Practice and Effectiveness Evaluation of Personalized Training Program for Physical Education Teaching Based on Intelligent Algorithm
e
19 mar 2025
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Pubblicato online: 19 mar 2025
Ricevuto: 29 ott 2024
Accettato: 19 feb 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0542
Parole chiave
© 2025 Zhijin Tong et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 8.
The experimental group was compared with the control group
| Preexperiment | After the experiment | T | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group n=30 | 3225.07±793.09 | 3353.12±806.04 | -5.136 | <0.001 |
| Control group n=30 | 3236.15±828.35 | 3305.88±811.88 | -4.648 | <0.001 |
The comparison between the experimental group and the control group was compared
| Experimental group n=30 | Control group n=30 | T | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preexperiment | 3222.2±789.62 | 3234.56±829.88 | -0.061 | 0.954 |
| After the experiment | 3353.75±802.6 | 3308.07±810.97 | 0.213 | 0.838 |
The experimental group was compared with the control group of the control group
| Preexperiment | After the experiment | T | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group n=30 | 2433.49±666.02 | 2507.11±635.38 | -6.747 | <0.001 |
| Control group n=30 | 2419.51±601.86 | 2462.82±603.48 | -2.877 | 0.017 |
The display table of partial exercise prescription
| The Core Parameters Of The Diet | Non-Core Parameters Of Weight Loss Exercise | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sports Project | Exercise Intensity (Times/Points) | Sports Time (Minute) | Motion Frequency (Secondary/Week) | Sports Method | Considerations | Taboo Disease |
| Walk Away | 117~164 | 30~60 | 5~7 | The Upper Body Is Upright In The Top 35 Degrees, And Head Up And Chest. The Two Arms Naturally Oscillate. | Choose The Appropriate Sports Environment And Relax. | Nothing |
| Stair | 110~170 | 20~40 | 3~5 | The Body Must Be Slightly Slightly Smaller Than The Stairs, And Keep The Flexibility Of The Lower Joints | Don’t Exercise This Exercise With The Ankle Joint. | Knee Joint, Ankle Disease, Asthma. |
| Cross Race | 120~175 | 30~60 | 3~5 | The Speed Of The Running Is Appropriate, And The Two Methods Are Practiced By Timing. | Choose The Appropriate Equipment And Relax After Exercise. | Heart Disease, Asthma, And Cardiopulmonary Dysfunction. |
| … | … | … | … | … | … | … |
| Aerobics | 105~168 | 20~50 | 5~7 | Choose The Appropriate Aerobic Rhythm Exercise. | Warm Up And Choose The Appropriate Environment. | Heart Disease, Asthma, And Cardiopulmonary Dysfunction. |
The distribution scheme of the exercise process
| Motor Process | Motor Intensity | Motion Time |
|---|---|---|
| Presports | Lesser | Shorter (About 20%) |
| Medium Motion | Larger | Longer (About 60%) |
| Postmotion | Lesser | Shorter (About 20%) |
The algorithm improves the calculation results of different values
| Case | Different value | ARA | Ours |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 | Single average | 1.49E+00 | 9.87E-01 |
| Ten mean | 1.78E+00 | 1.07E+00 | |
| The 10 optimal average | 1.41E+00 | 6.83E-01 | |
| Case 2 | Single average | 2.27E+00 | 1.16E+00 |
| Ten mean | 1.35E+00 | 0.74E+00 | |
| The 10 optimal average | 1.76E+00 | 6.67EE-01 | |
| Case 3 | Single average | 1.81E+00 | 1.5E+00 |
| Ten mean | 2.15E+00 | 1.19E+00 | |
| The 10 optimal average | 1.23E+00 | 8.85E-01 | |
| Case 4 | Single average | 1.98E+00 | 10.23E+00 |
| Ten mean | 2.05E+00 | 1.32E+00 | |
| The 10 optimal average | 1.52E+00 | 8.35E-01 | |
| Case 5 | Single average | 1.14E+00 | 8.67E-01 |
| Ten mean | 0.88E+00 | 9.81E-01 | |
| The 10 optimal average | 7.74E-01 | 4.25E-01 | |
| Case 6 | Single average | 1.41E+00 | 8.93E-01 |
| Ten mean | 1.18E+00 | 1.56E+00 | |
| The 10 optimal average | 7.67E-01 | 5.52E-01 | |
| Case 7 | Single average | 1.8E+00 | 1.89E+00 |
| Ten mean | 1.92E+00 | 1.38E+00 | |
| The 10 optimal average | 1.26E+00 | 0.91E+00 | |
| Case 8 | Single average | 1.98E+00 | 1.86E+00 |
| Ten mean | 1.65E+00 | 1.44E+00 | |
| The 10 optimal average | 1.25E+00 | 1.36E+00 | |
| Case 9 | Single average | 1.38E+00 | 0.83E+00 |
| Ten mean | 1.84E+00 | 1.71E+00 | |
| The 10 optimal average | 1.23E+00 | 1.4E+00 | |
| Case 10 | Single average | 1.91E+00 | 2.08E+00 |
| Ten mean | 2.14E+00 | 1.55E+00 | |
| The 10 optimal average | 1.25E+00 | 1.22E+00 |
The comparison was compared with the control group
| Experimental group n=30 | Control group n=30 | T | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preexperiment | 2431.13±665.33 | 2418.5±603.28 | 0.102 | 0.91 |
| After the experiment | 2509.88±634.7 | 2465.18±603.48 | 0.272 | 0.793 |
The experimental group was compared with the group of the control group
| Preexperiment | After the experiment | T | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group n=30 | 18.47±2.49 | 18.21±2.34 | 2.721 | 0.017 |
| Control group n=30 | 18.44±2.33 | 18.09±2.45 | 1.346 | 0.145 |