A Study on the Optimal Design of Reinforced Learning-Driven Personalized Physical Training Strategies in Physical Education Instruction
e
21 mar 2025
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Pubblicato online: 21 mar 2025
Ricevuto: 30 ott 2024
Accettato: 07 feb 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0601
Parole chiave
© 2025 Yinghui Jiang et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

This algorithm and module combination Ave_RMSE enhancement
Lifting amplitude/% | KNNBasic | KNNWithMeans | KNNBaseline | SVD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
mL-1m | This algorithm | 56.40 | 56.68 | 55.18 | 54.01 |
DDPG+RLSTM | 51.63 | 51.94 | 50.28 | 49.03 | |
DDPG+LSTM | 34.60 | 35.02 | 33.11 | 31.09 | |
DDPG+T_self_attention | 37.53 | 37.93 | 35.79 | 34.17 | |
DDPG+self_attention | 35.47 | 35.88 | 33.67 | 32.00 | |
mL-100k | This algorithm | 75.08 | 74.45 | 73.67 | 74.09 |
DDPG+RLSTM | 45.95 | 44.58 | 42.90 | 43.82 | |
DDPG+LSTM | 42.15 | 40.69 | 38.89 | 39.87 | |
DDPG+T_self_attention | 53.74 | 52.58 | 51.14 | 51.92 | |
DDPG+self_attention | 45.13 | 43.74 | 42.04 | 42.96 |
Number A student and physical training strategy set
Number | Degree of recommendation | Sort |
---|---|---|
1 | 0.668 | 3 |
2 | 0.526 | 5 |
3 | 0.459 | 6 |
4 | 0.745 | 2 |
5 | 0.324 | 8 |
6 | 0.159 | 10 |
7 | 0.569 | 4 |
8 | 0.951 | 1 |
9 | 0.437 | 7 |
10 | 0.266 | 9 |
Female group k-means Cluster results
Cluster1 | Cluster2 | Cluster3 | Cluster4 | Cluster5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Case number | 650 | 710 | 4520 | 895 | 210 |
Lung capacity score | 85 | 84 | 85 | 78 | 83 |
50 meters running score | 62 | 68 | 73 | 64 | 37 |
Fixed jump | 64 | 65 | 73 | 35 | 27 |
Preflexion score | 76 | 82 | 84 | 75 | 75 |
Sit-ups scores | 65 | 18 | 71 | 68 | 28 |
1000 meters run /800 meter running score | 34 | 67 | 75 | 65 | 24 |
Health score | 65.25 | 69.26 | 79.83 | 68.56 | 52.13 |
Comparison of experimental results
Algorithm | mL-1m data set | mL-100k data set | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Ave_RMSE | Ave_MAE | Ave_RMSE | Ave_MAE | |
This algorithm | 0.402 | 0.231 | 0.243 | 0.106 |
DDPG+RLSTM | 0.446 | 0.258 | 0.527 | 0.407 |
DDPG+LSTM | 0.603 | 0.467 | 0.564 | 0.436 |
DDPG+T_self_attention | 0.576 | 0.398 | 0.451 | 0.267 |
DDPG+self_attention | 0.595 | 0.425 | 0.535 | 0.368 |
KNNBasic | 0.922 | 0.726 | 0.975 | 0.774 |
KNNWithMeans | 0.928 | 0.738 | 0.951 | 0.75 |
KNNBaseline | 0.897 | 0.703 | 0.923 | 0.727 |
SVD | 0.875 | 0.683 | 0.938 | 0.74 |
Man group k-means Cluster results
Cluster1 | Cluster2 | Cluster3 | |
---|---|---|---|
Case number | 1630 | 2468 | 1420 |
Lung capacity score | 84 | 84 | 83 |
50 meters running score | 81 | 78 | 68 |
Fixed jump | 64 | 65 | 16 |
Preflexion score | 75 | 72 | 63 |
Sit-ups scores | 72 | 7 | 5 |
1000 meters run /800 meter running score | 72 | 63 | 49 |
Health score | 78.46 | 68.21 | 57.44 |
This algorithm and module combination Ave_MAE enhancement
Lifting amplitude/% | KNNBasic | KNNWithMeans | KNNBaseline | SVD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
mL-1m | This algorithm | 68.18 | 68.70 | 67.14 | 66.19 |
DDPG+RLSTM | 64.46 | 65.04 | 63.30 | 62.24 | |
DDPG+LSTM | 35.67 | 36.72 | 33.57 | 31.63 | |
DDPG+T_self_attention | 45.18 | 46.07 | 43.39 | 41.73 | |
DDPG+self_attention | 41.46 | 42.41 | 39.54 | 37.77 | |
mL-100k | This algorithm | 86.30 | 85.90 | 85.42 | 85.68 |
DDPG+RLSTM | 47.42 | 45.73 | 44.02 | 45.00 | |
DDPG+LSTM | 43.67 | 41.87 | 40.03 | 41.08 | |
DDPG+T_self_attention | 66.50 | 64.40 | 63.27 | 63.92 | |
DDPG+self_attention | 52.45 | 50.93 | 49.38 | 50.27 |