender	y1
	Peoples	y2
	Political appearance	y3
Honor	Get school honor	y4
	Receive above provincial honors	y5
	Total amount of money awarded	y6
Grade	First semester	y7
	Second semester	y8
	Third semester	y9
	Fourth semester	y10
	Fifth semester	y11
	Sixth semester	y12
	Total score	y13

Lecture duration statistics (min)

Group	Resources	Ours	Mixed recommendation	Depth learning
G1	A1	43.48	22.37	17.26
	A2	42.76	22.05	17.58
	A8	43.03	21.36	18.31
G2	A3	42.87	22.44	15.63
	A4	42.51	21.18	16.22
	A9	43.01	21.39	16.08
G3	A5	44.56	17.65	9.84
	A6	43.98	13.56	9.17
	A7	44.21	11.34	9.26
	A10	44.35	16.49	9.08

Results od descriptive statistics and significance tests

	G1	G2	G3	Kruskal-Walls test
y1	0.53	0.47	0.22	0.009**
y2	0.27	0.38	0.31	0.083*
y3	0.58	0.22	0.33	0.103
y4	0.64	0.57	0.26	0.005**
y5	0.19	0.28	0.19	0.002**
y6	0.23	0.31	0.27	0.003**
y7	0.77	0.64	0.58	0.000***
y8	0.83	0.68	0.61	0.000***
y9	0.79	0.73	0.59	0.000***
y10	0.91	0.66	0.63	0.000***
y11	0.85	0.79	0.54	0.000***
y12	0.93	0.75	0.60	0.000***
y13	0.89	0.71	0.62	0.000***

Education resource data sample

Resources	G1	G2	G3
A1	1037	112	103
A2	1075	118	92
A3	225	1154	111
A4	210	1093	96
A5	104	83	1201
A6	100	110	1212
A7	109	103	86
A8	1100	100	119
A9	213	1211	1225
A10	212	91	95

Classification of teaching effects

Grade number	Grade name	Corresponding score
1	Excellence	90~100
2	Good	80~90
3	Medium	70~80
4	Qualify	60~70
5	Out of line	<60